nofun

nofun — CS2 Stats

PL76561198162493006[U:1:202227278]Steam profile ↗

1,250Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,518Hours in CS41Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,933Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7340 of 23382 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,094 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.4%44.2%44.9%meets
Shot accuracy9.6%11.2%11.8%2.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.941.041.040.10 short
Match win rate42.8%45.3%45.3%2.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnofunFACEITLevel 5 · 1,094 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,933 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning44
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55432Last 10055%Win rateLWLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression7.7
Utility3.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.4
Utility3.0
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time511ms−114ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 511ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–3
131Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 45% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB2091145%-0.00
nukeA2011955%0.01
ancientB1991047%0.02
cacheS1510567%0.01
dust2B136746%-0.03
mirageS86275%0.00
infernoS54180%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

62,764Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
3,651Matches
42.8%Match win rate
44.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
9.6%Shot accuracy
7,298MVPs
1,269Hours (in match)
2,763Bombs planted
687Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,677
AWP7,219
MP91,426
P901,198
MAC-101,089

Lifetime map wins

5,415nuke
4,389dust2
1,393train
1,128inferno
821vertigo
61cbble
55office
10lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

88Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
85.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1850%1.3017.6
Ancient1560%1.2318.7
Mirage1547%0.8716.3
Dust21354%1.0919.1
Nuke850%1.2619.1
Overpass367%0.9821.3
Cache30%0.9216.0
Inferno250%1.0715.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
502msReaction time
35.7%T opening success
50.7%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
1.8%Flash assists
6.25HE damage / grenade
3.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3654 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.703% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0641%28 Aug
mirage13–110.0115%24 Aug
anubis9–130.0029%24 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0413%24 Aug
anubis1–130.0315%24 Aug
dust29–13-0.0517%23 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0324%23 Aug
cache13–8-0.0020%23 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0311%23 Aug
cache13–2-0.0130%23 Aug
mirage13–6-0.048%22 Aug
cache13–7-0.0327%22 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0224%22 Aug
dust213–11-0.0234%22 Aug
dust27–130.0027%20 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0415%20 Aug
nuke13–110.0631%19 Aug
anubis13–80.0727%18 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0123%18 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0122%17 Aug
ancient13–90.0516%17 Aug
mirage13–30.0523%17 Aug
dust21–13-0.1027%17 Aug
ancient8–130.0118%17 Aug
cache13–90.0023%16 Aug
cache13–110.0032%15 Aug
mirage10–130.0124%15 Aug
inferno13–1-0.0711%15 Aug
anubis13–40.0118%15 Aug
nuke16–130.0111%15 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0120%13 Aug
anubis13–90.0120%13 Aug
cache16–140.0219%13 Aug
cache11–13-0.0122%12 Aug
dust26–13-0.0123%11 Aug
ancient10–130.0115%11 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0621%10 Aug
dust20–4-0.090%10 Aug
nuke13–5-0.046%10 Aug
cache8–130.0218%9 Aug
dust216–12-0.0018%7 Aug
anubis9–130.0114%7 Aug
anubis4–130.0115%7 Aug
nuke15–150.0015%6 Aug
ancient13–70.0422%6 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0213%6 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0616%6 Aug
ancient13–80.0824%5 Aug
anubis13–70.0516%5 Aug
dust213–80.0124%5 Aug
nuke11–130.0217%5 Aug
cache13–160.0231%4 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0524%4 Aug
nuke13–80.1030%4 Aug
dust213–3-0.0526%4 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0318%3 Aug
nuke13–80.0727%3 Aug
ancient16–130.0319%3 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0429%3 Aug
ancient13–30.0735%3 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0720%2 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0219%2 Aug
ancient5–130.0234%2 Aug
nuke13–40.0114%2 Aug
nuke13–90.0620%2 Aug
ancient10–130.0016%2 Aug
anubis13–80.0314%2 Aug
dust212–16-0.076%1 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0231%1 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0119%1 Aug
cache13–60.0721%1 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0218%1 Aug
dust213–9-0.0121%31 Jul
ancient13–40.0720%31 Jul
cache13–20.0318%31 Jul
cache2–13-0.0918%31 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0223%31 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0724%30 Jul
dust29–13-0.059%30 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0115%30 Jul
anubis6–130.0324%30 Jul
nuke13–40.0715%29 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0118%29 Jul
ancient13–30.1527%28 Jul
mirage13–70.0633%27 Jul
dust213–10-0.0122%27 Jul
nuke13–70.0714%27 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0324%27 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0514%27 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0213%27 Jul
nuke12–160.0318%27 Jul
ancient10–130.0414%26 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0220%26 Jul
nuke13–70.0412%26 Jul
cache13–11-0.0118%26 Jul
inferno13–60.0533%26 Jul
cache6–130.0121%25 Jul
cache13–10.0717%25 Jul
mirage13–110.0114%25 Jul
ancient13–60.0216%25 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →