Jarts

Jarts — CS2 Stats

US76561198077973767[U:1:117708039]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,187Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,767Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,881Purple band · top ~9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5519 of 11742 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate49.4%48.1%above
Shot accuracy13.2%12.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.091.08meets
Match win rate45.6%46.5%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Pink band player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJartsPREMIER19,881 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning50
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51436Last 10051%Win rateLLWLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5
Aggression4.7
Utility4.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch2.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.0
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time596ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy23.5%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — inferno 9–7
132Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
119In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 62% over 21dust2Weakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2113862%0.03
infernoC167944%0.03
anubisA148657%0.02
cacheA127558%0.02
dust2D113827%-0.01
mirageC73443%-0.02
ancientB63350%-0.01
debris42250%0.05
poseidon42250%-0.00
overpass2020%-0.03
vertigo110100%0.07
boulder110100%-0.02
train110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

140,455Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
7,036Matches
45.6%Match win rate
49.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
13.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
20,425MVPs
3,244Hours (in match)
7,465Bombs planted
1,818Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4756,269
AWP6,440
MP93,744
P903,354
FAMAS2,851

Lifetime map wins

12,759dust2
9,642inferno
6,102nuke
5,224vertigo
1,928train
1,463office
568cbble
209lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

716Matches
49%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
75.4ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7837%0.8713.6
Nuke5744%1.0114.7
Ancient5549%1.0816.4
Anubis5454%1.0816.8
Inferno5044%1.0115.3
Dust24547%0.9716.0
Overpass2948%0.9815.6
Vertigo2650%1.3217.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.5%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
602msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
54.6%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
8.76HE damage / grenade
6.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.445 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6782% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–130.0215%26 Aug
nuke1–9-0.1544%24 Aug
inferno9–50.1032%24 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0432%22 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0113%21 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0227%21 Aug
mirage13–80.0521%21 Aug
debris6–9-0.0431%21 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0717%19 Aug
anubis13–90.0419%19 Aug
poseidon9–70.0246%17 Aug
vertigo9–40.0720%17 Aug
nuke3–9-0.1221%17 Aug
nuke16–130.0715%12 Aug
cache13–80.0016%12 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0120%12 Aug
dust27–13-0.0637%12 Aug
anubis13–70.0326%12 Aug
nuke9–60.0229%11 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0829%11 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0025%11 Aug
mirage16–140.0216%10 Aug
mirage13–110.0420%10 Aug
nuke8–80.0224%10 Aug
mirage4–13-0.129%24 Jul
nuke7–9-0.0515%23 Jul
dust213–4-0.0429%23 Jul
anubis13–40.0225%23 Jul
dust26–130.0317%23 Jul
dust213–90.0322%22 Jul
anubis11–130.0513%22 Jul
debris9–50.1625%19 Jul
cache13–80.0325%19 Jul
dust214–160.0226%17 Jul
debris7–90.0234%17 Jul
cache13–7-0.0520%17 Jul
debris9–60.0819%17 Jul
poseidon5–9-0.0625%17 Jul
boulder13–10-0.0217%16 Jul
inferno9–70.0640%16 Jul
anubis8–130.0427%14 Jul
nuke13–40.0824%13 Jul
cache11–130.0117%8 Jul
cache12–12-0.0126%7 Jul
nuke3–9-0.0326%3 Jul
anubis13–90.1419%2 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0415%2 Jul
cache5–130.1136%1 Jul
nuke5–130.0921%1 Jul
ancient11–130.0821%29 Jun
nuke9–5-0.0032%28 Jun
cache13–60.0425%27 Jun
nuke9–20.1226%27 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0230%25 Jun
nuke13–110.0644%24 Jun
nuke9–40.1035%23 Jun
nuke9–70.0318%23 Jun
nuke6–9-0.0432%22 Jun
nuke13–20.0837%16 Jun
inferno8–80.1035%16 Jun
inferno9–70.2640%10 Jun
dust26–130.0022%3 Jun
inferno7–130.0625%16 May
inferno3–9-0.0444%15 May
cache13–80.0927%12 May
cache12–120.0724%11 May
mirage4–13-0.049%8 May
dust27–13-0.0320%6 May
ancient16–13-0.0420%5 May
dust215–15-0.0214%3 May
overpass9–13-0.0722%3 May
anubis9–130.0623%2 May
cache13–10-0.0427%1 May
inferno3–130.0133%29 Apr
cache13–16-0.0533%29 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0322%29 Apr
cache13–60.0814%29 Apr
poseidon9–40.0336%28 Apr
nuke13–90.0829%26 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0618%22 Apr
nuke9–70.0913%21 Apr
poseidon5–90.0030%21 Apr
nuke16–140.0633%20 Apr
inferno9–50.1425%20 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0230%18 Apr
anubis13–100.0118%18 Apr
dust213–70.0324%17 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0214%17 Apr
dust211–13-0.0320%15 Apr
ancient9–13-0.069%14 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0515%14 Apr
overpass9–130.0231%13 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0223%11 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0125%11 Apr
anubis13–60.0526%10 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0318%10 Apr
nuke13–30.0727%9 Apr
dust211–13-0.0018%9 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0214%8 Apr
train13–20.0225%7 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →