sweet soul ♡ — CS2 Stats

76561198141446379[U:1:181180651]✓ No bans

525Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,919Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating22,355Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#8696 of 31941 tracked

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 2 median	Level 3 median	vs Level 3
Headshot rate	33.5%	42.1%	42.1%	8.6% short
Shot accuracy	19.6%	12.9%	12.1%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.03	1.00	0.99	above
Match win rate	38.2%	42.9%	43.9%	5.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning71

Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–46–8Last 10046%Win rateLWLWTLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.7

Aggression10.0

Utility2.2

Positioning7.1

Opening Duels6.1

Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 93% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning7.1

Utility2.2

Mechanics9.5

Opening Duels6.1

Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time575ms−5ms

first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms

Headshot accuracy15.7%−1.1%

first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — nuke 9–3

13–2Biggest win — inferno

5Longest win streak

13–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 31% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	27	13–14	48%	-0.00
mirage	D	16	5–11	31%	0.01
nuke	B	15	8–7	53%	0.02
dust2	B	15	8–7	53%	0.02
ancient	C	11	4–7	36%	0.02
anubis	S	5	4–1	80%	-0.02
overpass	C	5	2–3	40%	0.02
vertigo	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.08
cache	—	2	2–0	100%	0.02
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

64,710Lifetime kills

1.03K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players

3,214Matches

38.2%Match win rate

33.5%Headshot %

19.6%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 2 players

7,285MVPs

1,176Hours (in match)

3,971Bombs planted

822Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,734

M4A4 / M4A1-S11,027

AWP8,545

P2000 / USP-S3,264

Desert Eagle3,048

Glock-182,456

SSG 081,905

SG 5531,871

P2501,239

MP91,179

Lifetime map wins

5,719dust2

5,442inferno

1,170nuke

490vertigo

424cbble

400train

372lake

186safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

25Matches

40%Win rate

0.88Avg K/D

72.3ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	2	100%	0.82	12.5
Cache	1	0%	0.82	14.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy

41.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.7%Spray accuracy

92.5%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

586msReaction time

51.0%T opening success

58.0%CT opening success

0.35Enemies flashed / flash

1.6%Flash assists

8.05HE damage / grenade

2.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3477 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	4–9	-0.02	10%	18 Aug →
inferno	9–4	-0.08	16%	18 Aug →
inferno	3–9	-0.12	21%	18 Aug →
nuke	9–5	0.09	17%	11 Aug →
inferno	8–8	-0.06	8%	11 Aug →
inferno	2–9	-0.13	15%	11 Aug →
inferno	9–7	0.04	14%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	11%	7 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.03	9%	6 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.05	19%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.11	14%	1 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	-0.01	6%	1 Aug →
inferno	12–16	-0.04	20%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	15%	26 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.01	9%	26 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.01	13%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–4	0.08	14%	26 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	11%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.02	12%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.05	16%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.07	16%	23 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.09	13%	23 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.07	10%	23 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	18%	22 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.03	15%	22 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.02	19%	22 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	21%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	17%	21 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.03	21%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	21%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	23%	18 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.02	17%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.08	35%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.01	26%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.06	13%	18 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.02	12%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	18%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.06	22%	18 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.02	22%	17 Jul →
nuke	16–14	-0.02	16%	17 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.02	18%	16 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.04	20%	16 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	17%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.04	17%	16 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.01	18%	16 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.06	26%	15 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	6%	15 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.08	29%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	21%	14 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.02	9%	3 Jul →
overpass	13–16	0.06	17%	1 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.11	16%	1 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.02	19%	30 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.01	15%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.05	16%	30 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	25%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.00	3%	30 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.07	19%	30 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.03	17%	27 Jun →
inferno	14–16	0.01	15%	26 Jun →
inferno	15–15	0.03	28%	26 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.00	8%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–5	-0.03	6%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.01	3%	24 Jun →
overpass	15–15	0.07	20%	24 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.01	28%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.03	26%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–16	-0.01	12%	23 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	24%	22 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	25%	22 Jun →
mirage	14–16	-0.05	9%	21 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.01	26%	20 Jun →
inferno	9–5	0.11	19%	20 Jun →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	17%	18 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.10	26%	17 Jun →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	14%	15 Jun →
overpass	13–11	-0.04	6%	15 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	16%	15 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	14%	14 Jun →
inferno	8–8	-0.04	7%	14 Jun →
inferno	9–7	0.03	11%	14 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.01	9%	13 Jun →
overpass	8–8	-0.07	17%	12 Jun →
vertigo	5–9	-0.14	13%	12 Jun →
nuke	9–3	0.26	13%	12 Jun →
inferno	9–2	0.14	11%	12 Jun →
vertigo	2–9	-0.07	6%	12 Jun →
dust2	16–14	-0.02	14%	12 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	16%	12 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.03	24%	12 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	19%	12 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	18%	11 Jun →
office	6–13	-0.03	34%	11 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.07	24%	11 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	24%	11 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	14%	11 Jun →
anubis	13–5	-0.04	13%	11 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.05	33%	11 Jun →
inferno	3–2	-0.02	14%	11 Jun →
overpass	13–10	0.06	15%	11 Jun →