Tan Suit Biden

Tan Suit Biden — CS2 Stats

US76561198172103427[U:1:211837699]Steam profile ↗

593Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
426Hours in CS
CSDB Rating2.5 Learning
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTan Suit BidenFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim22
Positioning33
Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38548Last 10038%Win rateLLLLTLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.2
Aggression0.9
Utility2.1
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 60% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 698ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.2
Positioning3.3
Utility2.1
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact2.6

Composite 2.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time702ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 700ms → last ⅓ avg 702ms
Headshot accuracy11.1%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 12.3% → last ⅓ avg 11.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — inferno 9–1
132Biggest win — italy
6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
49In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8nukeWeakest map · 32% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD1961332%-0.05
infernoC156940%-0.03
officeC125742%-0.01
vertigoC114736%-0.03
overpassD93633%-0.03
ancientA85363%-0.02
cacheC73443%-0.04
anubisA53260%-0.02
mirage41325%-0.05
train41325%-0.02
dust23030%-0.05
italy21150%-0.04
poseidon1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

30,562Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
1,399Matches
36.5%Match win rate
50.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
11.0%Shot accuracy
2,588MVPs
426Hours (in match)
1,160Bombs planted
257Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,526nuke
1,395dust2
1,340inferno
470train
377office
372vertigo
148cbble
91lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

12Matches
25%Win rate
0.62Avg K/D
62.1ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10%0.5013.0
Anubis10%0.8916.0
Inferno10%0.479.0
Ancient1100%0.8511.0
Overpass10%0.8020.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.4%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
67.7%Counter-strafing
15.4°Preaim
698msReaction time
21.0%T opening success
25.5%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
4.24HE damage / grenade
4.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 15.3834° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.4224% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3582 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office3–13-0.0324%9 Aug
inferno7–13-0.067%8 Aug
nuke7–9-0.0929%7 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1013%7 Aug
nuke15–15-0.083%5 Aug
ancient11–13-0.029%5 Aug
office13–90.0416%3 Aug
overpass13–10-0.0515%3 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.018%29 Jul
cache9–13-0.058%28 Jul
inferno7–13-0.079%28 Jul
nuke2–13-0.1024%27 Jul
ancient13–6-0.047%27 Jul
cache13–70.0210%27 Jul
vertigo13–11-0.0720%27 Jul
anubis3–13-0.049%27 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0611%26 Jul
ancient13–11-0.015%26 Jul
cache13–16-0.041%25 Jul
ancient8–13-0.017%25 Jul
nuke16–13-0.078%23 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0812%15 Jul
office13–10-0.0917%16 Jun
nuke13–5-0.019%12 Jun
office6–13-0.032%12 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0217%11 Jun
nuke11–130.0517%11 Jun
anubis13–4-0.037%8 Jun
inferno3–13-0.036%25 May
vertigo9–130.0313%25 May
vertigo12–12-0.0410%20 May
office13–70.0511%20 May
vertigo13–90.032%11 May
office11–13-0.0312%10 May
nuke9–13-0.083%6 May
office6–13-0.0417%4 May
nuke7–13-0.057%4 May
nuke2–13-0.0410%30 Apr
office9–13-0.038%30 Apr
cache13–5-0.0110%30 Apr
cache3–13-0.0315%29 Apr
cache13–9-0.0714%29 Apr
cache10–13-0.0916%29 Apr
vertigo3–13-0.059%26 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0512%26 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0418%26 Apr
train13–50.012%26 Apr
train7–13-0.064%25 Apr
dust211–13-0.0010%25 Apr
vertigo12–12-0.087%24 Apr
overpass3–13-0.0323%24 Apr
train11–13-0.0611%24 Apr
nuke5–13-0.087%23 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0014%23 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0812%22 Apr
italy13–2-0.0117%21 Apr
dust25–13-0.0518%21 Apr
inferno5–13-0.1112%21 Apr
vertigo12–12-0.019%20 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0510%19 Apr
office0–13-0.100%19 Apr
overpass2–13-0.0518%19 Apr
italy6–13-0.0713%19 Apr
ancient11–13-0.014%19 Apr
overpass13–5-0.0411%14 Apr
vertigo13–8-0.0417%14 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0211%14 Apr
nuke9–60.0512%12 Apr
vertigo9–70.0216%12 Apr
inferno9–50.0215%12 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0711%12 Apr
nuke13–4-0.0512%11 Apr
anubis13–70.018%11 Apr
inferno2–9-0.214%11 Apr
nuke5–9-0.1010%11 Apr
inferno9–10.2015%11 Apr
inferno8–80.1214%11 Apr
poseidon3–9-0.0712%9 Apr
nuke2–9-0.123%9 Apr
vertigo7–9-0.0920%9 Apr
inferno9–6-0.0813%9 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0116%9 Apr
overpass0–7-0.0111%7 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0519%7 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0311%7 Apr
anubis13–20.0217%6 Apr
ancient13–4-0.024%6 Apr
anubis12–12-0.078%6 Apr
train12–120.0217%6 Apr
office13–30.0914%5 Apr
office13–30.0316%5 Apr
inferno7–9-0.099%5 Apr
inferno9–70.025%5 Apr
nuke9–5-0.019%5 Apr
inferno9–4-0.0016%5 Apr
office12–12-0.0210%4 Apr
dust25–13-0.0919%4 Apr
overpass13–9-0.0312%4 Apr
inferno13–70.0219%4 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0310%3 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →