Cow

Cow — CS2 Stats

US76561198202030380[U:1:241764652]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

872Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,281Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,596Blue band · top ~35.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5476 of 7952 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 906 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCowFACEITLevel 4 · 906 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER13,596 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning43
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4951Last 10049%Win rateLWWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression3.6
Utility2.5
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.3
Utility2.5
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time622ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — inferno 9–2
133Biggest win — anubis
8Longest win streak
1012In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 56% over 18dust2Weakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1810856%0.01
mirageB158753%0.00
dust2C156940%-0.00
nukeC146843%-0.01
anubisB137654%0.04
cacheB126650%-0.01
infernoB126650%0.00
vertigo1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

32,796Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
1,982Matches
42.8%Match win rate
38.1%Headshot %
11.5%Shot accuracy
4,002MVPs
671Hours (in match)
1,899Bombs planted
605Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,425dust2
1,518inferno
1,153nuke
544train
415vertigo
120cbble
80office
49bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

66Matches
44%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
84.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1644%1.0615.1
Dust2850%1.2317.0
Ancient743%1.0418.9
Inferno560%1.0915.4
Nuke520%1.1721.2
Overpass540%1.4422.6
Train3100%1.8912.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
606msReaction time
17.6%T opening success
51.0%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
0.7%Flash assists
6.06HE damage / grenade
3.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2661 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.5848% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–13-0.0612%27 Aug
nuke13–60.0315%26 Aug
anubis13–80.1114%26 Aug
cache13–5-0.0138%25 Aug
mirage14–160.0121%25 Aug
nuke10–130.0320%25 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0114%25 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0113%25 Aug
cache13–70.0020%20 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0213%18 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0318%18 Aug
cache1–13-0.0814%13 Aug
anubis13–70.0629%13 Aug
mirage3–13-0.059%10 Aug
nuke10–130.0519%8 Aug
mirage13–80.0410%8 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0411%8 Aug
mirage11–130.0316%4 Aug
anubis11–130.0714%4 Aug
ancient5–130.0111%3 Aug
dust210–13-0.0616%30 Jul
cache13–70.0819%30 Jul
anubis13–50.0312%30 Jul
dust26–13-0.0118%30 Jul
inferno9–20.1913%29 Jul
nuke9–30.0419%29 Jul
ancient13–60.0913%29 Jul
dust213–110.0518%29 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0419%29 Jul
inferno9–130.0215%29 Jul
dust210–13-0.019%27 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0023%27 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0815%27 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0718%26 Jul
nuke0–2-0.120%26 Jul
dust25–13-0.0117%26 Jul
dust213–90.0816%26 Jul
ancient13–100.0718%25 Jul
cache13–11-0.0412%25 Jul
dust213–8-0.0023%25 Jul
vertigo5–13-0.0624%25 Jul
mirage2–130.0214%22 Jul
inferno9–7-0.0412%22 Jul
cache6–13-0.057%22 Jul
cache9–130.0122%21 Jul
anubis13–110.0115%21 Jul
mirage13–60.0524%20 Jul
cache6–13-0.0418%20 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0222%20 Jul
anubis13–30.1114%20 Jul
ancient13–90.019%20 Jul
cache13–50.039%20 Jul
nuke13–80.0320%20 Jul
ancient13–110.0218%18 Jul
ancient13–90.0218%16 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0113%15 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0212%15 Jul
anubis9–13-0.019%14 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0212%14 Jul
ancient13–110.0723%14 Jul
anubis10–130.0217%13 Jul
anubis9–130.0827%12 Jul
cache11–13-0.0317%12 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0110%12 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0621%12 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0517%11 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0626%11 Jul
dust25–13-0.018%11 Jul
cache13–50.1014%11 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0116%11 Jul
dust213–110.0413%10 Jul
ancient10–130.0120%10 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0214%9 Jul
mirage13–40.0015%9 Jul
dust25–13-0.0811%9 Jul
dust213–10-0.0212%9 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0219%9 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0016%9 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0120%8 Jul
cache9–13-0.0622%7 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0412%4 Jul
dust213–40.0520%4 Jul
inferno13–100.028%2 Jul
dust210–13-0.0313%2 Jul
mirage11–130.0219%29 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0714%26 Jun
nuke4–13-0.059%26 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0323%25 Jun
anubis13–40.1316%25 Jun
inferno9–60.0217%24 Jun
dust29–130.0311%24 Jun
inferno9–130.029%23 Jun
mirage3–130.0116%23 Jun
ancient13–50.0315%18 Jun
dust27–13-0.0613%17 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0016%17 Jun
nuke13–80.0212%16 Jun
ancient16–140.0218%16 Jun
inferno16–120.0419%16 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0413%15 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →