g r a m  s

g r a m s — CS2 Stats

CA76561198106663829[U:1:146398101]Steam profile ↗

1,076Tracked matches66%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,485Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating12,934Blue band · top ~39.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#34926 of 52667 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=673), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate48.9%41.2%42.2%above
Shot accuracy14.3%12.5%11.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.220.960.98above
Match win rate45.5%42.8%43.6%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 3 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGg r a m sFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER12,934 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning39
Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61354Last 10061%Win rateLWWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression5.3
Utility2.1
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 49 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning3.9
Utility2.1
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time515ms−137ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — debris 9–6
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 100% over 6anubisWeakest map · 50% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA26151158%0.03
dust2B24131154%0.01
cacheA1912763%0.03
anubisB126650%0.02
infernoS660100%0.04
nukeB63350%0.02
ancientS54180%0.05
debris220100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

87,035Lifetime kills
1.22K/D · Top 25% of Level 2 players
3,981Matches
45.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players
48.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 2 players
14.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 2 players
8,556MVPs
1,485Hours (in match)
1,830Bombs planted
840Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,218
AWP8,065
P902,824
Negev1,890
MP91,479
FAMAS1,469

Lifetime map wins

24,825dust2
1,370inferno
1,112nuke
188train
176office
104italy
103dust
101aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

72Matches
46%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
64.7ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1443%0.749.9
Dust21242%0.7911.8
Cache1050%0.8012.0
Anubis520%0.8415.8
Inferno367%0.6411.0
Ancient10%0.203.0
Nuke1100%0.6312.0
Vertigo1100%0.9211.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
517msReaction time
30.2%T opening success
37.5%CT opening success
0.25Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
13.03HE damage / grenade
1.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.248 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2142% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–13-0.0214%21 Aug
cache13–70.1420%21 Aug
mirage13–30.1115%21 Aug
inferno9–40.0618%21 Aug
debris9–60.1526%20 Aug
anubis13–60.0018%20 Aug
dust25–13-0.0429%20 Aug
cache11–13-0.0615%20 Aug
mirage5–130.1125%19 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0022%18 Aug
mirage13–90.098%17 Aug
cache13–100.0925%17 Aug
mirage13–80.0217%17 Aug
inferno13–20.0818%17 Aug
cache13–70.1019%17 Aug
dust23–13-0.0833%16 Aug
anubis6–130.1012%16 Aug
mirage4–13-0.1133%16 Aug
nuke7–9-0.0021%15 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0211%15 Aug
mirage5–130.0517%15 Aug
cache13–70.1413%15 Aug
nuke9–30.0731%15 Aug
cache13–80.049%14 Aug
mirage13–90.0714%14 Aug
cache13–60.0924%14 Aug
nuke9–30.0440%14 Aug
dust213–90.1417%12 Aug
mirage11–130.1325%12 Aug
dust20–12-0.0633%12 Aug
dust213–20.1027%11 Aug
cache15–15-0.0622%11 Aug
dust213–50.0124%11 Aug
mirage13–00.097%11 Aug
dust213–50.0518%11 Aug
nuke13–90.0724%11 Aug
dust27–130.0121%9 Aug
dust211–13-0.0818%7 Aug
anubis13–1-0.0226%7 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0223%7 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0114%7 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0117%7 Aug
mirage3–130.0222%7 Aug
mirage13–40.1417%7 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0519%6 Aug
dust25–13-0.0116%6 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0218%6 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0013%5 Aug
dust213–40.017%5 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0611%5 Aug
dust213–11-0.0419%5 Aug
anubis12–160.0417%5 Aug
cache13–00.1245%4 Aug
dust213–100.0118%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0118%3 Aug
ancient13–90.0019%3 Aug
mirage8–130.0111%3 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0614%3 Aug
cache13–110.0017%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0320%2 Aug
cache13–110.0316%2 Aug
mirage13–20.0114%2 Aug
inferno13–40.1122%1 Aug
ancient13–20.0923%1 Aug
cache9–13-0.0020%1 Aug
mirage13–20.0117%1 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0115%1 Aug
dust213–30.1220%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0026%1 Aug
ancient13–80.0314%1 Aug
dust215–150.0023%1 Aug
cache13–100.0326%1 Aug
dust213–3-0.1017%1 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0713%1 Aug
anubis13–40.1124%1 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0111%1 Aug
debris9–4-0.0710%1 Aug
cache9–13-0.0229%1 Aug
anubis13–80.0525%1 Aug
mirage13–60.0419%1 Aug
cache9–13-0.0526%1 Aug
inferno13–4-0.019%31 Jul
cache11–13-0.0118%31 Jul
dust213–80.0520%31 Jul
anubis13–30.0721%31 Jul
cache0–7-0.0321%31 Jul
dust216–130.0813%31 Jul
mirage13–90.0715%31 Jul
dust215–150.0313%30 Jul
ancient13–70.1028%30 Jul
dust213–40.0522%30 Jul
dust28–130.0518%29 Jul
cache13–100.0015%29 Jul
dust211–13-0.0019%29 Jul
ancient11–130.0214%28 Jul
mirage13–10.0223%28 Jul
mirage13–100.0024%28 Jul
cache13–90.0823%28 Jul
anubis9–130.0618%28 Jul
mirage13–90.0418%28 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →