DanXO

DanXO — CS2 Stats

PL76561198274983593[U:1:314717865]Steam profile ↗

941Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,386Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10088 of 15533 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDanXOFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER14,999 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning46
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53434Last 10053%Win rateWWLWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim5.9
Aggression4.2
Utility7.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch2.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.6
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time593ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy12.3%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 12.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — nuke 13–7
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 24infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2415963%-0.00
ancientB1991047%0.01
mirageA1811761%0.00
dust2A138562%-0.01
infernoD124833%-0.02
cacheA106460%-0.01
anubis2020%-0.04
overpass1010%-0.03
vertigo1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

30,581Lifetime kills
0.72K/D
2,162Matches
36.2%Match win rate
34.3%Headshot %
8.3%Shot accuracy
3,063MVPs
754Hours (in match)
1,726Bombs planted
478Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,746dust2
1,827inferno
1,337nuke
506train
404cbble
296vertigo
44lake
2ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

39Matches
54%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
89.1ADR
30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
7%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient450%1.4217.8
Dust2367%1.0117.7
Mirage367%1.1819.3
Inferno20%0.9219.0
Anubis250%1.0414.0
Overpass2100%1.2413.5
Vertigo10%0.8016.0
Nuke1100%1.7514.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.8%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
596msReaction time
28.0%T opening success
40.4%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
1.4%Flash assists
12.30HE damage / grenade
9.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.7988% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.9909% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–70.027%24 Aug
nuke13–40.1216%18 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0123%18 Aug
cache13–110.0312%17 Aug
inferno13–100.0210%17 Aug
dust213–20.0410%11 Aug
ancient10–130.0110%4 Aug
mirage13–30.0411%3 Aug
ancient5–130.0113%3 Aug
dust28–130.0511%2 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0011%2 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0513%2 Aug
cache13–50.0313%2 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0010%1 Aug
nuke12–16-0.033%31 Jul
mirage13–20.087%25 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0216%24 Jul
anubis6–13-0.055%24 Jul
ancient13–60.066%23 Jul
dust213–40.068%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0815%22 Jul
inferno13–20.059%21 Jul
nuke6–130.0213%21 Jul
inferno11–13-0.059%20 Jul
ancient13–70.0912%20 Jul
mirage13–10.0415%19 Jul
nuke10–130.0214%18 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0312%17 Jul
ancient13–30.0928%17 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0316%17 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0020%15 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0412%15 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0217%14 Jul
nuke13–100.0213%13 Jul
inferno13–100.0215%10 Jul
cache10–130.0514%9 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0210%9 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0616%8 Jul
nuke9–60.017%8 Jul
dust28–10.0714%2 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0215%6 Jun
mirage13–70.069%5 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0111%3 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0214%20 May
nuke5–13-0.0620%20 May
dust26–13-0.049%19 May
ancient8–13-0.0116%18 May
mirage13–30.0211%18 May
inferno5–130.0110%18 May
cache6–13-0.056%17 May
nuke13–30.0110%17 May
mirage6–13-0.0717%17 May
cache13–7-0.067%17 May
mirage1–13-0.0613%17 May
dust213–8-0.0214%16 May
ancient11–13-0.0212%15 May
ancient13–80.0318%15 May
nuke13–5-0.0015%15 May
ancient13–40.0624%14 May
ancient6–00.0642%14 May
dust213–8-0.0317%14 May
mirage7–13-0.0422%14 May
nuke13–90.0113%14 May
overpass4–13-0.0320%9 May
nuke13–7-0.0419%9 May
cache13–4-0.0418%9 May
mirage5–13-0.083%6 May
inferno11–13-0.0612%6 May
dust213–8-0.0111%5 May
ancient12–12-0.039%5 May
ancient13–7-0.0413%4 May
cache13–90.0119%4 May
nuke5–13-0.0312%3 May
dust26–13-0.0310%3 May
mirage12–12-0.016%2 May
cache12–120.0215%2 May
nuke4–13-0.066%29 Apr
cache7–13-0.0322%29 Apr
cache13–8-0.047%29 Apr
mirage13–11-0.008%25 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0619%25 Apr
mirage13–00.0514%24 Apr
ancient10–13-0.048%24 Apr
mirage16–14-0.0513%21 Apr
dust213–10-0.0018%21 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0512%19 Apr
nuke13–90.0216%19 Apr
mirage13–70.0914%19 Apr
nuke13–70.1214%18 Apr
dust26–13-0.0411%18 Apr
nuke9–130.0113%18 Apr
dust213–8-0.0815%18 Apr
nuke12–12-0.026%15 Apr
ancient13–90.0513%15 Apr
inferno11–13-0.028%15 Apr
inferno13–3-0.074%14 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0221%14 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0313%14 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0313%14 Apr
vertigo11–13-0.050%13 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →