swilLy — CS2 Stats

76561198099813183[U:1:139547455]

4,741Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,975Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning57
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49438Last 10049%Win rateLLWLWWWTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression6.3
Utility5.3
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.7
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact3.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time596ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–4
131Biggest win — vertigo
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A27161159%0.02
cacheD1861233%0.00
mirageA169756%0.02
nukeD102820%-0.02
ancientD93633%0.00
infernoA85363%0.03
vertigoS75271%0.04
anubisA53260%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

174,445Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
7,098Matches
44.8%Match win rate
47.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
11.8%Shot accuracy
14,874MVPs
3,975Hours (in match)
5,214Bombs planted
1,773Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4754,468
AWP21,747
P2504,448
Tec-94,207
MP93,468

Lifetime map wins

15,849dust2
14,813inferno
4,999nuke
3,790vertigo
2,638train
437cbble
119office
30italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,411Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
75.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12248%1.0014.7
Inferno11756%1.1516.4
Ancient10947%0.9815.2
Dust29949%0.9714.3
Anubis5044%1.0015.2
Overpass2365%1.0014.4
Nuke1953%0.9914.3
Cache1662%0.8915.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.3%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
583msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
53.5%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
9.39HE damage / grenade
12.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4995 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.6821% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–130.1122%28 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0118%28 Aug
dust213–50.0012%28 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0320%28 Aug
cache13–60.0522%27 Aug
inferno13–90.0319%27 Aug
mirage13–60.1126%27 Aug
cache12–12-0.0012%27 Aug
cache10–130.0114%26 Aug
anubis1–130.0036%26 Aug
cache1–13-0.0128%26 Aug
dust210–130.039%25 Aug
vertigo13–70.0921%25 Aug
dust211–130.0322%25 Aug
dust212–120.0722%25 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0538%25 Aug
dust213–6-0.0128%24 Aug
cache8–13-0.0617%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.0824%22 Aug
dust213–100.0227%21 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0619%20 Aug
ancient0–5-0.070%19 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0120%19 Aug
vertigo13–20.0230%19 Aug
ancient13–70.0115%19 Aug
dust211–10.0469%19 Aug
dust213–4-0.0017%19 Aug
dust28–130.0415%18 Aug
mirage8–130.0334%18 Aug
ancient12–120.0512%17 Aug
cache5–7-0.0329%17 Aug
vertigo5–13-0.0447%13 Aug
vertigo13–10.0015%13 Aug
nuke3–9-0.0327%10 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0520%10 Aug
dust28–13-0.0320%10 Aug
mirage6–3-0.0415%10 Aug
dust210–130.0327%9 Aug
cache13–110.0324%9 Aug
inferno8–130.0334%9 Aug
dust213–60.0624%7 Aug
vertigo13–70.1122%7 Aug
ancient2–130.0122%7 Aug
anubis1–13-0.056%7 Aug
dust213–7-0.0410%6 Aug
nuke12–120.0619%6 Aug
mirage6–130.0322%6 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0513%6 Aug
vertigo11–130.0112%6 Aug
vertigo13–30.119%6 Aug
dust213–80.0917%6 Aug
dust213–20.0411%5 Aug
dust212–12-0.0220%5 Aug
cache12–12-0.0113%5 Aug
cache13–50.006%5 Aug
nuke12–20.0225%5 Aug
dust29–13-0.0331%5 Aug
anubis13–70.0932%5 Aug
ancient4–130.0226%5 Aug
dust213–1-0.0120%5 Aug
anubis13–110.0424%4 Aug
mirage13–40.1419%4 Aug
dust28–13-0.0510%4 Aug
cache13–70.0420%3 Aug
nuke12–120.0121%2 Aug
inferno13–70.0314%2 Aug
dust213–60.0817%2 Aug
mirage13–90.0110%2 Aug
cache13–90.0231%2 Aug
anubis13–60.0626%2 Aug
inferno13–20.0223%2 Aug
inferno13–70.0033%2 Aug
nuke9–13-0.069%2 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0329%2 Aug
mirage9–130.0419%1 Aug
mirage13–50.0722%1 Aug
cache9–130.0129%1 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0110%30 Jul
dust213–8-0.0015%30 Jul
ancient13–50.0623%29 Jul
inferno9–20.0744%29 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0632%29 Jul
cache13–5-0.0112%28 Jul
cache6–13-0.0718%20 Jul
mirage13–40.1030%16 Jul
cache8–130.0024%16 Jul
inferno11–130.0412%9 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0123%9 Jul
dust213–70.0825%9 Jul
cache11–130.0225%9 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0029%9 Jul
dust213–70.0223%9 Jul
cache6–13-0.0212%7 Jul
mirage10–2-0.0038%7 Jul
cache11–130.1130%4 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0223%3 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0117%3 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0118%2 Jul
dust213–7-0.0429%2 Jul
dust213–4-0.0022%2 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →