najemnik z charkowa

najemnik z charkowa — CS2 Stats

76561198285425665[U:1:325159937]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

365Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,637Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning44
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT41518Last 10041%Win rateWWWWLTWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression6.1
Utility3.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch4.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 645ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.4
Utility3.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact8.6

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time684ms+52ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 684ms
Headshot accuracy23.5%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — inferno 9–3
130Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
713In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 16nukeWeakest map · 13% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2091145%0.00
infernoC1981142%-0.00
dust2A1610663%-0.00
nukeD1621413%-0.01
poseidonB84450%-0.02
overpassD61517%-0.08
ancientD62433%0.00
vertigoA53260%-0.06
train21150%-0.01
cache110100%0.04
sanctum1010%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,077Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
2,047Matches
42.3%Match win rate
44.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
11.2%Shot accuracy
4,277MVPs
928Hours (in match)
1,014Bombs planted
312Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,428dust2
1,437nuke
1,332inferno
993vertigo
420cbble
291train
43office
37italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

65Matches
63%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
82.8ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2471%1.1616.5
Ancient1479%1.2117.6
Dust21250%1.2017.8
Inferno450%0.8513.8
Nuke333%0.7912.0
Anubis2100%1.3120.0
Cache1100%1.2922.0
Vertigo1100%1.0814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
645msReaction time
34.7%T opening success
34.8%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
9.10HE damage / grenade
3.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3851 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.7404% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–90.0315%13 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0322%13 Jun
cache13–90.0424%13 Jun
mirage13–40.0242%1 May
poseidon1–9-0.2117%22 Mar
poseidon8–8-0.1511%22 Mar
poseidon9–70.0919%22 Mar
nuke5–9-0.1325%22 Mar
dust213–70.1323%22 Mar
mirage13–80.0835%22 Mar
vertigo9–7-0.0715%22 Mar
poseidon5–9-0.0540%22 Mar
poseidon9–50.0826%22 Mar
inferno9–30.2246%22 Mar
overpass7–9-0.0116%21 Mar
nuke9–60.0222%21 Mar
poseidon8–8-0.0633%21 Mar
sanctum8–80.0924%21 Mar
poseidon9–50.1019%21 Mar
poseidon9–70.0353%21 Mar
dust28–13-0.0719%21 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0316%21 Mar
mirage11–130.0227%20 Mar
mirage12–120.0621%20 Mar
mirage12–120.0928%17 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0823%17 Mar
dust213–11-0.0424%16 Mar
dust213–00.000%16 Mar
dust213–70.1020%15 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0617%15 Mar
mirage13–4-0.039%15 Mar
overpass4–9-0.1320%15 Mar
nuke3–9-0.1326%15 Mar
nuke7–90.0218%15 Mar
dust213–9-0.0326%12 Mar
mirage9–00.0014%12 Mar
dust27–13-0.0832%12 Mar
nuke8–80.0530%12 Mar
inferno2–9-0.0115%12 Mar
dust211–13-0.0714%10 Mar
ancient14–160.0232%9 Feb
dust213–9-0.0311%9 Feb
mirage13–110.1025%9 Feb
overpass0–11-0.0110%9 Feb
dust213–80.0136%8 Feb
dust213–40.0514%8 Feb
vertigo9–7-0.0220%14 Jan
inferno8–80.016%14 Jan
inferno8–8-0.058%5 Jan
nuke9–30.1726%5 Jan
inferno9–50.0029%5 Jan
nuke6–9-0.0830%5 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0621%4 Jan
ancient5–13-0.0521%4 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0320%4 Jan
train13–80.0120%4 Jan
mirage13–40.0423%4 Jan
inferno6–90.0415%31 Dec
inferno7–9-0.0223%31 Dec
dust26–13-0.0120%30 Dec
train1–8-0.0325%25 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0322%25 Dec
nuke9–130.0224%24 Dec
dust213–60.0633%24 Dec
mirage5–130.0519%17 Dec
dust26–13-0.0429%13 Dec
nuke9–130.0421%13 Dec
mirage16–130.0614%13 Dec
nuke3–9-0.1210%19 Nov
nuke7–9-0.0232%19 Nov
nuke4–9-0.0524%18 Nov
ancient11–13-0.0413%18 Nov
ancient1–90.0113%17 Nov
inferno2–9-0.2042%17 Nov
inferno9–60.0829%17 Nov
inferno9–13-0.0612%3 Nov
nuke10–13-0.0814%3 Nov
vertigo1–9-0.1317%27 Oct
inferno3–9-0.1515%27 Oct
overpass5–9-0.1825%23 Oct
overpass9–6-0.0320%23 Oct
overpass7–9-0.1228%22 Oct
vertigo7–9-0.1712%21 Oct
vertigo9–40.0943%21 Oct
inferno2–9-0.2133%21 Oct
nuke9–13-0.0222%21 Oct
inferno13–10.1317%21 Oct
nuke9–130.0419%16 Oct
mirage6–13-0.0515%16 Oct
nuke6–90.0621%11 Oct
inferno9–70.0118%11 Oct
inferno7–9-0.0524%11 Oct
inferno9–60.1523%11 Oct
inferno2–9-0.1212%10 Oct
dust214–16-0.0230%10 Oct
inferno9–60.1026%9 Oct
inferno9–30.0828%9 Oct
ancient13–60.0825%9 Oct
ancient13–90.0020%9 Oct
mirage8–13-0.0510%9 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →