SkollieSkelm — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198122675431[U:1:162409703]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

773Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since

1,380Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.7 Developing

Premier CS Rating13,120Blue band · top ~38.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#8903 of 12898 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54

Positioning49

Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–53–2Last 10045%Win rateLLWWTWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4

Aggression4.1

Utility3.9

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels0.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 648ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4

Positioning4.9

Utility3.9

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels0.8

Win Impact7.4

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time643ms−20ms

first ⅓ avg 663ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms

Headshot accuracy16.4%+4.4%

first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–7

13–1Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	27	12–15	44%	0.00
mirage	B	24	11–13	46%	-0.00
inferno	D	13	4–9	31%	-0.01
ancient	A	11	7–4	64%	-0.02
nuke	A	10	6–4	60%	0.00
cache	C	8	3–5	38%	0.00
anubis	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

31,591Lifetime kills

0.94K/D

1,884Matches

35.7%Match win rate

37.0%Headshot %

11.8%Shot accuracy

3,085MVPs

716Hours (in match)

1,388Bombs planted

435Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-479,737

AWP5,193

M4A4 / M4A1-S5,059

P2000 / USP-S1,763

Desert Eagle1,627

Glock-181,049

SSG 08729

MAC-10618

MP9553

P250451

Lifetime map wins

4,554dust2

1,661inferno

1,154nuke

1,105vertigo

143cbble

101train

74office

28lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy

32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.7%Spray accuracy

79.1%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

648msReaction time

29.3%T opening success

36.3%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

8.2%Flash assists

5.35HE damage / grenade

4.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.496 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.3242% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	4–13	0.10	33%	25 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.08	17%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	21%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	18%	15 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.05	17%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	15%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	13%	15 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.04	13%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.06	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.10	17%	13 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.10	13%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.08	24%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	26%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.05	12%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	12%	8 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	14%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.05	23%	5 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.07	4%	2 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	14%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.00	13%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	12%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	-0.06	10%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.01	15%	25 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	12%	25 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.03	13%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.08	22%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.04	20%	24 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.11	17%	23 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.04	22%	23 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	8%	23 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.05	13%	23 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.00	23%	23 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.05	17%	22 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.03	18%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.03	23%	20 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.05	13%	19 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.09	15%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.08	25%	19 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	15%	19 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	6%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.04	10%	17 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.02	4%	17 Jul →
nuke	2–0	-0.06	0%	17 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	11%	17 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.04	14%	17 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.01	11%	17 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	17%	17 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	11%	14 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.07	7%	13 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	19%	13 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	15%	12 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	17%	12 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	10%	12 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	11%	11 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.04	14%	11 Jul →
mirage	12–1	-0.06	9%	11 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	19%	11 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	15%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.00	17%	11 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.01	9%	11 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.08	3%	11 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	26%	11 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.01	12%	11 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.07	12%	11 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.02	11%	11 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.04	11%	11 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	11%	11 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.09	10%	10 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	9%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.06	12%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	7%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.01	17%	10 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	10%	10 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.06	8%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.05	20%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.03	6%	10 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	18%	10 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.02	11%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.02	10%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	12%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.10	7%	8 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	7%	8 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.04	8%	7 Jul →
nuke	1–13	-0.02	9%	7 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.04	14%	6 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.05	14%	6 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	15%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	17%	5 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.02	12%	5 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	8%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.12	23%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	12%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	8%	5 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	14%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.00	12%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.13	19%	4 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.03	10%	4 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	11%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.03	17%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	9%	4 Jul →