Celica — CS2 Stats

76561198098755779[U:1:138490051]✓ No bans

831Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,993Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCelicaFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning57
Utility15

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55423Last 10055%Win rateLTLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.8
Aggression10.0
Utility1.5
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.7
Utility1.5
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time608ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — overpass 13–1
131Biggest win — overpass
7Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1911858%0.01
dust2C1761135%0.00
ancientS139469%0.00
overpassS139469%0.01
infernoD123925%0.00
anubisS118373%0.03
nukeA95456%0.02
cacheA53260%0.02
vertigo110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

70,713Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
2,932Matches
45.8%Match win rate
44.0%Headshot %
17.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
7,084MVPs
1,511Hours (in match)
3,834Bombs planted
622Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

11,009dust2
4,868inferno
1,574nuke
739vertigo
707cbble
543train
78office
64aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

129Matches
47%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1136%1.3616.9
Inferno757%1.4321.0
Anubis580%1.5517.2
Vertigo475%1.5024.3
Overpass475%1.8213.5
Ancient1100%2.4036.0
Nuke10%0.9222.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
596msReaction time
54.1%T opening success
44.4%CT opening success
0.24Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
5.84HE damage / grenade
2.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.245 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–130.0324%25 Aug
cache15–15-0.0713%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0020%20 Aug
dust213–90.0224%20 Aug
cache13–40.0110%20 Aug
cache7–130.0129%14 Aug
mirage13–50.1317%14 Aug
dust213–110.0415%14 Aug
cache13–80.0529%12 Jul
cache13–70.0816%10 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0121%19 Jun
inferno9–130.0229%9 Apr
dust210–130.0025%2 Mar
mirage6–130.0021%2 Mar
anubis13–110.0626%2 Mar
anubis13–50.0623%2 Mar
ancient1–8-0.0756%1 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0126%1 Mar
dust211–13-0.0622%1 Mar
mirage13–90.0915%1 Mar
mirage10–130.0129%1 Mar
ancient13–4-0.0326%28 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0427%28 Feb
overpass5–13-0.0613%27 Feb
dust28–13-0.0546%27 Feb
dust28–130.0319%27 Feb
inferno13–100.0029%27 Feb
overpass13–40.0219%27 Feb
dust213–11-0.0420%27 Feb
overpass13–70.0318%27 Feb
dust24–13-0.0933%27 Feb
dust213–80.0315%27 Feb
ancient16–14-0.0216%27 Feb
nuke13–40.0226%26 Feb
dust27–13-0.0135%26 Feb
nuke13–90.0216%26 Feb
mirage13–7-0.068%26 Feb
dust214–160.0121%26 Feb
dust213–30.0334%26 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0132%26 Feb
anubis13–40.0925%25 Feb
ancient13–70.0033%25 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0424%25 Feb
mirage13–20.0828%25 Feb
overpass13–70.0216%25 Feb
overpass9–130.029%25 Feb
mirage13–70.0326%24 Feb
ancient13–5-0.0021%24 Feb
anubis13–100.0120%24 Feb
mirage13–70.0620%24 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0613%24 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0132%24 Feb
mirage13–80.0010%24 Feb
ancient13–110.0015%24 Feb
overpass13–70.0425%24 Feb
overpass13–10.1530%24 Feb
overpass2–130.0019%23 Feb
ancient9–130.0518%23 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0714%23 Feb
anubis13–100.0115%22 Feb
inferno15–150.0425%22 Feb
ancient13–20.1239%22 Feb
nuke13–70.0528%22 Feb
dust215–15-0.0316%22 Feb
inferno5–130.0517%22 Feb
anubis13–40.0521%22 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0330%22 Feb
nuke13–30.0518%22 Feb
dust29–130.0517%22 Feb
overpass5–13-0.0532%22 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0221%20 Feb
ancient13–3-0.019%19 Feb
anubis7–130.0323%19 Feb
overpass13–3-0.0515%19 Feb
inferno13–20.0423%19 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0424%18 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0112%17 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0119%17 Feb
overpass13–70.0418%17 Feb
anubis13–80.0117%16 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0218%16 Feb
nuke9–130.0633%16 Feb
inferno4–130.0327%16 Feb
vertigo13–40.0514%16 Feb
mirage3–13-0.1020%16 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0618%16 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0116%16 Feb
anubis13–60.0614%16 Feb
ancient1–13-0.0613%16 Feb
inferno14–16-0.0228%16 Feb
nuke8–130.0526%16 Feb
inferno11–130.0114%16 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0217%15 Feb
mirage13–80.0321%15 Feb
overpass13–9-0.0123%15 Feb
dust216–130.0621%15 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0216%15 Feb
ancient13–50.1329%15 Feb
mirage16–140.0120%15 Feb
dust211–130.0118%15 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →