DoorMatt

DoorMatt — CS2 Stats

GB76561198275913174[U:1:315647446]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

208Tracked matches34%Win rate2023Tracked since
686Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.8 Learning
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14144 of 22247 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,789), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate40.2%44.1%47.2%7.0% short
Shot accuracy9.0%11.4%12.7%3.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.031.090.18 short
Match win rate43.3%45.2%46.6%3.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDoorMattPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim31
Positioning26
Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41545Last 10041%Win rateLLLLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.1
Aggression2.4
Utility2.1
Positioning2.6
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 63% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.1
Positioning2.6
Utility2.1
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 2.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time654ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — nuke 13–7
130Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
L5Current streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD1751229%-0.05
cacheA1710759%-0.03
ancientC135838%-0.02
mirageA138562%0.00
nukeD113827%-0.01
anubisD112918%-0.05
dust2A85363%-0.03
overpass3030%-0.04
train31233%0.02
boulder21150%-0.04
fachwerk1010%-0.06
vertigo110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

15,098Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
913Matches
43.3%Match win rate
40.2%Headshot %
9.0%Shot accuracy
1,567MVPs
335Hours (in match)
596Bombs planted
141Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,496nuke
960inferno
692dust2
375train
149vertigo
134office
85lake
63militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
26.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.8%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
12.4°Preaim
653msReaction time
20.1%T opening success
33.9%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
1.9%Flash assists
6.47HE damage / grenade
1.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.3705° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.323 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–13-0.0329%21 Aug
dust25–13-0.0512%21 Aug
inferno1–13-0.1022%21 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0621%21 Aug
cache6–13-0.0120%21 Aug
ancient13–11-0.078%21 Aug
mirage8–130.0210%18 Aug
ancient13–90.0010%18 Aug
mirage8–13-0.044%15 Aug
nuke10–130.0211%15 Aug
ancient3–13-0.1027%15 Aug
anubis6–13-0.014%15 Aug
inferno2–13-0.1021%14 Aug
cache4–13-0.126%14 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0622%14 Aug
cache13–11-0.048%14 Aug
cache13–10-0.0218%14 Aug
anubis5–13-0.106%14 Aug
cache3–13-0.0925%13 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0422%13 Aug
cache8–13-0.0416%8 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0811%8 Aug
nuke13–70.1026%8 Aug
cache9–130.0116%7 Aug
cache13–7-0.0214%7 Aug
ancient13–0-0.0527%7 Aug
nuke13–40.048%7 Aug
mirage13–80.0218%7 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0818%7 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0414%7 Aug
cache13–20.0116%7 Aug
dust213–110.0412%6 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0217%6 Aug
anubis3–13-0.065%6 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0112%6 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0520%6 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0112%6 Aug
cache13–10-0.0715%6 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0329%6 Aug
cache8–130.0319%5 Aug
inferno13–60.029%5 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0723%5 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0517%5 Aug
ancient16–120.0431%5 Aug
cache9–13-0.0118%4 Aug
cache13–110.0221%4 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0415%4 Aug
dust26–13-0.0911%4 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0420%3 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0827%3 Aug
cache13–9-0.0619%3 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0519%3 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0814%3 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0721%3 Aug
ancient11–130.0012%3 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0514%1 Aug
nuke10–13-0.008%1 Aug
cache13–5-0.0013%1 Aug
mirage5–130.1020%31 Jul
cache13–10.0126%31 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0725%31 Jul
ancient13–60.0121%30 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0115%30 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0617%30 Jul
cache13–11-0.0122%30 Jul
mirage13–60.0510%30 Jul
boulder12–12-0.0317%24 Jul
fachwerk8–13-0.0626%17 Jul
overpass7–13-0.0816%17 Jul
boulder13–6-0.0538%17 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0913%17 Jul
inferno7–13-0.119%17 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0217%4 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0517%4 Jul
overpass7–13-0.0825%1 Mar
vertigo13–7-0.0610%1 Mar
mirage16–140.0312%20 Feb
inferno2–13-0.0916%20 Feb
overpass10–130.0418%1 Jan
ancient3–130.0415%1 Jan
nuke14–16-0.0217%30 Dec
inferno5–13-0.0313%27 Dec
mirage13–6-0.018%27 Dec
train10–130.0314%27 Dec
anubis7–130.0517%27 Dec
inferno13–90.0722%27 Dec
mirage13–7-0.0021%27 Dec
ancient9–130.033%27 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0315%22 Dec
dust213–11-0.049%22 Dec
dust213–5-0.0813%17 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0328%17 Dec
train9–130.0221%13 Dec
mirage13–70.0623%13 Dec
inferno15–15-0.0118%13 Dec
train13–80.0021%13 Dec
dust25–130.0419%12 Dec
nuke3–13-0.0217%12 Dec
dust213–11-0.0526%29 Nov
dust213–40.0213%23 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →