Palm Beach Pete — CS2 Stats

US76561198093699518[U:1:133433790]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,220Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,264Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidHybrid Rifler

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim76

Positioning56

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateWWWTTWLLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.6

Aggression5.2

Utility5.9

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels1.2

Clutch5.2

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6

Positioning5.6

Utility5.9

Mechanics8.5

Opening Duels1.5

Win Impact6.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time589ms−19ms

first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms

Headshot accuracy22.0%+5.6%

first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — ancient 13–9

13–1Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

W3Current streak

12–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 18anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	36	21–15	58%	-0.03
ancient	S	18	12–6	67%	-0.03
mirage	A	16	9–7	56%	-0.06
inferno	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.04
anubis	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.04
nuke	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.07
cache	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
office	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.01
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

71,285Lifetime kills

1.22K/D · Top 25% of tracked players

3,273Matches

42.4%Match win rate

49.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players

11.8%Shot accuracy

5,370MVPs

1,264Hours (in match)

2,944Bombs planted

706Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,707

M4A4 / M4A1-S9,574

AWP4,824

P2000 / USP-S3,209

SSG 083,049

Negev2,564

Desert Eagle2,269

Glock-182,013

P2501,652

MP91,622

Lifetime map wins

11,687dust2

3,586nuke

2,869inferno

1,846office

750vertigo

292train

225cbble

149lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

64Matches

59%Win rate

0.70Avg K/D

63.7ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win

7%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	17	65%	0.68	10.6
Ancient	15	73%	0.84	13.2
Mirage	13	54%	0.62	10.1
Inferno	8	38%	0.67	11.6
Anubis	4	50%	0.73	12.0
Overpass	3	33%	0.50	9.7
Nuke	3	67%	0.58	8.7
Train	1	100%	0.82	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy

29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.5%Spray accuracy

88.1%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

585msReaction time

27.9%T opening success

41.9%CT opening success

0.62Enemies flashed / flash

2.6%Flash assists

11.26HE damage / grenade

8.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.9427% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–7	0.06	18%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.03	33%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.10	15%	31 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.01	15%	31 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.06	17%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	46%	29 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	17%	29 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	33%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	16%	26 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.03	28%	26 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.01	15%	25 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	26%	25 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	20%	26 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	15%	26 Jun →
dust2	1–13	-0.13	25%	20 Jun →
cache	13–8	-0.00	28%	20 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	37%	7 Jun →
inferno	13–7	-0.00	27%	31 May →
ancient	13–8	-0.07	19%	17 May →
ancient	6–13	-0.10	21%	24 Apr →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	24%	23 Apr →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	21%	12 Apr →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	17%	12 Apr →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	13%	5 Apr →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	23%	5 Apr →
ancient	13–10	0.05	12%	5 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	12%	5 Apr →
office	13–10	-0.04	18%	3 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	41%	3 Apr →
office	6–13	-0.04	23%	3 Apr →
dust2	3–1	-0.02	0%	3 Apr →
dust2	4–13	0.03	36%	3 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.11	15%	3 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	13%	3 Apr →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	20%	3 Apr →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	21%	3 Apr →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	37%	2 Apr →
mirage	13–11	-0.08	22%	2 Apr →
anubis	5–13	0.01	21%	29 Mar →
ancient	13–5	-0.00	12%	28 Mar →
office	13–11	0.05	22%	27 Mar →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	19%	27 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.02	21%	27 Mar →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	15%	27 Mar →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	18%	27 Mar →
ancient	19–17	-0.03	26%	27 Mar →
nuke	7–13	-0.12	13%	27 Mar →
ancient	2–13	-0.09	11%	27 Mar →
ancient	13–9	0.08	21%	27 Mar →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	18%	26 Mar →
inferno	13–4	0.05	29%	26 Mar →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	16%	25 Mar →
dust2	13–1	0.01	16%	25 Mar →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	15%	24 Mar →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	16%	23 Mar →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	18%	23 Mar →
mirage	6–13	-0.09	17%	22 Mar →
overpass	7–13	-0.09	24%	22 Mar →
dust2	22–20	-0.01	12%	22 Mar →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	17%	22 Mar →
mirage	16–14	-0.07	11%	22 Mar →
dust2	13–4	-0.07	23%	22 Mar →
inferno	16–13	-0.01	21%	21 Mar →
dust2	13–5	-0.06	22%	21 Mar →
dust2	13–7	-0.08	21%	21 Mar →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	18%	20 Mar →
anubis	13–2	-0.08	13%	20 Mar →
inferno	7–13	-0.09	11%	20 Mar →
mirage	13–6	-0.06	14%	20 Mar →
dust2	8–13	-0.10	14%	20 Mar →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	12%	20 Mar →
dust2	13–16	-0.02	25%	20 Mar →
ancient	13–4	-0.02	17%	20 Mar →
dust2	16–14	-0.07	16%	20 Mar →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	26%	18 Mar →
dust2	13–4	0.01	19%	18 Mar →
inferno	13–9	-0.07	13%	18 Mar →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	15%	16 Mar →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	17%	16 Mar →
nuke	8–13	-0.12	12%	16 Mar →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	23%	15 Mar →
overpass	9–6	0.05	11%	15 Mar →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	12%	15 Mar →
dust2	9–13	-0.10	10%	15 Mar →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	16%	15 Mar →
dust2	13–7	0.03	25%	15 Mar →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	13%	15 Mar →
ancient	0–6	-0.06	18%	15 Mar →
mirage	4–13	-0.08	5%	15 Mar →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	23%	15 Mar →
dust2	13–10	-0.09	15%	15 Mar →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	29%	15 Mar →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	21%	15 Mar →
inferno	4–13	-0.09	8%	15 Mar →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	23%	15 Mar →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	21%	15 Mar →
anubis	6–13	-0.08	21%	15 Mar →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	17%	14 Mar →
inferno	6–1	-0.08	0%	14 Mar →
ancient	13–5	-0.04	18%	14 Mar →