Nigel Thornberry

Nigel Thornberry — CS2 Stats

US76561198081856212[U:1:121590484]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

808Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,459Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 Developing
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNigel ThornberryFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning44
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56422Last 10056%Win rateLLLWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6
Aggression6.0
Utility4.8
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 670ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time681ms+36ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 681ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — ancient 13–1
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
115In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 90% over 10mirageWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A29171259%0.01
infernoB1910953%0.00
ancientB168850%0.01
overpassS109190%0.02
cacheS86275%-0.01
mirageD71614%-0.02
nukeA53260%0.02
anubis42250%-0.04
train2020%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

34,896Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
2,037Matches
44.4%Match win rate
34.5%Headshot %
16.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
4,782MVPs
867Hours (in match)
1,416Bombs planted
410Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP8,501
AK-475,834
AUG2,524
P2501,646
SG 5531,286
SSG 081,134

Lifetime map wins

6,822dust2
1,847inferno
1,087train
745nuke
580vertigo
69cbble
16office
9lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.4%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
670msReaction time
29.4%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
8.73HE damage / grenade
3.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.5054 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.4027% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–13-0.109%23 Aug
inferno11–130.0611%22 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0425%18 Aug
dust213–100.0616%15 Aug
dust23–13-0.0810%15 Aug
cache13–11-0.018%8 Aug
dust216–13-0.0320%8 Aug
cache13–11-0.0423%8 Aug
ancient13–10.1920%13 Jul
ancient10–130.0116%13 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0310%10 Jul
cache13–8-0.0216%10 Jul
inferno4–13-0.109%3 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0512%30 May
dust215–150.0224%30 May
cache4–130.0113%23 May
mirage9–13-0.028%19 May
ancient10–13-0.0221%19 May
overpass6–40.0525%17 May
mirage13–160.0413%17 May
dust29–13-0.073%17 May
overpass13–11-0.0122%9 May
dust213–70.0513%9 May
ancient14–160.0213%9 May
cache13–8-0.0214%3 May
dust213–40.0119%3 May
dust213–7-0.0622%3 May
ancient13–60.0616%3 May
cache13–9-0.0219%30 Apr
cache13–9-0.0024%30 Apr
cache8–130.0114%30 Apr
overpass13–50.048%15 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0433%15 Apr
dust211–130.0420%14 Apr
dust213–11-0.0019%13 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0119%11 Apr
overpass13–4-0.009%11 Apr
inferno9–130.0418%11 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0111%9 Apr
anubis13–5-0.0018%8 Apr
inferno13–60.0111%8 Apr
overpass13–40.0316%8 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0429%8 Apr
inferno13–100.0428%6 Apr
anubis15–15-0.0414%6 Apr
ancient16–140.0223%5 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0320%5 Apr
dust213–20.0110%5 Apr
dust213–70.0817%5 Apr
dust27–13-0.0113%5 Apr
ancient13–100.038%5 Apr
ancient13–160.0119%5 Apr
dust216–12-0.0511%4 Apr
nuke13–50.0622%4 Apr
nuke10–130.0111%4 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0715%4 Apr
inferno13–90.0111%4 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0617%4 Apr
inferno11–130.0518%4 Apr
ancient13–160.0111%4 Apr
dust26–13-0.047%1 Apr
inferno13–70.099%31 Mar
dust28–130.0524%31 Mar
ancient7–13-0.059%31 Mar
ancient4–13-0.043%31 Mar
inferno8–130.0218%31 Mar
dust216–14-0.0113%28 Mar
overpass13–60.0616%28 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0510%27 Mar
dust28–130.1017%17 Mar
dust213–00.0320%8 Mar
inferno13–5-0.0314%8 Mar
dust28–13-0.0413%8 Mar
overpass13–30.1528%7 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0115%31 Jan
nuke7–130.0222%25 Nov
mirage7–13-0.0211%25 Nov
inferno11–130.0419%15 Nov
dust213–60.0911%18 Oct
dust213–2-0.060%18 Oct
inferno13–6-0.026%18 Oct
overpass13–50.0618%17 Oct
overpass7–13-0.1013%12 Oct
nuke13–70.0316%30 Sept
dust28–13-0.0022%30 Sept
dust213–7-0.048%29 Sept
inferno13–70.0625%29 Sept
train7–13-0.0812%29 Sept
train8–13-0.0310%27 Sept
overpass16–14-0.0512%27 Sept
ancient13–60.0113%27 Sept
dust213–50.0215%27 Sept
dust213–80.0719%20 Sept
dust29–13-0.0215%20 Sept
ancient13–110.0223%20 Sept
dust213–16-0.0115%19 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0223%18 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0121%18 Sept
dust213–40.0916%18 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0310%17 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →