atlantikos

atlantikos — CS2 Stats

US76561198112961753[U:1:152696025]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

757Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,843Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate46.3%42.1%42.1%above
Shot accuracy19.7%12.9%12.1%above
Kill/death ratio1.461.000.99above
Match win rate38.9%42.9%43.9%5.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGatlantikosFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning44
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY503812Last 10050%Win rateLLLTLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression5.1
Utility4.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.7

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 93% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.4
Utility4.1
Mechanics9.5
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time623ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — inferno 13–0
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
73In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 58% over 26infernoWeakest map · 47% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA26151158%0.04
dust2B23111248%0.01
infernoB178947%0.02
nukeB158753%0.03
mirageA95456%0.01
anubis42250%0.06
ancient2020%-0.03
train2020%0.04
overpass110100%-0.00
office1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

83,419Lifetime kills
1.46K/D · Top 10% of Level 2 players
3,293Matches
38.9%Match win rate
46.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
19.7%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 2 players
7,516MVPs
1,100Hours (in match)
2,998Bombs planted
837Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,370
AWP6,129
UMP-452,507
P2502,017
MP91,336
FAMAS1,319

Lifetime map wins

7,816dust2
2,990inferno
2,193nuke
1,009vertigo
1,008train
182italy
174office
135dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
92.6%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
629msReaction time
34.4%T opening success
39.5%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
9.60HE damage / grenade
3.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.0751 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.4399% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–130.0015%23 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0811%23 Aug
mirage8–130.049%4 Jul
dust212–12-0.0313%27 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0519%26 Jun
cache13–30.1119%24 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0013%23 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0128%23 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0312%21 Jun
dust213–70.0118%20 Jun
dust212–12-0.0325%19 Jun
train4–130.0115%19 Jun
inferno16–140.0116%19 Jun
dust24–130.0120%19 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0124%18 Jun
dust213–110.0424%17 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0224%17 Jun
nuke13–70.0113%14 Jun
dust213–20.0516%14 Jun
nuke13–60.0627%13 Jun
dust213–7-0.0410%13 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0821%13 Jun
train5–130.0715%12 Jun
dust24–13-0.0417%12 Jun
inferno12–120.0121%8 Jun
cache4–130.0415%8 Jun
nuke10–130.0424%8 Jun
mirage13–00.0411%7 Jun
cache13–50.0719%7 Jun
inferno5–110.0213%6 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0425%6 Jun
nuke13–110.0828%5 Jun
dust27–130.0721%5 Jun
anubis13–10.0923%5 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0221%4 Jun
mirage13–100.019%4 Jun
nuke11–130.0229%4 Jun
dust213–20.0922%3 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0024%31 May
cache8–130.0615%31 May
inferno5–13-0.0611%31 May
dust212–120.0715%29 May
ancient6–13-0.0219%29 May
nuke13–110.0614%29 May
inferno13–90.0514%27 May
cache13–90.0214%26 May
nuke12–120.029%23 May
mirage13–80.0414%22 May
cache13–30.059%22 May
office10–13-0.0316%22 May
dust23–13-0.0523%22 May
inferno13–00.2324%21 May
cache13–70.1617%21 May
inferno13–40.0812%20 May
dust28–13-0.0314%20 May
cache13–60.0122%20 May
cache12–12-0.008%18 May
cache13–80.0720%17 May
cache3–130.0318%13 May
mirage6–130.017%13 May
cache13–80.0814%12 May
inferno13–10.0441%12 May
cache13–70.0216%11 May
cache13–70.0728%8 May
cache3–130.0324%8 May
inferno13–50.0912%6 May
dust213–50.029%6 May
inferno8–130.0310%5 May
cache13–10.057%5 May
cache12–12-0.0119%5 May
cache8–4-0.036%5 May
cache8–130.0219%4 May
cache13–60.0523%4 May
cache7–130.0117%3 May
cache13–50.057%3 May
cache7–13-0.0111%3 May
cache13–5-0.0312%2 May
cache7–130.0012%29 Apr
cache7–130.0427%29 Apr
nuke12–120.0310%28 Apr
dust210–130.0119%28 Apr
nuke13–60.0120%26 Apr
dust213–11-0.0713%26 Apr
mirage13–110.0534%26 Apr
anubis12–120.0216%25 Apr
dust213–50.1623%25 Apr
dust212–120.0324%23 Apr
anubis13–50.1926%19 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0117%19 Apr
dust212–120.0410%19 Apr
mirage11–130.0220%13 Apr
dust213–90.0410%12 Apr
nuke2–50.025%12 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0517%11 Apr
dust213–10-0.0017%19 Mar
nuke13–90.0026%26 Feb
nuke13–80.0420%1 Feb
dust213–7-0.0319%1 Feb
nuke13–90.1126%1 Feb
nuke13–16-0.0311%17 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →