TR1LLCTRL

TR1LLCTRL — CS2 Stats

US76561198149415258[U:1:189149530]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,377Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,353Hours in CS59Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3373 of 22872 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,444 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate40.9%46.2%47.2%6.3% short
Shot accuracy15.4%12.5%12.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.261.061.07above
Match win rate43.0%45.9%46.3%3.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTR1LLCTRLFACEITLevel 7 · 1,444 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning49
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48448Last 10048%Win rateWLTLWLWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression6.1
Utility4.5
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.9
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time495ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 495ms
Headshot accuracy26.7%+5.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 26.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — nuke 1–1
132Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C30131743%0.01
mirageB21101148%0.00
cacheA159660%-0.00
infernoB147750%0.03
nukeD62433%0.05
ancientS54180%-0.01
anubis41325%-0.01
overpass2020%0.02
train21150%0.01
vertigo110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

194,857Lifetime kills
1.26K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
9,381Matches
43.0%Match win rate
40.9%Headshot %
15.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
19,146MVPs
3,559Hours (in match)
7,073Bombs planted
2,247Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP46,417
AK-4745,342
SSG 089,232
SG 5535,394
MAG-74,488

Lifetime map wins

27,392dust2
11,649inferno
5,212nuke
2,669vertigo
1,096train
282office
68cbble
29safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.7%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
496msReaction time
21.0%T opening success
51.6%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
7.78HE damage / grenade
11.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4663 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.9706% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–100.0423%29 Aug
cache10–130.0228%29 Aug
dust212–120.0230%29 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0219%29 Aug
inferno13–70.0341%29 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0932%28 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0225%28 Aug
cache15–15-0.046%28 Aug
inferno5–6-0.038%28 Aug
cache7–13-0.0028%28 Aug
dust23–13-0.0519%28 Aug
mirage13–70.0129%28 Aug
overpass9–130.0524%28 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0614%28 Aug
cache13–40.0031%27 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0430%27 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0118%26 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0029%26 Aug
cache9–130.0828%26 Aug
dust213–30.0230%26 Aug
cache3–00.040%26 Aug
mirage13–110.0135%23 Aug
dust29–130.0132%22 Aug
cache13–11-0.0329%22 Aug
dust213–100.0533%22 Aug
dust26–130.0321%22 Aug
dust28–130.0521%22 Aug
dust213–9-0.0124%21 Aug
inferno10–130.0720%21 Aug
inferno15–150.0114%21 Aug
nuke1–10.21100%21 Aug
dust214–16-0.0126%20 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0036%19 Aug
cache13–11-0.0412%18 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0122%18 Aug
dust216–120.0218%17 Aug
ancient13–20.0015%17 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0022%16 Aug
mirage13–40.0329%16 Aug
ancient13–100.0113%16 Aug
anubis9–130.0415%16 Aug
vertigo13–70.0525%16 Aug
train13–110.0117%16 Aug
nuke13–110.1825%15 Aug
dust28–130.0125%14 Aug
dust212–120.0015%14 Aug
cache9–4-0.0530%11 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0122%3 Aug
inferno13–100.0427%3 Aug
train11–130.0117%3 Aug
dust216–140.0223%2 Aug
inferno13–40.1628%2 Aug
cache3–13-0.0529%2 Aug
dust212–120.0331%2 Aug
inferno13–40.1128%1 Aug
mirage13–70.1024%31 Jul
dust211–130.0328%31 Jul
cache13–60.0425%31 Jul
mirage12–120.0329%31 Jul
mirage11–13-0.079%28 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0517%27 Jul
dust27–3-0.110%27 Jul
dust213–100.0337%27 Jul
dust216–13-0.0213%27 Jul
mirage13–90.0125%27 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0318%26 Jul
mirage3–9-0.059%25 Jun
mirage13–70.0933%25 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0228%24 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0514%24 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0322%24 Jun
dust213–110.0024%23 Jun
mirage13–50.1119%23 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0019%23 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0319%23 Jun
mirage13–60.0920%23 Jun
dust213–70.1018%23 Jun
cache13–30.0520%23 Jun
cache13–100.0015%22 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0418%21 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0326%20 Jun
dust26–13-0.1033%20 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0314%20 Jun
cache2–13-0.0320%20 Jun
cache13–5-0.0021%20 Jun
dust213–9-0.0114%20 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0412%20 Jun
dust28–13-0.0218%20 Jun
dust24–13-0.0236%19 Jun
inferno13–40.1123%19 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0218%19 Jun
inferno13–80.0313%18 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0717%17 Jun
dust213–100.0618%17 Jun
dust29–13-0.0421%16 Jun
mirage13–70.0923%16 Jun
dust29–130.0335%11 Jun
dust212–160.0418%10 Jun
dust210–130.0023%9 Jun
inferno4–130.0624%8 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →