Zexicore — CS2 Stats

US76561198125407000[U:1:165141272]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

630Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

736Hours in CS

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating9,490Light Blue band · top ~57.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#37435 of 51451 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	40.9%	42.7%	44.0%	3.2% short
Shot accuracy	19.8%	10.8%	11.6%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.25	1.00	1.03	above
Match win rate	49.6%	44.1%	45.1%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67

Positioning58

Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY37–54–9Last 10037%Win rateWTTWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7

Aggression8.8

Utility7.8

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels4.2

Limited utility dependenceHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 664ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7

Positioning5.8

Utility7.8

Mechanics8.4

Opening Duels4.2

Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time659ms+11ms

first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 659ms

Headshot accuracy19.6%−3.9%

first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — nuke 9–1

13–2Biggest win — nuke

4Longest win streak

6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8vertigoWeakest map · 13% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	C	27	12–15	44%	0.05
mirage	C	19	8–11	42%	0.04
dust2	D	11	3–8	27%	0.03
train	D	9	3–6	33%	0.02
inferno	A	8	5–3	63%	0.11
vertigo	D	8	1–7	13%	0.01
ancient	—	3	1–2	33%	0.00
agency	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.02
jura	—	2	0–2	0%	0.11
anubis	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.00
thera	—	2	1–1	50%	0.10
grail	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01
office	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.00
basalt	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01
edin	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
palais	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08
mills	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

47,222Lifetime kills

1.25K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players

2,636Matches

49.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players

40.9%Headshot %

19.8%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 4 players

5,688MVPs

736Hours (in match)

2,118Bombs planted

363Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,554

AWP6,626

M4A4 / M4A1-S6,316

Desert Eagle3,137

P2000 / USP-S1,889

Glock-181,277

P901,233

Negev1,030

Five-SeveN728

AUG685

Lifetime map wins

3,452nuke

2,669dust2

1,738inferno

1,333vertigo

653train

504office

237cbble

172dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

10Matches

50%Win rate

1.20Avg K/D

—ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	3	67%	1.41	18.0
Vertigo	3	0%	1.00	15.3
Nuke	3	67%	1.37	18.0
Inferno	1	100%	0.65	13.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy

37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.8%Spray accuracy

87.6%Counter-strafing

13.3°Preaim

664msReaction time

44.1%T opening success

49.4%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

10.1%Flash assists

11.41HE damage / grenade

3.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 13.2782° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.5435 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
train	13–11	0.03	21%	4 Jul →
train	15–15	-0.02	21%	2 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.07	16%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	24%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.17	31%	19 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	16%	19 Jun →
agency	2–13	-0.03	13%	19 Jun →
inferno	9–7	0.04	21%	18 Jun →
jura	11–13	0.15	12%	17 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	17%	17 Jun →
train	7–13	0.01	29%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.05	10%	17 Jun →
ancient	2–13	-0.05	17%	17 Jun →
inferno	4–13	0.07	17%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.10	15%	7 Jun →
mirage	16–14	0.04	27%	7 Jun →
nuke	8–1	0.01	26%	7 Jun →
jura	5–13	0.06	16%	7 Jun →
inferno	9–4	0.21	7%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.05	26%	5 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	18%	5 Jun →
grail	8–13	0.01	16%	5 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	13%	5 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.00	19%	4 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.14	17%	4 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.14	12%	4 Jun →
nuke	13–2	0.03	24%	4 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.03	27%	4 Jun →
nuke	12–16	0.02	23%	3 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.11	34%	3 Jun →
train	11–13	0.02	19%	3 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.01	27%	3 Jun →
train	13–8	0.07	17%	2 Jun →
vertigo	13–6	0.06	11%	2 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.02	26%	2 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.03	11%	2 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	25%	2 Jun →
dust2	14–16	0.07	29%	31 May →
mirage	7–13	0.07	21%	31 May →
mirage	13–8	0.15	28%	30 May →
mirage	3–13	0.07	23%	30 May →
mirage	6–13	0.04	15%	29 May →
nuke	13–7	0.09	19%	28 May →
mirage	7–13	0.05	20%	28 May →
nuke	9–1	0.24	20%	27 May →
vertigo	7–9	0.01	30%	27 May →
nuke	4–13	0.01	10%	27 May →
mirage	13–8	0.07	29%	27 May →
dust2	8–2	0.04	25%	27 May →
mirage	7–0	0.15	18%	27 May →
anubis	6–13	0.04	14%	27 May →
nuke	13–8	0.15	27%	20 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	12%	20 May →
nuke	10–13	0.03	22%	20 May →
agency	7–13	-0.01	22%	17 May →
office	13–10	-0.00	24%	16 May →
nuke	7–13	0.08	18%	16 May →
nuke	8–8	0.03	31%	16 May →
dust2	9–13	0.07	28%	24 Mar →
train	8–13	0.03	23%	24 Mar →
nuke	12–12	0.00	12%	24 Mar →
nuke	7–13	0.02	17%	20 Feb →
train	13–8	0.02	37%	20 Feb →
mirage	8–13	0.02	9%	9 Feb →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	11%	9 Feb →
dust2	13–6	0.08	16%	7 Feb →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	19%	7 Feb →
train	11–13	-0.03	19%	7 Feb →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	19%	3 Feb →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	14%	3 Feb →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	18%	10 Jan →
vertigo	5–13	-0.00	19%	10 Jan →
basalt	10–13	0.01	18%	7 Jan →
edin	13–7	0.06	16%	7 Jan →
train	11–13	0.02	33%	7 Jan →
palais	4–9	-0.08	17%	14 Nov →
vertigo	9–13	-0.02	58%	13 Nov →
mills	8–6	-0.01	57%	13 Nov →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	14%	13 Nov →
nuke	4–13	0.05	19%	13 Nov →
dust2	13–7	0.07	12%	12 Nov →
nuke	13–6	0.07	12%	11 Nov →
inferno	12–12	0.19	35%	10 Nov →
dust2	10–13	0.13	22%	10 Nov →
mirage	13–5	0.04	23%	10 Nov →
vertigo	7–9	0.02	21%	8 Nov →
nuke	8–8	0.12	36%	8 Nov →
inferno	9–3	0.20	16%	8 Nov →
dust2	6–13	0.06	28%	8 Nov →
italy	8–13	0.02	26%	6 Nov →
thera	13–6	0.13	24%	6 Nov →
mirage	12–12	0.02	21%	6 Nov →
vertigo	1–13	-0.01	25%	6 Nov →
vertigo	4–13	0.01	21%	6 Nov →
inferno	13–11	0.09	22%	5 Nov →
nuke	12–12	-0.02	23%	5 Nov →
mirage	9–13	0.07	24%	5 Nov →
nuke	13–10	0.05	25%	4 Nov →
vertigo	7–13	-0.00	20%	4 Nov →
thera	10–13	0.06	23%	4 Nov →