Klausur⚡

Klausur⚡ — CS2 Stats

NO76561198174761398[U:1:214495670]Steam profile ↗

2,524Tracked matches46%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,665Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,237Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9726 of 35633 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,364 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate79.9%46.2%47.2%above
Shot accuracy3.2%12.5%12.3%9.2% short
Kill/death ratio2.521.061.07above
Match win rate45.9%45.9%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKlausur⚡FACEITLevel 7 · 1,364 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,237 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning33
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55396Last 10055%Win rateWLLLLWWLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.1
Aggression2.1
Utility3.8
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 57 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning3.3
Utility3.8
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time569ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy26.5%−5.3%
first ⅓ avg 31.8% → last ⅓ avg 26.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — inferno 9–3
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
114In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 88% over 8nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB30161453%0.01
cacheB179853%0.02
infernoS118373%0.06
ancientS87188%-0.01
nukeC83538%0.01
anubisA85363%0.03
trainA85363%-0.00
overpass41325%0.03
dust231233%0.01
office2020%0.00
vertigo1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

178,576Lifetime kills
2.52K/D · Top 1% of Level 7 players
3,491Matches
45.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
79.9%Headshot % · Top 1% of Level 7 players
3.2%Shot accuracy
9,815MVPs
1,333Hours (in match)
3,313Bombs planted
1,258Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47122,536
AWP8,900
MP92,931
FAMAS2,807
MAC-101,158

Lifetime map wins

3,312inferno
2,713dust2
1,869nuke
1,568vertigo
866train
665office
121lake
46cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

383Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
73.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15660%1.1215.2
Anubis5145%1.0413.5
Ancient4533%0.9815.3
Nuke3956%1.1614.3
Dust23247%0.9213.8
Inferno2232%1.1816.6
Overpass1191%1.1716.8
Vertigo944%1.2314.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.3%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
89.5%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
562msReaction time
22.7%T opening success
20.5%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
7.29HE damage / grenade
5.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4398 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.699% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–8-0.0527%23 Aug
cache2–130.0118%23 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0219%23 Aug
mirage5–130.0217%23 Aug
dust25–13-0.0412%23 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0321%19 Aug
mirage13–110.0223%19 Aug
cache12–16-0.0322%18 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0045%17 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0218%17 Aug
anubis13–80.0125%17 Aug
mirage13–00.0128%16 Aug
mirage16–120.0829%16 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0215%15 Aug
cache13–110.0832%15 Aug
office9–13-0.0515%14 Aug
mirage13–70.0353%14 Aug
mirage7–130.0227%14 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0621%12 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0713%11 Aug
dust210–130.0424%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0725%10 Aug
mirage13–10.0413%10 Aug
mirage5–3-0.0520%10 Aug
nuke13–80.0521%6 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0329%6 Aug
office9–130.0653%6 Aug
cache7–13-0.0122%5 Aug
inferno6–90.0442%4 Aug
inferno9–20.0250%4 Aug
overpass6–90.0227%4 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0026%3 Aug
train8–13-0.0443%2 Aug
train13–100.0152%1 Aug
mirage13–90.0426%1 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0020%1 Aug
ancient13–110.0226%1 Aug
mirage7–130.0129%1 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0321%28 Jul
train13–5-0.0134%27 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0145%27 Jul
ancient13–100.0219%25 Jul
anubis13–70.0727%25 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0216%25 Jul
cache13–70.0828%18 Jul
anubis15–150.0229%18 Jul
mirage13–90.0538%18 Jul
cache13–50.0125%18 Jul
cache16–14-0.0528%17 Jul
mirage7–130.0959%17 Jul
nuke13–80.0627%12 Jul
cache13–20.1435%12 Jul
mirage13–90.0223%12 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0116%12 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0123%12 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0510%9 Jul
anubis10–130.0531%9 Jul
train13–1-0.0322%9 Jul
train5–13-0.0831%9 Jul
anubis13–30.0343%9 Jul
mirage8–13-0.1017%9 Jul
mirage13–110.1221%8 Jul
cache13–110.037%8 Jul
dust211–00.0447%6 Jul
train13–10.0443%6 Jul
inferno9–70.0228%6 Jul
inferno9–30.1941%6 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0232%4 Jul
cache13–50.0036%4 Jul
train13–70.0433%4 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0224%3 Jul
ancient13–60.0629%3 Jul
mirage13–110.0429%2 Jul
overpass13–110.0425%2 Jul
cache6–13-0.0138%2 Jul
overpass15–150.0028%1 Jul
inferno13–90.0533%1 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0746%1 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0622%1 Jul
cache6–13-0.0429%30 Jun
mirage13–50.0832%30 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0632%30 Jun
train10–130.0339%12 Jun
cache11–130.0723%12 Jun
anubis13–00.0533%12 Jun
vertigo4–9-0.0232%12 Jun
inferno4–9-0.0732%12 Jun
inferno9–50.1727%11 Jun
inferno9–20.1443%11 Jun
inferno9–30.1038%10 Jun
nuke8–80.1524%10 Jun
overpass7–90.0729%10 Jun
cache10–130.0519%10 Jun
cache13–9-0.0328%10 Jun
mirage13–70.0737%7 Jun
cache9–130.0326%6 Jun
inferno9–40.0424%6 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0230%6 Jun
mirage13–100.0435%6 Jun
cache13–30.0461%6 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →