sebix — CS2 Stats

76561198180905898[U:1:220640170]

1,043Tracked matches28%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,859Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,817 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate43.5%49.0%52.0%8.6% short
Shot accuracy16.8%13.1%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.001.081.080.08 short
Match win rate41.4%46.9%48.8%7.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsebixFACEITLevel 9 · 1,817 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning45
Utility19

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD33589Last 10033%Win rateWLLLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression5.9
Utility1.9
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch4.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.5
Utility1.9
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time560ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — warden 13–6
133Biggest win — fachwerk
4Longest win streak
42In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheD2041620%-0.00
nukeC156940%-0.01
trainA85363%0.01
anubisD71614%-0.02
alpineA74357%-0.00
vertigoD62433%0.03
infernoD62433%0.01
wardenC52340%0.02
dust241325%-0.04
mirage4040%-0.01
fachwerk31233%-0.04
overpass330100%0.03
ancient31233%-0.01
boulder21150%-0.00
office2020%-0.03
stronghold2020%0.01
shelter1010%0.03
golden1010%0.03
palacio1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

110,077Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
6,362Matches
41.4%Match win rate
43.5%Headshot %
16.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
12,402MVPs
2,238Hours (in match)
6,279Bombs planted
1,151Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4733,922
AWP16,576
Negev2,884
Knife2,540
FAMAS2,181
SSG 082,160

Lifetime map wins

10,148nuke
5,585dust2
4,447inferno
3,257train
2,432vertigo
1,005cbble
335office
283italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

184Matches
57%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
87.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23964%1.2617.4
Mirage3152%1.3317.2
Nuke3067%1.3520.1
Inferno2055%1.2016.1
Train1669%1.2716.9
Ancient1362%1.1616.4
Overpass1155%1.1017.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
551msReaction time
38.0%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.26Enemies flashed / flash
0.6%Flash assists
6.52HE damage / grenade
2.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.262 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.9757% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–50.0423%27 Aug
cache10–130.0514%27 Aug
fachwerk4–13-0.0919%27 Aug
cache9–13-0.0520%21 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0120%20 Aug
train13–80.0723%12 Aug
train3–13-0.0038%12 Aug
fachwerk6–13-0.0221%10 Aug
cache11–130.0621%10 Aug
boulder13–80.0519%7 Aug
overpass13–70.0926%7 Aug
nuke10–130.0216%6 Aug
cache12–12-0.0116%6 Aug
anubis13–70.0241%28 Jul
cache2–13-0.1113%22 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0119%22 Jul
nuke0–13-0.040%22 Jul
vertigo3–13-0.0232%17 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0321%15 Jul
boulder3–13-0.0610%15 Jul
shelter8–130.0322%9 Jul
office5–130.0138%9 Jul
fachwerk13–3-0.0123%8 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0016%2 Jul
ancient2–10-0.0121%1 Jul
cache6–130.0321%1 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0325%25 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0321%24 Jun
dust26–130.0230%24 Jun
alpine13–70.0335%18 Jun
train13–5-0.0629%17 Jun
inferno13–70.0625%10 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0330%10 Jun
nuke12–120.0620%8 Jun
anubis12–160.0018%8 Jun
cache2–13-0.0120%8 Jun
warden13–60.1027%3 Jun
vertigo13–70.1023%3 Jun
vertigo13–10-0.0140%3 Jun
inferno11–130.0420%28 May
alpine6–13-0.0422%28 May
cache9–13-0.0417%27 May
anubis3–13-0.0913%27 May
alpine10–13-0.0112%24 May
cache12–12-0.0415%20 May
office6–13-0.0733%13 May
cache12–120.0228%12 May
cache10–130.0213%12 May
cache5–13-0.0618%6 May
cache13–80.0034%6 May
dust26–13-0.0224%4 May
cache8–13-0.0513%4 May
cache10–13-0.0323%29 Apr
cache13–8-0.0143%29 Apr
cache7–130.0927%29 Apr
cache13–100.0728%28 Apr
cache8–13-0.0121%28 Apr
anubis3–130.0017%28 Apr
mirage5–130.0246%28 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0520%28 Apr
stronghold8–13-0.0239%28 Apr
warden3–13-0.0034%22 Apr
train13–100.0524%22 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0129%21 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0115%21 Apr
alpine3–13-0.0821%20 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0254%20 Apr
vertigo7–130.0219%19 Apr
alpine13–70.0231%16 Apr
warden13–80.0622%16 Apr
inferno12–12-0.0125%8 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0545%8 Apr
vertigo12–120.0921%2 Apr
nuke13–110.0425%27 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0522%26 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0122%26 Mar
vertigo12–120.0330%25 Mar
ancient12–12-0.0412%25 Mar
train9–130.0528%25 Mar
nuke13–40.0427%25 Mar
anubis1–13-0.0941%11 Mar
warden10–13-0.0520%11 Mar
alpine13–50.0624%24 Jan
warden8–13-0.0014%24 Jan
stronghold12–120.0316%22 Jan
alpine13–8-0.0028%22 Jan
train13–110.0519%6 Jan
golden5–130.0323%6 Jan
mirage9–130.0323%6 Jan
ancient13–50.0114%27 Dec
train8–130.0019%27 Dec
train13–6-0.0616%25 Dec
nuke13–16-0.0318%25 Dec
palacio7–130.0114%24 Dec
dust213–6-0.0815%23 Dec
dust27–13-0.0723%20 Dec
nuke5–13-0.0214%20 Dec
nuke13–90.0317%18 Dec
overpass13–100.0121%18 Dec
inferno13–160.0122%17 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →