NonGMOSalt — CS2 Stats
76561198118564284[U:1:158298556]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 2 median | vs Level 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 32.3% | 42.1% | 9.8% short |
| Shot accuracy | 11.6% | 12.9% | 1.3% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.05 | 1.00 | above |
| Match win rate | 46.2% | 42.9% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 2 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 2 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating
Player DNA
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | B | 89 | 43–46 | 48% | 0.00 |
 nuke | D | 5 | 1–4 | 20% | -0.03 |
 cache | — | 3 | 0–3 | 0% | -0.05 |
 ancient | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.06 |
 dust2 | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.01 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Best CS2 CrosshairAim Training →
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.9113% — below the 15% mark we flag
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4666 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.973% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.03 | 8% | 18 Aug → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | 0.02 | 15% | 18 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.03 | 17% | 18 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.01 | 38% | 18 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | -0.01 | 15% | 16 Aug → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | -0.06 | 14% | 14 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | -0.03 | 16% | 13 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | -0.05 | 15% | 13 Aug → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | -0.03 | 11% | 5 Aug → | |
| mirage | 0–13 | -0.10 | 0% | 5 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.06 | 9% | 3 Aug → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.02 | 17% | 31 Jul → | |
| mirage | 10–0 | 0.04 | 38% | 31 Jul → | |
| mirage | 1–6 | -0.05 | 19% | 31 Jul → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | 0.01 | 12% | 24 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | -0.00 | 28% | 24 Jul → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | 0.09 | 13% | 14 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.00 | 17% | 10 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.01 | 20% | 7 Jul → | |
| mirage | 8–10 | -0.05 | 12% | 7 Jul → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | -0.01 | 15% | 7 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.03 | 18% | 7 Jul → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | 0.05 | 20% | 6 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.11 | 12% | 6 Jul → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.02 | 11% | 26 Jun → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.05 | 24% | 26 Jun → | |
| cache | 9–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 20 May → | |
| cache | 12–12 | -0.11 | 0% | 20 May → | |
| cache | 9–13 | -0.04 | 3% | 5 May → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | -0.09 | 0% | 16 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | -0.01 | 28% | 16 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 8–13 | -0.01 | 7% | 14 Apr → | |
| ancient | 13–10 | -0.04 | 19% | 14 Apr → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | 0.15 | 20% | 11 Apr → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | -0.04 | 12% | 9 Apr → | |
| mirage | 4–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 4 Apr → | |
| mirage | 6–10 | -0.05 | 18% | 31 Mar → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.02 | 17% | 13 Mar → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | 0.00 | 9% | 11 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | -0.01 | 15% | 11 Mar → | |
| mirage | 1–5 | -0.02 | 45% | 11 Mar → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | -0.12 | 20% | 7 Mar → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.02 | 13% | 5 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | -0.02 | 7% | 5 Mar → | |
| mirage | 2–13 | -0.06 | 18% | 5 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | -0.03 | 11% | 1 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.06 | 13% | 1 Mar → | |
| mirage | 4–7 | 0.02 | 26% | 1 Mar → | |
| mirage | 0–5 | -0.03 | 0% | 28 Feb → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 25 Feb → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.05 | 20% | 22 Feb → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.03 | 17% | 20 Feb → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | -0.06 | 8% | 20 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | -0.03 | 10% | 18 Feb → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.05 | 10% | 18 Feb → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.02 | 20% | 15 Feb → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | -0.07 | 9% | 13 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | -0.02 | 17% | 11 Feb → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.01 | 50% | 11 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–0 | 0.04 | 25% | 11 Feb → | |
| mirage | 4–13 | 0.04 | 30% | 1 Feb → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | -0.00 | 23% | 30 Jan → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.00 | 6% | 30 Jan → | |
| mirage | 2–0 | 0.07 | 0% | 30 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.02 | 21% | 30 Jan → | |
| mirage | 5–0 | 0.20 | 25% | 30 Jan → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.03 | 13% | 29 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.04 | 22% | 28 Jan → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.03 | 12% | 26 Jan → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | 0.04 | 16% | 23 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.06 | 22% | 13 Jan → | |
| mirage | 2–13 | -0.10 | 11% | 13 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | -0.01 | 15% | 12 Jan → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | 0.01 | 11% | 10 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | -0.00 | 5% | 9 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | -0.05 | 8% | 8 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.04 | 10% | 8 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.03 | 10% | 8 Jan → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.03 | 12% | 8 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.05 | 18% | 7 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | -0.01 | 17% | 4 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.06 | 15% | 31 Dec → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.01 | 14% | 31 Dec → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | -0.02 | 26% | 31 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.08 | 22% | 30 Dec → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | -0.04 | 13% | 27 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | -0.02 | 13% | 27 Dec → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | 0.02 | 0% | 24 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.03 | 12% | 23 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.00 | 17% | 22 Dec → | |
| mirage | 4–13 | -0.00 | 13% | 21 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.00 | 17% | 18 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.04 | 26% | 17 Dec → | |
| mirage | 0–13 | -0.10 | 22% | 10 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.06 | 17% | 2 Dec → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | -0.03 | 13% | 30 Nov → | |
| mirage | 3–7 | 0.00 | 6% | 30 Nov → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.09 | 17% | 26 Nov → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | -0.07 | 26% | 25 Nov → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.03 | 17% | 23 Nov → |
Match data via Leetify.