Burlington Throatfactory

Burlington Throatfactory — CS2 Stats

US76561198130561087[U:1:170295359]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,247Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,310Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate41.8%42.2%42.7%0.9% short
Shot accuracy11.7%11.9%10.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.010.981.00meets
Match win rate39.5%43.6%44.1%4.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBurlington ThroatfactoryFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning40
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41509Last 10041%Win rateLWTLWLLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0
Aggression4.2
Utility2.4
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.0
Utility2.4
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time558ms−112ms
first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — inferno 13–8
130Biggest win — fachwerk
4Longest win streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 50% over 6mirageWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C27111641%-0.02
nukeC167944%0.00
cacheC125742%0.01
ancientC104640%-0.01
vertigoC83538%-0.01
anubisB63350%-0.01
mirageD6060%-0.04
train43175%0.01
inferno32167%0.03
boulder21150%0.00
office21150%0.03
shelter2020%-0.03
fachwerk110100%-0.04
italy1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

80,700Lifetime kills
1.01K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players
5,008Matches
39.5%Match win rate
41.8%Headshot %
11.7%Shot accuracy
9,743MVPs
2,273Hours (in match)
2,637Bombs planted
705Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,800
AWP8,416
Tec-92,534
SSG 081,556
MP91,372
Negev1,342

Lifetime map wins

5,862dust2
5,586inferno
3,257nuke
1,872vertigo
1,751train
1,351office
486cbble
111aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

36Matches
47%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
88.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

13%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21258%1.2317.2
Mirage633%1.4016.5
Anubis450%1.0017.3
Ancient10%1.2922.0
Nuke10%0.9326.0
Train1100%1.2922.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
560msReaction time
19.3%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
9.69HE damage / grenade
5.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.6532% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3584 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.2666% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0216%29 Aug
ancient13–30.0723%27 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0016%27 Aug
dust24–13-0.0413%27 Aug
ancient13–90.037%25 Aug
nuke7–130.0120%25 Aug
vertigo8–130.0113%24 Aug
cache12–120.025%24 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0411%24 Aug
dust213–4-0.0112%23 Aug
nuke10–130.0210%23 Aug
ancient11–130.0216%21 Aug
dust212–120.0115%21 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0411%20 Aug
nuke13–80.0522%20 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0520%19 Aug
dust213–5-0.0413%18 Aug
boulder13–20.0810%18 Aug
train13–60.0331%17 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0716%17 Aug
dust28–13-0.0411%16 Aug
dust213–40.018%15 Aug
cache13–7-0.0220%15 Aug
dust213–80.028%14 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0113%14 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0123%13 Aug
dust213–3-0.0419%13 Aug
vertigo13–10.014%12 Aug
dust213–4-0.0422%12 Aug
train3–13-0.0217%11 Aug
anubis2–13-0.019%11 Aug
cache13–110.0322%11 Aug
office9–130.0117%8 Aug
cache8–13-0.0116%8 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0312%7 Aug
dust213–9-0.0211%7 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0213%6 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0516%6 Aug
vertigo13–50.0411%6 Aug
cache7–130.0231%6 Aug
inferno13–80.0916%5 Aug
nuke12–120.0032%5 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0130%4 Aug
dust25–110.0136%4 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0810%4 Aug
anubis13–50.0720%3 Aug
nuke13–70.0318%3 Aug
train13–4-0.0119%3 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0511%31 Jul
vertigo7–13-0.0421%31 Jul
inferno13–110.0521%30 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0121%26 Jul
dust20–13-0.1114%26 Jul
cache13–90.0418%24 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0517%21 Jul
dust24–130.0324%21 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0513%20 Jul
dust210–13-0.039%17 Jul
cache2–13-0.0025%17 Jul
shelter8–13-0.0010%16 Jul
anubis13–50.0220%16 Jul
nuke4–130.0015%15 Jul
dust212–120.0122%13 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0328%11 Jul
dust213–2-0.0113%9 Jul
fachwerk13–0-0.044%9 Jul
boulder5–13-0.0715%9 Jul
shelter3–13-0.077%9 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0722%3 Jul
dust25–13-0.0216%3 Jul
dust213–2-0.0321%2 Jul
cache9–13-0.0125%2 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0412%30 Jun
dust25–8-0.056%30 Jun
dust213–4-0.038%29 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0612%28 Jun
cache13–110.058%24 Jun
dust213–10.0317%24 Jun
nuke13–11-0.009%23 Jun
dust24–13-0.0418%22 Jun
vertigo4–13-0.0517%22 Jun
nuke13–110.0317%22 Jun
italy5–13-0.0126%22 Jun
nuke6–20.0619%20 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0722%20 Jun
ancient13–100.016%19 Jun
cache13–70.0017%19 Jun
dust25–13-0.0211%18 Jun
nuke13–60.0619%18 Jun
cache9–13-0.0229%18 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0223%18 Jun
train13–10.0230%18 Jun
dust29–13-0.0818%18 Jun
dust212–120.0314%25 May
inferno8–13-0.0417%25 May
cache8–13-0.0324%23 May
office13–30.0619%23 May
vertigo8–13-0.0516%22 May
dust27–13-0.0723%18 May
vertigo13–80.059%7 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →