benthefeet5546 — CS2 Stats

76561198084283985[U:1:124018257]

603Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
525Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.8 Learning
FaceitLevel 3 · 979 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbenthefeet5546FACEITLevel 3 · 979 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim41
Positioning42
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52417Last 10052%Win rateLWLWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.1
Aggression3.9
Utility5.4
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 651ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.1
Positioning4.2
Utility5.4
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time662ms+59ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 11.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–3
132Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 86% over 7anubisWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA38241463%-0.01
dust2D1651131%-0.02
nukeS96367%-0.02
anubisD91811%-0.02
overpassS76186%-0.03
ancientS75271%0.02
cacheS64267%-0.02
infernoD51420%-0.01
warden1010%-0.08
stronghold1010%-0.03
office1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

10,540Lifetime kills
0.72K/D
801Matches
42.2%Match win rate
41.5%Headshot %
0.2%Shot accuracy
1,087MVPs
285Hours (in match)
1,055Bombs planted
155Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,383nuke
1,206dust2
738inferno
164vertigo
63office
63train
13italy
6lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

57Matches
40%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
59.2ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

23%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1250%0.7412.5
Dust21233%0.679.5
Mirage1060%0.6510.7
Nuke922%0.7312.1
Ancient617%0.8013.7
Inferno633%0.8912.8
Overpass2100%0.7111.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
68.0%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
651msReaction time
19.1%T opening success
38.6%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
7.96HE damage / grenade
15.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.499 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.1455% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–13-0.0134%28 Aug
mirage9–4-0.066%28 Aug
mirage10–13-0.029%20 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0415%20 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0520%13 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0115%30 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0218%30 Jul
dust213–50.0110%30 Jun
dust212–160.0216%29 Jun
dust27–13-0.0816%19 Jun
anubis14–160.0112%19 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0814%17 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0225%15 Jun
anubis11–13-0.047%15 Jun
dust210–13-0.0618%12 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0517%7 Jun
inferno10–130.0423%7 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0611%2 Jun
nuke12–12-0.088%30 May
dust211–13-0.0412%30 May
overpass13–30.0318%30 May
mirage2–13-0.138%29 May
mirage13–80.014%29 May
dust26–13-0.0717%29 May
mirage13–110.0114%25 May
mirage13–100.0418%25 May
mirage13–110.0116%25 May
nuke13–40.0515%25 May
dust213–30.1317%24 May
mirage13–6-0.0419%24 May
mirage13–50.0315%24 May
cache13–6-0.0516%24 May
dust29–13-0.0316%24 May
ancient13–30.1117%24 May
dust213–3-0.028%24 May
mirage13–20.0716%22 May
inferno13–70.038%22 May
mirage13–60.0822%22 May
mirage3–13-0.077%15 May
mirage4–13-0.1113%15 May
dust26–13-0.0422%15 May
mirage2–60.0312%15 May
ancient15–15-0.0120%13 May
cache13–60.0012%13 May
mirage11–13-0.0317%13 May
anubis13–11-0.0617%9 May
nuke6–13-0.0815%7 May
dust29–13-0.0219%7 May
mirage13–7-0.039%7 May
dust28–13-0.0112%7 May
anubis12–12-0.0512%7 May
cache12–12-0.0415%4 May
mirage16–13-0.078%4 May
dust213–11-0.068%3 May
ancient13–11-0.0116%2 May
mirage6–13-0.075%2 May
ancient10–13-0.0011%2 May
mirage16–14-0.0113%1 May
overpass13–4-0.038%1 May
nuke13–20.0916%30 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0213%30 Apr
cache13–10-0.0625%29 Apr
cache13–60.0015%29 Apr
mirage13–90.0318%27 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0113%27 Apr
mirage13–50.038%27 Apr
anubis3–130.0410%26 Apr
inferno6–13-0.038%26 Apr
nuke9–10.0423%26 Apr
overpass11–13-0.036%25 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0315%25 Apr
mirage13–40.0110%24 Apr
mirage13–50.038%23 Apr
mirage6–130.0014%23 Apr
warden0–3-0.080%23 Apr
stronghold2–13-0.0317%23 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0615%23 Apr
dust27–13-0.058%23 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0112%21 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0326%21 Apr
office4–13-0.055%17 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0110%17 Apr
mirage8–130.0315%17 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0226%17 Apr
overpass13–10-0.044%17 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0813%17 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0514%17 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0218%16 Apr
mirage13–80.019%10 Apr
mirage13–6-0.018%9 Apr
dust29–13-0.0010%9 Apr
ancient4–10.070%9 Apr
mirage13–60.018%7 Apr
anubis11–130.026%7 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0412%7 Apr
dust213–70.0021%5 Apr
overpass13–5-0.034%5 Apr
anubis12–12-0.054%4 Apr
anubis7–13-0.019%4 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0411%4 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →