lil gup — CS2 Stats

LI76561198059420574[U:1:99154846]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

808Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.5 Solid

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim58

Positioning59

Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–42–3Last 10055%Win rateWTWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8

Aggression7.4

Utility4.6

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels3.4

Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8

Positioning5.9

Utility4.6

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels3.4

Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time623ms+45ms

first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms

Headshot accuracy21.7%+3.4%

first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — anubis 13–2

13–1Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

12–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 16anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	33	19–14	58%	0.03
mirage	B	17	9–8	53%	-0.00
ancient	S	16	11–5	69%	0.01
inferno	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.00
nuke	C	7	3–4	43%	0.03
office	B	6	3–3	50%	0.07
anubis	D	6	2–4	33%	0.07
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	0.01
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

60Matches

57%Win rate

1.41Avg K/D

90.3ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

29%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	19	63%	1.59	19.7
Ancient	14	64%	1.32	17.6
Mirage	11	55%	1.39	16.6
Inferno	7	43%	1.20	16.3
Nuke	3	67%	1.27	17.0
Anubis	3	33%	2.04	17.0
Overpass	1	0%	0.53	10.0
Train	1	100%	0.83	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy

30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.4%Spray accuracy

76.1%Counter-strafing

11.0°Preaim

629msReaction time

30.5%T opening success

57.0%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

4.5%Flash assists

9.69HE damage / grenade

5.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4491 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.4882% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–10	0.03	17%	26 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.00	19%	26 Jul →
mirage	16–12	-0.01	18%	25 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.08	24%	25 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	22%	26 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	18%	26 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	17%	7 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.03	16%	31 May →
ancient	6–13	-0.09	12%	24 Apr →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	20%	23 Apr →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	20%	12 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.01	15%	12 Apr →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	17%	5 Apr →
ancient	13–10	0.01	23%	5 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	34%	5 Apr →
office	13–10	0.08	21%	3 Apr →
dust2	11–13	0.09	21%	3 Apr →
office	6–13	0.03	29%	3 Apr →
dust2	3–1	0.09	31%	3 Apr →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	25%	3 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	14%	3 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	37%	3 Apr →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	16%	3 Apr →
dust2	13–10	0.05	26%	3 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.00	30%	2 Apr →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	22%	2 Apr →
inferno	13–10	-0.06	23%	2 Apr →
anubis	13–2	0.23	39%	2 Apr →
overpass	13–7	0.02	27%	31 Mar →
dust2	13–2	0.06	26%	31 Mar →
anubis	5–13	0.01	21%	29 Mar →
ancient	13–5	0.09	6%	28 Mar →
office	13–11	0.14	17%	27 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.01	8%	27 Mar →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	16%	27 Mar →
ancient	19–17	-0.03	24%	27 Mar →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	11%	27 Mar →
ancient	2–13	-0.04	14%	27 Mar →
ancient	13–9	0.03	19%	27 Mar →
dust2	9–13	0.05	11%	26 Mar →
inferno	13–4	0.03	30%	26 Mar →
nuke	13–8	0.06	13%	26 Mar →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	13%	26 Mar →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	7%	25 Mar →
anubis	5–13	0.06	17%	25 Mar →
mirage	13–11	0.01	27%	25 Mar →
dust2	13–1	0.14	25%	25 Mar →
dust2	13–7	0.06	24%	24 Mar →
dust2	16–13	0.04	21%	24 Mar →
inferno	5–13	0.02	7%	24 Mar →
overpass	13–9	0.04	24%	23 Mar →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	16%	23 Mar →
dust2	16–13	0.03	18%	23 Mar →
office	10–13	0.12	10%	23 Mar →
office	4–12	0.00	18%	23 Mar →
nuke	13–6	0.14	16%	23 Mar →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	19%	23 Mar →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	15%	22 Mar →
overpass	7–13	-0.05	15%	22 Mar →
dust2	22–20	0.05	26%	22 Mar →
anubis	11–13	0.03	16%	22 Mar →
mirage	16–14	-0.03	14%	22 Mar →
dust2	13–4	0.10	15%	22 Mar →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	17%	21 Mar →
inferno	16–13	0.00	15%	21 Mar →
dust2	13–5	0.15	21%	21 Mar →
dust2	13–7	0.07	9%	21 Mar →
ancient	13–5	0.08	12%	20 Mar →
anubis	13–2	0.13	17%	20 Mar →
dust2	13–8	0.06	13%	20 Mar →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	10%	20 Mar →
mirage	13–6	0.03	12%	20 Mar →
dust2	8–13	0.06	14%	20 Mar →
mirage	13–4	0.13	25%	20 Mar →
dust2	13–16	0.02	11%	20 Mar →
ancient	13–4	0.01	6%	20 Mar →
dust2	16–14	0.06	14%	20 Mar →
dust2	12–12	-0.02	19%	18 Mar →
nuke	3–13	0.01	25%	18 Mar →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	18%	18 Mar →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	21%	18 Mar →
office	13–2	0.08	23%	18 Mar →
inferno	13–6	0.01	27%	18 Mar →
ancient	13–10	0.05	12%	18 Mar →
dust2	13–4	0.05	24%	18 Mar →
inferno	13–9	0.05	19%	18 Mar →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	21%	17 Mar →
dust2	16–14	0.03	21%	17 Mar →
mirage	7–13	0.01	15%	17 Mar →
ancient	13–10	0.05	13%	16 Mar →
mirage	13–6	0.15	20%	16 Mar →
ancient	11–13	0.06	16%	16 Mar →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	31%	16 Mar →
nuke	13–11	0.03	24%	16 Mar →
ancient	13–10	0.05	16%	16 Mar →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	16%	16 Mar →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	22%	16 Mar →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	19%	15 Mar →
mirage	4–13	0.01	25%	15 Mar →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	24%	15 Mar →