Fl0wCZ — CS2 Stats

76561198153961049[U:1:193695321]

871Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,465Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidEntry Fragger
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning64
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51427Last 10051%Win rateLWLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.4
Aggression10.0
Utility5.4
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels6.1
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: higher opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 44% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time568ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — cache 13–3
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC1871139%0.01
cacheC1871139%0.03
mirageA1610663%0.02
dust2B126650%0.02
anubisA117464%0.04
ancientA106460%0.03
nukeA85363%0.03
office32167%-0.01
overpass21150%0.00
italy1010%0.04
fachwerk1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

100,835Lifetime kills
1.83K/D · Top 5% of tracked players
3,310Matches
53.9%Match win rate · Top 10% of tracked players
51.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
12.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
6,379MVPs
1,116Hours (in match)
2,808Bombs planted
1,118Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,023
AWP10,702
MAC-102,824
AUG2,140
MP92,097

Lifetime map wins

4,452dust2
3,098inferno
2,344nuke
1,420vertigo
1,136train
1,094office
279lake
223italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

91Matches
54%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
75.1ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2050%1.1814.8
Ancient1450%1.0117.4
Mirage1080%1.2014.2
Cache757%1.1112.4
Nuke729%1.1417.1
Overpass580%1.0416.8
Dust240%0.669.5
Anubis450%0.9712.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
566msReaction time
43.8%T opening success
64.8%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
10.79HE damage / grenade
8.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4578 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno14–16-0.0118%26 Aug
mirage13–90.0452%26 Aug
inferno13–160.0631%25 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0327%24 Aug
mirage13–80.0023%24 Aug
dust213–50.0625%24 Aug
dust25–13-0.059%20 Aug
nuke13–110.0921%19 Aug
ancient19–160.0321%18 Aug
dust213–40.1025%18 Aug
mirage13–20.1223%17 Aug
inferno13–70.0319%13 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0220%13 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0416%5 Aug
nuke13–110.0240%4 Aug
mirage13–40.0114%4 Aug
ancient14–160.0419%30 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0210%30 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0225%27 Jul
anubis13–60.0728%26 Jul
nuke13–160.0822%26 Jul
inferno9–130.0024%26 Jul
mirage14–160.0614%24 Jul
italy5–130.0420%22 Jul
mirage13–80.0717%22 Jul
anubis11–30.0331%22 Jul
cache11–13-0.0615%21 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0315%20 Jul
ancient13–90.0315%20 Jul
dust211–130.0423%19 Jul
anubis13–30.1124%19 Jul
cache8–130.0529%16 Jul
nuke13–60.0224%13 Jul
ancient8–130.0125%13 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0125%12 Jul
cache12–120.1014%12 Jul
anubis10–130.1022%12 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0318%12 Jul
fachwerk12–120.0326%12 Jul
inferno13–110.0522%12 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0033%11 Jul
cache13–90.0711%7 Jul
anubis13–100.1013%5 Jul
office4–13-0.0417%5 Jul
cache11–130.0227%5 Jul
dust213–80.0922%5 Jul
nuke13–80.0215%5 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0119%3 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0125%3 Jul
cache13–70.1119%3 Jul
office13–60.0116%3 Jul
dust29–130.0335%3 Jul
inferno13–100.0322%20 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0510%20 Jun
inferno13–80.0412%20 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0211%18 Jun
anubis13–90.0616%13 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0213%13 Jun
mirage9–130.0916%12 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0029%10 Jun
ancient13–60.0520%5 Jun
dust22–13-0.0717%5 Jun
cache13–30.1727%5 Jun
mirage5–13-0.029%5 Jun
dust213–10-0.0119%4 Jun
mirage12–120.0320%2 Jun
cache2–13-0.0929%30 May
inferno13–80.0931%30 May
ancient12–120.1124%30 May
ancient12–12-0.0218%25 May
anubis13–40.0415%25 May
dust210–130.0828%23 May
cache11–130.0218%23 May
nuke0–4-0.0144%23 May
nuke9–130.0235%22 May
cache10–13-0.0313%20 May
inferno9–130.0331%17 May
cache6–130.0322%14 May
dust213–60.0428%14 May
mirage13–00.0813%9 May
cache12–120.0827%9 May
cache12–12-0.0620%6 May
overpass3–13-0.0418%6 May
cache13–30.0126%6 May
dust213–4-0.0215%3 May
office13–8-0.0122%3 May
cache13–100.0421%3 May
cache13–80.0525%30 Apr
overpass13–100.0424%30 Apr
cache10–130.0316%29 Apr
cache13–110.049%29 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0418%28 Apr
inferno16–130.0728%28 Apr
dust26–130.0125%27 Apr
mirage13–80.0119%27 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0313%25 Apr
inferno19–15-0.0515%22 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0536%21 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0248%21 Apr
ancient16–140.0715%21 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →