Mugen Wooe — CS2 Stats

76561198084968105[U:1:124702377]

1,902Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since

1,379Hours in CS

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating11,286Blue band · top ~48.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#21872 of 30810 tracked

FaceitLevel 4 · 1,034 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	42.3%	42.5%	44.2%	1.9% short
Shot accuracy	4.6%	10.9%	11.2%	6.6% short
Kill/death ratio	1.12	0.99	1.04	above
Match win rate	47.1%	44.2%	45.3%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67

Positioning65

Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–54–2Last 10044%Win rateLLLLWTLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7

Aggression9.2

Utility3.9

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels3.9

Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7

Positioning6.5

Utility3.9

Mechanics4.7

Opening Duels3.9

Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time540ms−103ms

first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms

Headshot accuracy15.2%−1.2%

first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — cache 13–5

13–0Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

L4Current streak

8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 33% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	29	14–15	48%	0.03
cache	B	18	9–9	50%	0.04
anubis	D	15	5–10	33%	0.02
ancient	B	12	6–6	50%	0.02
mirage	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.00
inferno	S	9	6–3	67%	0.03
nuke	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.02
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,039Lifetime kills

1.12K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players

3,245Matches

47.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players

42.3%Headshot %

4.6%Shot accuracy

9,159MVPs

1,379Hours (in match)

3,226Bombs planted

729Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,292

M4A4 / M4A1-S8,870

AWP6,840

P2000 / USP-S3,357

Glock-182,818

Galil AR2,467

MP71,920

Negev1,411

Desert Eagle1,356

MP91,129

Lifetime map wins

11,268dust2

4,036nuke

2,322inferno

1,285vertigo

501train

41office

29safehouse

19bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

127Matches

50%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

82.8ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	34	56%	1.12	16.1
Dust2	33	45%	1.11	17.9
Anubis	19	42%	1.12	15.9
Ancient	13	46%	1.12	18.9
Cache	13	62%	1.12	16.2
Inferno	5	60%	1.36	13.8
Vertigo	5	60%	0.85	16.6
Nuke	4	50%	1.21	18.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy

33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

30.4%Spray accuracy

71.3%Counter-strafing

7.5°Preaim

523msReaction time

32.8%T opening success

58.7%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

7.8%Flash assists

5.77HE damage / grenade

3.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.7206 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.8337% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–16	0.11	18%	27 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.07	13%	27 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.07	9%	26 Aug →
nuke	7–9	-0.05	15%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.09	15%	26 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.05	11%	25 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	15%	25 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.04	20%	25 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.13	12%	25 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.11	12%	25 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	11%	24 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.00	15%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.06	13%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	15%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.04	22%	24 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	17%	24 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.13	15%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.07	9%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.03	21%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.10	18%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	21%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.01	22%	24 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.09	14%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.07	21%	23 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.04	26%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.07	8%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.04	15%	23 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	7%	23 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.02	15%	22 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	28%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.07	8%	21 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	7%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.10	14%	19 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.07	15%	19 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	18%	19 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.00	7%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.02	13%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.09	14%	18 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.10	50%	17 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.01	19%	17 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.05	15%	17 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.06	13%	16 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	14%	15 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.01	21%	15 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.06	11%	15 Aug →
ancient	19–17	-0.00	8%	15 Aug →
inferno	9–6	0.06	15%	15 Aug →
anubis	22–20	0.05	11%	13 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.01	6%	10 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.04	7%	10 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.02	13%	10 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.00	24%	9 Aug →
dust2	16–12	0.05	11%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.08	10%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	14%	8 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.05	15%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.09	24%	8 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	10%	8 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.08	20%	7 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.12	25%	7 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.02	11%	6 Aug →
inferno	9–4	-0.05	27%	5 Aug →
inferno	9–5	0.01	19%	5 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	11%	4 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.05	22%	3 Aug →
debris	7–9	0.03	21%	3 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.03	13%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.06	15%	3 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.00	21%	3 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.07	13%	3 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.07	18%	3 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	15%	3 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	11%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.09	33%	3 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	8%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.02	21%	3 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	19%	3 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.04	21%	2 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.03	7%	2 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.06	12%	2 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.04	9%	2 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.05	13%	2 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.02	9%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	13%	2 Aug →
inferno	6–9	0.03	17%	2 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.05	14%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.01	24%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.06	18%	1 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	22%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.05	19%	1 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.02	12%	1 Aug →
cache	12–16	0.06	20%	1 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	21%	31 Jul →
inferno	9–1	0.13	26%	31 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.09	14%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	14%	31 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.01	16%	30 Jul →
anubis	12–16	0.10	16%	30 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	15%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.08	12%	29 Jul →