KAKAPOOPOOPPSHIRE — CS2 Stats
76561198265018621[U:1:304752893]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
Rating over time
Faceit ELO
- At peak — 1,409
- Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 122 to go
- Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
- Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29
- Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29
CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.
Sharp aimer
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 92% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 28 | 13–15 | 46% | 0.06 | |
| A | 28 | 16–12 | 57% | 0.05 | |
| A | 20 | 11–9 | 55% | 0.05 | |
| A | 11 | 6–5 | 55% | 0.07 | |
| office | S | 7 | 6–1 | 86% | 0.10 |
| — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | 0.02 | |
| — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | -0.04 | |
| shelter | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.02 |
| — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.12 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 22 | 55% | 1.40 | 18.3 |
| Ancient | 14 | 64% | 1.60 | 20.9 |
| Dust2 | 13 | 69% | 1.49 | 22.1 |
| Inferno | 9 | 89% | 1.34 | 18.9 |
| Nuke | 7 | 71% | 1.54 | 20.3 |
| Anubis | 4 | 50% | 1.87 | 24.3 |
| Overpass | 2 | 50% | 1.68 | 22.0 |
| Cache | 1 | 100% | 1.50 | 21.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4947 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
46% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10–13 | 0.10 | 7% | 29 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.08 | 12% | 29 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.10 | 5% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.13 | 16% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.06 | 12% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.09 | 24% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.10 | 16% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.11 | 31% | 26 Aug → | ||
| office | 13–9 | 0.10 | 19% | 24 Aug → | |
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 24% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.00 | 9% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.08 | 17% | 23 Aug → | ||
| office | 8–13 | 0.06 | 31% | 23 Aug → | |
| 13–3 | 0.12 | 22% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.04 | 19% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 25% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.05 | 16% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.08 | 17% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 19% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.07 | 13% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.07 | 37% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.02 | 20% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | 0.08 | 30% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.04 | 32% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.00 | 22% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.09 | 21% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 36% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 6–7 | 0.00 | 37% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.06 | 29% | 14 Aug → | ||
| office | 13–5 | 0.05 | 35% | 14 Aug → | |
| 13–8 | 0.09 | 16% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.09 | 26% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.11 | 16% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.04 | 31% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.09 | 17% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.07 | 30% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.04 | 29% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 21% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.00 | 19% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.07 | 11% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.06 | 21% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.09 | 17% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 12% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 27% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 11–4 | 0.10 | 21% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.05 | 26% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.11 | 26% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.07 | 40% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.03 | 18% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 14% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.10 | 23% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 32% | 16 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.05 | 17% | 16 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.08 | 17% | 15 Jul → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.07 | 13% | 15 Jul → | ||
| office | 13–11 | 0.01 | 16% | 14 Jul → | |
| 2–3 | 0.26 | 44% | 14 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.03 | 30% | 13 Jul → | ||
| office | 13–3 | 0.24 | 25% | 12 Jul → | |
| 13–5 | 0.02 | 12% | 12 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 29% | 11 Jul → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.26 | 28% | 11 Jul → | ||
| office | 13–5 | 0.13 | 28% | 11 Jul → | |
| 11–13 | 0.13 | 26% | 11 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.07 | 20% | 9 Jul → | ||
| shelter | 5–13 | 0.02 | 11% | 9 Jul → | |
| 13–16 | 0.02 | 18% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.07 | 39% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.03 | 23% | 7 Jul → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.01 | 20% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.03 | 24% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.05 | 25% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 13% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.06 | 19% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.03 | 14% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 2–9 | -0.02 | 17% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.12 | 37% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 7–1 | 0.02 | 50% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.07 | 20% | 27 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.02 | 19% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.14 | 30% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.01 | 32% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.07 | 47% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.06 | 29% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.01 | 38% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.03 | 28% | 19 Jun → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.15 | 26% | 17 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.10 | 21% | 16 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.08 | 27% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.09 | 25% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.11 | 19% | 13 Jun → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.10 | 25% | 13 Jun → | ||
| 5–7 | 0.05 | 44% | 13 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 29% | 13 Jun → | ||
| office | 13–6 | 0.08 | 56% | 12 Jun → | |
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 20% | 12 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.10 | 28% | 12 Jun → | ||
| 3–2 | 0.11 | 17% | 12 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.05 | 34% | 11 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.06 | 52% | 11 Jun → |
Match data via Leetify.