grapes

grapes — CS2 Stats

US76561198141724991[U:1:181459263]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

978Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,742Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongEntry Fragger
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning73
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55396Last 10055%Win rateWWLWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.8
Aggression10.0
Utility2.8
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels6.6
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 68% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 68% on CT to 45% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning7.3
Utility2.8
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels6.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time580ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy32.4%+4.7%
first ⅓ avg 27.7% → last ⅓ avg 32.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — anubis 13–5
130Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA38211755%0.02
ancientD134931%-0.00
cacheA138562%0.04
dust2A117464%-0.03
anubisB105550%-0.01
nukeS86275%-0.00
inferno43175%0.01
overpass2020%-0.00
poseidon110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

72,828Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
3,755Matches
44.6%Match win rate
42.2%Headshot %
14.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
8,608MVPs
1,675Hours (in match)
2,803Bombs planted
933Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP19,754
AK-4719,407
SSG 081,993
MAC-101,729
MP91,604
P901,218

Lifetime map wins

5,798dust2
1,437nuke
1,300inferno
843vertigo
500train
321cbble
100office
86lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

67Matches
52%Win rate
1.39Avg K/D
95.6ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1958%1.2918.9
Dust2633%1.1118.2
Anubis540%1.7220.2
Cache580%1.2421.8
Ancient540%1.4121.8
Nuke425%1.0618.0
Inferno425%1.1421.3
Overpass2100%1.7233.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.4%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
87.7%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
577msReaction time
45.2%T opening success
67.6%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
10.33HE damage / grenade
2.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3768 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0242%14 Aug
mirage13–70.0634%11 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0227%11 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0715%11 Aug
dust28–13-0.0237%8 Aug
dust25–130.0333%7 Aug
cache13–110.0636%1 Aug
cache8–13-0.0140%3 Jul
mirage10–130.0021%1 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0210%28 Jun
mirage13–70.0728%27 Jun
cache16–120.0520%27 Jun
nuke13–60.0243%21 Jun
mirage8–130.0322%21 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0430%20 Jun
dust211–13-0.0534%18 Jun
anubis13–50.1333%18 Jun
mirage13–110.0829%17 Jun
inferno13–50.0226%15 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0325%8 Jun
dust213–0-0.06100%8 Jun
mirage13–90.0430%7 Jun
mirage8–130.0129%6 Jun
mirage13–90.0531%6 Jun
nuke13–30.0238%5 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0243%30 May
ancient4–13-0.0718%30 May
mirage13–16-0.0631%29 May
ancient5–13-0.0432%28 May
dust213–9-0.0433%25 May
anubis9–13-0.0443%24 May
mirage13–90.0131%24 May
mirage7–13-0.0323%23 May
nuke13–11-0.0218%22 May
mirage8–13-0.0330%22 May
poseidon9–40.0838%22 May
inferno3–9-0.0562%22 May
ancient15–150.0425%21 May
mirage13–80.0814%21 May
nuke0–13-0.047%20 May
dust213–11-0.0228%20 May
anubis13–10-0.0417%20 May
mirage13–2-0.0520%20 May
mirage6–20.068%20 May
inferno13–10.0613%19 May
mirage15–150.0125%19 May
dust20–13-0.1323%18 May
dust213–10-0.0110%17 May
mirage13–90.0724%17 May
ancient13–80.0314%16 May
dust213–90.0032%15 May
mirage13–80.0122%15 May
anubis13–6-0.0322%14 May
nuke13–7-0.0341%14 May
nuke13–10-0.0122%14 May
anubis2–12-0.0417%13 May
overpass3–130.0534%13 May
mirage13–9-0.0118%13 May
mirage11–13-0.0121%12 May
ancient3–13-0.0435%11 May
mirage10–130.0421%11 May
ancient13–110.0524%11 May
anubis13–3-0.0327%11 May
ancient7–130.0118%11 May
ancient10–13-0.0236%8 May
cache12–120.0425%7 May
cache13–40.0844%7 May
cache12–120.0722%7 May
inferno13–100.0121%6 May
mirage13–6-0.0231%6 May
cache13–80.0829%5 May
cache13–4-0.0238%5 May
anubis11–13-0.0613%5 May
ancient15–150.0222%5 May
mirage7–130.0619%4 May
cache13–80.0432%2 May
cache9–90.0139%2 May
cache13–100.0532%2 May
cache4–120.0729%2 May
ancient13–9-0.0129%30 Apr
ancient13–1-0.0011%30 Apr
dust213–6-0.0129%30 Apr
cache13–30.0550%30 Apr
mirage8–130.0231%29 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0228%26 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0228%26 Apr
mirage13–110.0526%25 Apr
anubis6–130.0935%25 Apr
mirage13–60.0924%25 Apr
nuke8–130.0926%24 Apr
mirage13–60.0942%23 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0514%22 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0030%22 Apr
mirage2–4-0.0314%20 Apr
mirage13–90.0230%19 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0225%19 Apr
mirage9–130.0231%19 Apr
ancient15–150.0232%18 Apr
dust216–12-0.0527%18 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0419%18 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →