YungChiquita — CS2 Stats
76561198209203935[U:1:248938207]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 8 median | Level 9 median | vs Level 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 20.8% | 47.2% | 49.0% | 28.2% short |
| Shot accuracy | 14.3% | 12.3% | 13.1% | above |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 1.08 | 0.05 short |
| Match win rate | 43.4% | 46.3% | 46.9% | 3.5% short |
This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Limited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 cache | C | 30 | 13–17 | 43% | 0.02 |
 mirage | A | 23 | 13–10 | 57% | 0.01 |
 dust2 | A | 14 | 9–5 | 64% | -0.03 |
 anubis | C | 11 | 4–7 | 36% | 0.00 |
 nuke | B | 10 | 5–5 | 50% | -0.00 |
 ancient | S | 7 | 5–2 | 71% | 0.01 |
 overpass | — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | -0.01 |
 inferno | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.02 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 56 | 48% | 1.12 | 16.5 |
| Ancient | 49 | 55% | 1.06 | 14.9 |
| Dust2 | 37 | 54% | 1.07 | 18.6 |
| Overpass | 19 | 68% | 1.27 | 15.4 |
| Nuke | 13 | 23% | 0.92 | 13.3 |
| Inferno | 12 | 33% | 0.84 | 14.8 |
| Train | 4 | 50% | 0.99 | 16.0 |
| Anubis | 4 | 25% | 0.91 | 15.5 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3445 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.4054% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ancient | 0–3 | -0.01 | 33% | 29 Aug → | |
| mirage | 12–16 | 0.01 | 14% | 28 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–4 | 0.02 | 12% | 27 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–0 | -0.05 | 27% | 27 Aug → | |
| cache | 4–13 | -0.02 | 27% | 27 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | -0.01 | 18% | 27 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 2–13 | -0.12 | 22% | 26 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.05 | 21% | 26 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.04 | 28% | 26 Aug → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 25 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–9 | 0.01 | 24% | 24 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.04 | 31% | 24 Aug → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | 0.06 | 33% | 24 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | -0.02 | 31% | 24 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–9 | 0.02 | 20% | 23 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | -0.04 | 25% | 23 Aug → | |
| anubis | 13–10 | 0.01 | 8% | 23 Aug → | |
| cache | 5–13 | -0.03 | 37% | 23 Aug → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | -0.01 | 19% | 23 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | -0.03 | 25% | 23 Aug → | |
| anubis | 13–10 | 0.01 | 24% | 23 Aug → | |
| anubis | 13–2 | 0.06 | 22% | 22 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | -0.03 | 28% | 22 Aug → | |
| anubis | 10–13 | -0.01 | 16% | 22 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–8 | -0.01 | 22% | 21 Aug → | |
| ancient | 16–14 | 0.01 | 13% | 20 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | -0.01 | 18% | 16 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–2 | 0.10 | 50% | 16 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–6 | 0.03 | 24% | 16 Aug → | |
| ancient | 14–16 | -0.01 | 17% | 16 Aug → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.06 | 28% | 16 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–4 | 0.07 | 21% | 16 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | -0.02 | 13% | 16 Aug → | |
| nuke | 1–13 | 0.01 | 9% | 15 Aug → | |
| cache | 2–13 | -0.07 | 35% | 15 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–9 | 0.00 | 21% | 10 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | -0.05 | 18% | 10 Aug → | |
| cache | 7–13 | 0.01 | 35% | 8 Aug → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | -0.06 | 30% | 7 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | -0.03 | 11% | 7 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–7 | 0.08 | 33% | 7 Aug → | |
| cache | 8–13 | -0.05 | 13% | 7 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–10 | -0.03 | 28% | 4 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | -0.02 | 33% | 4 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | -0.04 | 18% | 3 Aug → | |
| anubis | 3–8 | -0.08 | 15% | 31 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.07 | 18% | 28 Jul → | |
| cache | 8–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 28 Jul → | |
| cache | 2–13 | -0.04 | 25% | 28 Jul → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | 0.02 | 13% | 19 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.03 | 14% | 19 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.00 | 30% | 18 Jul → | |
| cache | 5–13 | 0.04 | 20% | 18 Jul → | |
| mirage | 15–15 | 0.04 | 15% | 11 Jul → | |
| cache | 15–15 | 0.02 | 24% | 10 Jul → | |
| cache | 5–1 | 0.26 | 40% | 7 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.04 | 20% | 5 Jul → | |
| overpass | 15–15 | 0.03 | 23% | 5 Jul → | |
| anubis | 11–13 | -0.00 | 21% | 5 Jul → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.03 | 27% | 5 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–8 | -0.04 | 25% | 5 Jul → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | -0.02 | 27% | 4 Jul → | |
| mirage | 2–11 | -0.05 | 24% | 4 Jul → | |
| nuke | 14–16 | -0.03 | 17% | 4 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 3–13 | -0.10 | 27% | 3 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | -0.04 | 21% | 3 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 8–13 | -0.04 | 27% | 3 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.08 | 27% | 3 Jul → | |
| mirage | 1–7 | 0.06 | 0% | 2 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | -0.01 | 20% | 2 Jul → | |
| anubis | 11–13 | -0.03 | 12% | 2 Jul → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | 0.08 | 30% | 2 Jul → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | 0.01 | 22% | 30 Jun → | |
| overpass | 13–2 | 0.02 | 18% | 29 Jun → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.07 | 38% | 24 May → | |
| anubis | 13–3 | 0.03 | 13% | 20 May → | |
| dust2 | 13–5 | -0.06 | 13% | 20 May → | |
| anubis | 5–13 | -0.00 | 24% | 18 May → | |
| cache | 12–12 | 0.00 | 27% | 18 May → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.01 | 24% | 18 May → | |
| cache | 10–13 | 0.05 | 32% | 18 May → | |
| cache | 11–13 | 0.01 | 29% | 10 May → | |
| cache | 9–13 | 0.05 | 44% | 10 May → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.02 | 24% | 6 May → | |
| cache | 13–6 | -0.01 | 16% | 6 May → | |
| cache | 13–4 | -0.00 | 26% | 3 May → | |
| cache | 1–10 | -0.04 | 31% | 3 May → | |
| cache | 6–13 | 0.00 | 28% | 1 May → | |
| cache | 13–1 | 0.04 | 35% | 1 May → | |
| cache | 13–2 | 0.04 | 45% | 1 May → | |
| cache | 7–13 | 0.06 | 24% | 30 Apr → | |
| cache | 7–13 | 0.13 | 31% | 30 Apr → | |
| cache | 13–8 | 0.01 | 38% | 30 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 8–13 | -0.07 | 25% | 26 Apr → | |
| overpass | 13–5 | 0.04 | 20% | 26 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.12 | 51% | 20 Apr → | |
| anubis | 8–13 | -0.02 | 52% | 20 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 13–4 | 0.01 | 38% | 20 Apr → | |
| overpass | 8–13 | -0.13 | 9% | 12 Apr → | |
| anubis | 8–13 | 0.04 | 29% | 12 Apr → |
Match data via Leetify.
