✪ bOchaN_

✪ bOchaN_ — CS2 Stats

ES76561198267906176[U:1:307640448]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

924Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,945Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,140 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ bOchaN_FACEITLevel 5 · 1,140 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning51
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50491Last 10050%Win rateLWLWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression6.4
Utility3.9
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch0.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.1
Utility3.9
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time594ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — anubis 13–10
132Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 20% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA30181260%-0.00
ancientD1651131%-0.01
mirageD1531220%-0.00
anubisA127558%0.00
dust2A116555%0.00
overpassA74357%0.00
nukeS65183%0.03
cache21150%-0.01
poseidon110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

55,180Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
3,416Matches
41.4%Match win rate
45.7%Headshot %
15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
7,674MVPs
1,135Hours (in match)
2,539Bombs planted
650Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

9,588inferno
2,630dust2
1,896train
1,495nuke
1,446vertigo
734cbble
40lake
29safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

441Matches
52%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
83.1ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

23%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1362%1.0016.3
Mirage838%0.8414.4
Dust2875%1.0816.1
Ancient650%0.9915.0
Nuke540%0.8413.4
Overpass475%1.3221.0
Vertigo333%0.8112.7
Train3100%1.8322.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.9%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
582msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
42.5%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
12.3%Flash assists
8.04HE damage / grenade
2.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4883 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.6034% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–130.0124%28 Aug
anubis13–90.0012%28 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0133%28 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0016%18 Aug
ancient11–130.0230%18 Aug
inferno13–20.0327%18 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0214%18 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0422%12 Aug
mirage8–130.0030%6 Aug
inferno13–80.0418%6 Aug
cache1–13-0.070%6 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0415%31 Jul
nuke13–40.0929%31 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0517%27 Jul
dust26–13-0.0129%17 Jul
poseidon9–7-0.0041%8 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0219%27 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0220%27 Jun
mirage13–30.0211%25 Jun
inferno2–9-0.1426%25 Jun
inferno5–130.0024%20 Jun
anubis13–80.0218%19 Jun
ancient9–130.0119%19 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0513%8 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0321%6 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0119%6 Jun
inferno13–110.0334%5 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0331%5 Jun
inferno8–13-0.048%5 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0211%5 Jun
ancient11–130.0119%1 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0420%30 May
nuke13–80.0313%30 May
inferno15–150.0128%30 May
nuke13–60.0516%30 May
inferno13–100.0218%30 May
overpass13–10-0.0017%29 May
anubis13–90.0117%29 May
cache13–80.0618%29 May
ancient10–130.0122%29 May
dust23–13-0.0412%29 May
inferno10–13-0.0238%28 May
overpass13–110.0127%24 May
anubis13–110.0514%24 May
dust213–11-0.0313%24 May
mirage8–13-0.0212%24 May
dust28–13-0.0414%22 May
inferno13–10-0.0515%21 May
dust216–14-0.0610%20 May
inferno14–16-0.0425%16 May
mirage10–13-0.0217%16 May
inferno11–13-0.0313%15 May
overpass13–40.0825%15 May
inferno5–13-0.0525%14 May
inferno7–13-0.0624%13 May
mirage11–130.0129%11 May
inferno13–8-0.036%11 May
overpass7–130.0213%9 May
inferno13–80.079%8 May
anubis8–13-0.0613%8 May
mirage6–13-0.0121%8 May
dust213–80.0721%8 May
dust213–80.0020%8 May
anubis13–10-0.0018%7 May
mirage9–130.0120%7 May
mirage9–13-0.0121%6 May
mirage13–100.0511%1 May
inferno16–130.0112%1 May
inferno13–60.0725%27 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0029%26 Apr
inferno13–30.0923%25 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0129%25 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0527%24 Apr
inferno13–80.0320%24 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0319%24 Apr
inferno14–160.0119%18 Apr
overpass2–13-0.0125%17 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0120%17 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0118%17 Apr
nuke13–50.0420%17 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0112%17 Apr
inferno13–50.0538%17 Apr
ancient13–110.0120%15 Apr
inferno13–110.0230%15 Apr
dust213–50.049%15 Apr
mirage11–130.0433%15 Apr
overpass13–6-0.0213%15 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0316%15 Apr
dust212–16-0.0322%14 Apr
ancient13–90.0627%14 Apr
mirage5–130.0018%10 Apr
ancient0–13-0.1011%10 Apr
dust213–60.0328%8 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0015%7 Apr
inferno3–9-0.0919%7 Apr
inferno13–90.0015%6 Apr
overpass14–16-0.0414%6 Apr
inferno13–80.0534%3 Apr
anubis13–100.1425%3 Apr
dust25–130.0714%3 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →