Osamas Been Lying — CS2 Stats

76561198136862292[U:1:176596564]

1,105Tracked matches45%Win rate2022Tracked since
835Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating11,859Blue band · top ~45% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6727 of 9434 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOsamas Been LyingPREMIER11,859 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning48
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47494Last 10047%Win rateWLLLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression6.4
Utility3.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.8
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time633ms−110ms
first ⅓ avg 743ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−4.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 3–0
132Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9nukeWeakest map · 36% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2281436%-0.04
mirageC1881044%-0.02
cacheA1811761%-0.01
infernoC135838%-0.02
anubisB105550%-0.03
ancientS96367%-0.02
vertigo42250%0.00
dust23030%-0.03
poseidon1010%0.01
debris110100%0.10
overpass110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,799Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
1,455Matches
43.2%Match win rate
46.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
8.3%Shot accuracy
3,445MVPs
411Hours (in match)
935Bombs planted
267Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,849nuke
1,559dust2
1,489inferno
924vertigo
694train
163lake
130office
76cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
74.1%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
636msReaction time
29.4%T opening success
45.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
8.15HE damage / grenade
5.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.4343% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–2-0.0414%24 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0319%24 Aug
nuke6–12-0.0412%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0518%22 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0615%22 Aug
nuke10–1-0.0229%22 Aug
cache13–160.0329%22 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0620%22 Aug
cache11–40.0632%22 Aug
nuke0–8-0.058%20 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0424%19 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0714%18 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0315%17 Aug
dust29–130.0716%17 Aug
cache13–80.029%16 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0420%16 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0718%16 Aug
nuke5–9-0.1219%16 Aug
cache15–150.0419%15 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0219%15 Aug
vertigo6–90.0417%15 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0332%15 Aug
nuke3–130.0324%15 Aug
ancient4–130.0320%15 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0713%13 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0220%12 Aug
cache13–110.0220%11 Aug
dust22–13-0.0623%11 Aug
cache13–9-0.1011%9 Aug
inferno13–5-0.029%9 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0014%9 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0222%9 Aug
inferno16–140.0221%9 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0714%8 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0515%8 Aug
mirage13–20.0639%8 Aug
inferno13–4-0.019%8 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0325%7 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0215%5 Aug
cache13–90.0117%5 Aug
anubis2–13-0.088%4 Aug
cache13–20.0833%4 Aug
cache13–30.0224%3 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0613%3 Aug
ancient13–100.0520%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0321%2 Aug
cache13–60.0417%2 Aug
mirage2–13-0.1221%2 Aug
anubis13–90.0122%2 Aug
cache7–13-0.0523%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.1235%1 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0712%1 Aug
cache7–130.0027%1 Aug
vertigo9–60.0219%1 Aug
poseidon6–90.0124%1 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0611%30 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0719%30 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0213%28 Jul
nuke13–30.0535%26 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0630%26 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0225%26 Jul
mirage3–00.1327%26 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0613%26 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0319%26 Jul
debris9–50.1019%26 Jul
nuke0–13-0.1324%26 Jul
vertigo8–80.0026%26 Jul
vertigo9–5-0.0534%26 Jul
cache6–13-0.0732%25 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0819%23 Jul
cache13–5-0.0327%22 Jul
cache13–10-0.0519%19 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0217%19 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0729%19 Jul
cache13–11-0.0411%19 Jul
cache11–13-0.0717%19 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0636%19 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0520%18 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0516%18 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0513%18 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0319%17 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0119%16 Jul
ancient13–80.0246%15 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0725%15 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0227%15 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0220%14 Jul
nuke9–60.0441%12 Jul
inferno5–9-0.0328%12 Jul
inferno9–50.0833%12 Jul
cache12–12-0.0919%12 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0621%12 Jul
inferno6–90.0117%12 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0711%15 May
anubis6–130.0515%15 May
overpass8–1-0.0122%15 May
nuke13–40.0026%15 May
inferno9–13-0.0220%14 May
ancient13–100.0124%14 May
mirage13–5-0.0323%14 May
nuke7–13-0.0415%13 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →