ted

ted — CS2 Stats

US76561198103212573[U:1:142946845]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

909Tracked matches59%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,211Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.4 Learning
Premier CS Rating6,610Light Blue band · top ~71.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10518 of 13957 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtedFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER6,610 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning38
Utility13

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52426Last 10052%Win rateTWLLLWLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.8
Aggression3.4
Utility1.3
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning3.8
Utility1.3
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact8.1

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time560ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%+5.7%
first ⅓ avg 11.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — office 4–0
132Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 100% over 6dust2Weakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeA39231659%-0.01
dust2D113827%-0.03
cacheB115645%-0.04
trainC83538%0.00
infernoS660100%0.03
mirageC52340%-0.03
shelter42250%-0.02
ancient41325%-0.01
anubis31233%-0.03
vertigo330100%-0.01
nuke31233%-0.01
italy110100%0.07
overpass1010%-0.06
warden110100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

28,496Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
2,016Matches
44.4%Match win rate
39.3%Headshot %
8.2%Shot accuracy
5,298MVPs
682Hours (in match)
1,811Bombs planted
842Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,771dust2
3,076office
2,023nuke
1,365inferno
500vertigo
390train
138italy
46cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

14Matches
36%Win rate
0.61Avg K/D
65.7ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
67%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient333%0.6514.7
Dust2333%0.589.3
Nuke10%0.8916.0
Thera1100%0.5012.0
Anubis10%0.428.0
Train10%0.5511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
28.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.8%Spray accuracy
65.7%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
542msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
29.5%CT opening success
0.08Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
11.37HE damage / grenade
0.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.0794 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.8173% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office12–120.039%25 Aug
office13–5-0.0120%25 Aug
office8–13-0.0850%12 Aug
office8–130.0828%30 Jul
office11–130.0323%29 Jul
office13–10-0.0018%29 Jul
office5–13-0.0215%27 Jul
office13–6-0.026%27 Jul
office13–100.0010%26 Jul
office12–120.0616%26 Jul
office4–13-0.060%26 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0316%25 Jul
office4–00.090%25 Jul
shelter8–13-0.0813%17 Jul
shelter13–30.0728%16 Jul
office10–13-0.0611%16 Jul
office8–13-0.046%12 Jul
train3–13-0.0715%12 Jul
train9–13-0.0517%12 Jul
office13–8-0.0121%11 Jul
vertigo13–70.0015%11 Jul
office13–8-0.0331%11 Jul
shelter13–10-0.0622%9 Jul
shelter12–12-0.0230%9 Jul
office13–5-0.0115%8 Jul
office13–3-0.0611%8 Jul
italy13–30.0717%8 Jul
office13–5-0.048%8 Jul
inferno13–70.0922%4 Jul
nuke13–50.0416%4 Jul
dust213–8-0.0433%4 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0516%4 Jul
cache13–9-0.0518%2 Jul
nuke10–13-0.057%30 Jun
office10–13-0.0321%27 Jun
office13–4-0.0212%27 Jun
overpass3–13-0.065%23 Jun
mirage13–5-0.080%23 Jun
dust22–13-0.0514%23 Jun
cache13–10-0.0716%21 Jun
office6–130.047%21 Jun
office13–10-0.043%20 Jun
office13–3-0.023%20 Jun
office13–50.0519%20 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0511%20 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0411%20 Jun
office13–70.0016%20 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0310%20 Jun
cache13–8-0.0713%19 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0515%19 Jun
inferno13–20.008%19 Jun
train13–30.0411%19 Jun
office13–90.0312%19 Jun
office13–5-0.0014%19 Jun
office13–100.0315%18 Jun
train13–110.0810%17 Jun
dust27–13-0.0429%17 Jun
train13–90.0320%17 Jun
mirage9–10.0819%14 Jun
dust210–13-0.0410%14 Jun
dust210–13-0.100%14 Jun
dust27–13-0.0611%14 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0322%14 Jun
dust26–10.0413%13 Jun
office5–130.0010%13 Jun
warden13–3-0.0513%13 Jun
office7–13-0.0416%9 Jun
office13–80.0110%9 Jun
dust24–13-0.0425%8 Jun
office7–13-0.030%8 Jun
office13–5-0.0220%4 Jun
cache4–13-0.0319%17 May
inferno13–60.0521%17 May
cache13–70.017%17 May
anubis13–5-0.027%16 May
cache12–120.0113%16 May
cache10–13-0.0212%5 May
inferno11–60.023%5 May
ancient7–130.0417%4 May
cache7–13-0.090%4 May
office10–13-0.019%30 Apr
office13–50.059%30 Apr
office13–9-0.045%30 Apr
cache13–7-0.0417%30 Apr
cache11–13-0.045%29 Apr
cache6–13-0.0310%29 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0613%20 Apr
vertigo13–7-0.068%20 Apr
inferno13–50.0714%20 Apr
office13–100.0115%17 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0412%17 Apr
train12–120.0415%16 Apr
ancient13–40.0214%16 Apr
train12–12-0.0613%15 Apr
vertigo13–30.0118%15 Apr
dust213–6-0.0212%15 Apr
dust22–4-0.010%7 Apr
dust211–130.089%1 Apr
office10–13-0.0812%26 Feb
train6–13-0.0124%25 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →