Tabsterz — CS2 Stats

76561198252681838[U:1:292416110]

1,914Tracked matches43%Win rate2024Tracked since
2,553Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,289 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTabsterzFACEITLevel 5 · 1,289 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning52
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY3862Last 10038%Win rateLWWWWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.7
Aggression5.9
Utility5.1
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 656ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.2
Utility5.1
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time662ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms
Headshot accuracy24.4%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — anubis 13–5
133Biggest win — anubis
4Longest win streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 10anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27121544%0.01
dust2D2161529%-0.02
nukeB136746%0.01
infernoD134931%-0.00
anubisD113827%0.05
ancientA106460%0.02
overpass31233%-0.01
cache2020%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

27,014Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
1,613Matches
44.6%Match win rate
43.9%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,423MVPs
692Hours (in match)
2,270Bombs planted
479Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,411dust2
2,815inferno
1,246nuke
671vertigo
613train
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,915Matches
48%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
74.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage50550%1.1015.2
Dust239447%1.1115.3
Inferno32450%1.0615.3
Anubis22849%1.1416.4
Nuke15541%1.0715.3
Ancient13747%1.0815.5
Train6149%1.1516.5
Overpass5040%1.0514.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
88.0%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
656msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
54.0%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
10.08HE damage / grenade
11.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4646 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.9461% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0335%28 Aug
dust213–11-0.0124%27 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0210%26 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0228%25 Aug
dust213–60.0642%25 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0740%20 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0114%18 Aug
anubis12–160.0236%16 Aug
dust29–13-0.0121%15 Aug
inferno13–40.1631%7 Aug
anubis6–130.0423%5 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0529%4 Aug
inferno13–100.0929%30 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0018%28 Jul
mirage13–90.0821%26 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0324%24 Jul
inferno14–160.0132%20 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0319%14 Jul
inferno23–25-0.0318%13 Jul
anubis8–130.0429%8 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0323%5 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0031%1 Jul
inferno13–80.0520%1 Jul
mirage7–130.0325%28 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0813%27 Jun
nuke13–50.1019%26 Jun
mirage9–130.0117%25 Jun
cache10–13-0.0031%24 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0318%24 Jun
dust210–130.0033%23 Jun
nuke13–80.0625%22 Jun
dust23–13-0.0314%21 Jun
nuke5–130.0213%20 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0316%20 Jun
nuke13–30.0319%20 Jun
dust26–130.0237%20 Jun
mirage13–40.0427%18 Jun
dust22–13-0.0526%18 Jun
ancient13–160.1318%16 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0519%15 Jun
dust216–14-0.0328%14 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0433%14 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0030%12 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0225%10 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0211%10 Jun
ancient13–80.0239%10 Jun
mirage10–130.1131%4 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0412%29 May
dust25–13-0.0731%29 May
nuke13–8-0.039%25 May
dust211–13-0.0620%25 May
nuke8–130.0113%22 May
mirage13–160.0840%21 May
nuke0–13-0.0367%20 May
anubis10–130.0425%20 May
mirage13–10-0.0613%18 May
inferno7–13-0.0233%17 May
mirage9–13-0.0731%16 May
mirage13–10-0.0328%15 May
mirage9–130.0918%14 May
dust213–30.0418%14 May
mirage13–6-0.0321%12 May
mirage13–30.2220%11 May
anubis10–13-0.0126%8 May
anubis13–80.0519%8 May
mirage12–16-0.0118%7 May
dust26–13-0.0426%7 May
dust28–13-0.0815%7 May
inferno5–13-0.0620%7 May
dust22–13-0.0532%6 May
ancient9–13-0.0121%6 May
cache4–13-0.1119%5 May
anubis5–130.0517%3 May
inferno11–13-0.0316%1 May
ancient13–9-0.0334%30 Apr
nuke11–130.0110%28 Apr
overpass12–16-0.0235%28 Apr
nuke13–80.0715%27 Apr
ancient13–50.1031%27 Apr
dust213–11-0.0131%26 Apr
anubis11–130.1426%25 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0522%25 Apr
anubis13–50.2432%25 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0521%24 Apr
overpass6–130.0223%21 Apr
mirage13–110.0632%20 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0021%20 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0529%16 Apr
mirage13–80.0133%14 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0211%14 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0019%7 Apr
dust25–13-0.0715%7 Apr
inferno10–13-0.089%5 Apr
ancient16–140.0518%5 Apr
dust213–160.0421%3 Apr
dust25–130.0818%3 Apr
dust213–50.0320%24 Mar
dust27–13-0.0617%23 Mar
nuke2–13-0.0533%23 Mar
mirage16–130.0827%19 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →