Floquinho — CS2 Stats

BR76561198100934944[U:1:140669216]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,017Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,710Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,241Top 25% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#9154 of 59008 tracked

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,911), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	45.9%	48.4%	51.7%	5.8% short
Shot accuracy	14.0%	13.2%	13.8%	meets
Kill/death ratio	1.09	1.08	1.09	meets
Match win rate	48.3%	47.0%	48.7%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning57

Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateWLLLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2

Aggression8.2

Utility3.8

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels4.4

Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning5.7

Utility3.8

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels4.4

Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time579ms−12ms

first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms

Headshot accuracy19.2%−1.3%

first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — anubis 13–2

13–2Biggest win — anubis

5Longest win streak

9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 18nukeWeakest map · 10% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	29	18–11	62%	0.02
inferno	S	18	12–6	67%	0.02
mirage	D	15	4–11	27%	-0.01
anubis	D	13	3–10	23%	0.00
nuke	D	10	1–9	10%	-0.01
ancient	A	10	6–4	60%	0.01
overpass	—	4	3–1	75%	0.03
cache	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (10% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

130,387Lifetime kills

1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players

5,079Matches

48.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players

45.9%Headshot %

14.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players

14,773MVPs

2,491Hours (in match)

5,125Bombs planted

1,295Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4746,901

M4A4 / M4A1-S21,742

AWP19,469

Desert Eagle7,035

P2000 / USP-S5,394

Glock-185,083

P902,530

FAMAS2,509

MAC-102,346

Galil AR2,229

Lifetime map wins

14,367inferno

12,567dust2

6,554vertigo

2,578nuke

1,403train

397cbble

89lake

32assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

70Matches

57%Win rate

1.19Avg K/D

88.9ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win

31%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	20	55%	1.20	17.8
Mirage	12	92%	1.13	18.3
Inferno	11	36%	1.01	17.6
Anubis	6	67%	1.12	19.5
Nuke	4	75%	1.97	25.0
Ancient	3	67%	0.97	16.0
Cache	1	0%	0.84	27.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy

35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.6%Spray accuracy

79.1%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

593msReaction time

34.5%T opening success

60.6%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

2.2%Flash assists

9.88HE damage / grenade

2.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4743 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.4976% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

10% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–5	-0.01	22%	31 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	19%	25 Aug →
anubis	17–19	-0.04	15%	16 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.05	19%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.19	0%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.00	17%	7 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	14%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	31%	2 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	22%	31 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.01	22%	30 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.03	19%	30 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	28%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.09	14%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.04	26%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.14	13%	29 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	20%	28 Jul →
inferno	16–13	-0.00	28%	28 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.00	16%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.05	30%	27 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	12%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	18%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.08	15%	25 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	22%	25 Jul →
anubis	12–16	-0.00	11%	25 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	17%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.05	16%	24 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.00	31%	24 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	18%	22 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.07	16%	21 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.06	16%	21 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.04	17%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.02	30%	20 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.06	19%	19 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	21%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	13%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.00	19%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	16%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.11	17%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.05	39%	19 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.03	25%	18 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	16%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.05	34%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.14	23%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	26%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.00	22%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.00	10%	16 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	17%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	21%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.13	24%	13 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.04	14%	12 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	15%	12 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	19%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.03	17%	12 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	19%	12 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.01	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	20–22	0.02	22%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.14	55%	12 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	21%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	20%	10 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.01	7%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	27%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.04	37%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.04	17%	5 Jul →
overpass	13–8	0.06	27%	5 Jul →
mirage	17–19	0.07	27%	5 Jul →
overpass	6–13	-0.04	24%	30 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	14%	25 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	22%	25 Jun →
overpass	4–2	0.02	15%	24 Jun →
anubis	6–13	0.05	20%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.01	17%	23 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.05	34%	23 Jun →
inferno	15–15	0.03	29%	19 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.00	34%	18 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	3%	16 Jun →
overpass	13–2	0.08	16%	16 Jun →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	13%	16 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	17%	15 Jun →
anubis	9–13	0.06	17%	14 Jun →
ancient	8–13	0.03	20%	14 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	12%	14 Jun →
inferno	16–14	-0.03	18%	13 Jun →
dust2	6–13	0.03	22%	12 Jun →
anubis	14–16	0.03	11%	11 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.08	25%	11 Jun →
inferno	13–2	0.01	17%	11 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.04	29%	10 Jun →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	16%	10 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	11%	9 Jun →
mirage	15–15	-0.05	16%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.01	30%	7 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.12	25%	7 Jun →
nuke	1–13	-0.07	30%	7 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	18%	7 Jun →
nuke	4–13	-0.07	23%	7 Jun →
inferno	13–11	-0.00	24%	7 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.03	30%	7 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.08	25%	4 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	18%	4 Jun →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	20%	4 Jun →