nemo

nemo — CS2 Stats

US76561198286605220[U:1:326339492]Steam profile ↗

1,711Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,099Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,915 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate38.2%49.0%52.0%13.9% short
Shot accuracy15.7%13.1%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.101.081.08meets
Match win rate52.7%46.9%48.8%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnemoFACEITLevel 9 · 1,915 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning61
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT61345Last 10061%Win rateWWWWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.4
Aggression8.3
Utility4.5
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.1
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time610ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.32Best rating — inferno 9–1
130Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
W5Current streak
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 59% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2213959%0.03
infernoA1912763%0.09
dust2S1510567%0.06
anubisS118373%0.04
nukeS65183%0.10
officeA53260%0.06
overpass42250%0.04
ancient41325%0.06
vertigo31233%-0.04
stronghold32167%0.11
cache220100%0.03
train21150%0.09
warden2020%0.04
alpine1010%0.00
poseidon110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (59% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,182Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
3,086Matches
52.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
38.2%Headshot %
15.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
9,728MVPs
1,110Hours (in match)
1,698Bombs planted
651Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,703dust2
4,902inferno
1,995nuke
670vertigo
614train
227office
80cbble
41lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

111Matches
60%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
82.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3962%1.4017.9
Inferno1953%1.1616.3
Dust21540%1.0717.6
Anubis1486%1.1518.8
Ancient580%1.0417.4
Nuke333%0.9320.3
Train20%0.9415.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.6%Spray accuracy
85.5%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
609msReaction time
35.4%T opening success
55.2%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
7.32HE damage / grenade
11.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4599 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.4012% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–50.0619%24 May
dust213–20.1624%16 May
dust213–100.0521%16 May
mirage13–5-0.0121%16 May
cache13–20.0716%16 May
dust23–13-0.0528%16 May
cache13–7-0.0220%10 May
dust213–90.0218%10 May
vertigo1–9-0.0013%9 Apr
inferno3–9-0.0729%28 Mar
inferno9–50.0529%28 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0318%15 Mar
mirage13–20.0818%15 Mar
mirage13–1-0.0315%8 Mar
inferno12–120.1123%8 Mar
overpass13–60.1530%6 Mar
anubis9–130.0216%23 Feb
dust213–20.0711%23 Feb
dust24–130.0311%23 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0013%19 Feb
inferno13–50.0221%19 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0623%17 Feb
mirage10–130.0123%17 Feb
vertigo13–60.0724%17 Feb
mirage1–13-0.0625%17 Feb
office13–40.0720%10 Feb
inferno13–30.1318%10 Feb
overpass8–130.0617%10 Feb
stronghold13–80.2323%9 Feb
overpass13–9-0.0118%9 Feb
inferno13–40.0213%9 Feb
dust213–70.0332%9 Feb
dust212–120.1417%9 Feb
anubis13–70.1017%9 Feb
mirage13–70.1021%9 Feb
anubis13–80.0822%8 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0120%8 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0126%8 Feb
dust213–100.1129%7 Feb
nuke9–60.1222%7 Feb
anubis13–40.0517%7 Feb
ancient12–120.1019%6 Feb
anubis2–13-0.0221%6 Feb
mirage13–60.1324%6 Feb
mirage13–30.1328%6 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0114%6 Feb
dust212–120.1621%5 Feb
train7–130.0536%5 Feb
ancient13–100.1222%5 Feb
dust213–00.0814%5 Feb
dust213–40.1319%5 Feb
nuke13–110.0820%5 Feb
anubis13–100.0523%5 Feb
anubis13–10.1817%4 Feb
inferno7–130.0317%3 Feb
nuke13–30.1022%3 Feb
inferno13–40.1730%3 Feb
nuke6–9-0.0719%2 Feb
inferno9–50.1821%2 Feb
inferno9–10.3220%2 Feb
anubis13–70.0419%2 Feb
inferno13–30.0916%1 Feb
warden4–50.0815%1 Feb
train13–60.1421%1 Feb
mirage4–110.1221%1 Feb
mirage8–130.0711%1 Feb
stronghold13–20.1420%1 Feb
mirage13–40.0212%1 Feb
dust213–90.0528%31 Jan
mirage13–50.0414%31 Jan
mirage13–70.0316%29 Jan
ancient4–130.0312%28 Jan
dust212–16-0.0031%28 Jan
inferno9–10.1213%28 Jan
vertigo6–9-0.1918%28 Jan
mirage13–50.0426%26 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0124%26 Jan
inferno6–9-0.0733%26 Jan
inferno9–10.2824%26 Jan
nuke9–00.2538%26 Jan
inferno9–10.2035%26 Jan
nuke9–50.0929%26 Jan
inferno8–80.0440%26 Jan
office13–10.0728%25 Jan
alpine8–130.0019%23 Jan
office6–130.0614%23 Jan
inferno9–30.0418%23 Jan
warden3–13-0.0020%23 Jan
stronghold1–13-0.0416%22 Jan
anubis2–13-0.0823%22 Jan
office6–130.039%22 Jan
poseidon9–7-0.0413%22 Jan
anubis13–40.0626%21 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0120%21 Jan
anubis13–10-0.0016%21 Jan
mirage16–130.0016%20 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0221%20 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0023%20 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0025%20 Jan
dust213–9-0.0429%20 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →