Big Chungus2010 — CS2 Stats

76561198076251498[U:1:115985770]

395Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
360Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 Developing
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBig Chungus2010FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning44
Utility7

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48457Last 10048%Win rateTLWWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.8
Aggression5.2
Utility0.7
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 715ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning4.4
Utility0.7
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact8.8

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time719ms+69ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 719ms
Headshot accuracy25.7%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 24.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — nuke 13–3
130Biggest win — train
8Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 88% over 8infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB157847%-0.03
nukeB136746%-0.01
anubisD103730%-0.05
vertigoD93633%-0.01
infernoD82625%-0.05
overpassS87188%-0.03
ancientD82625%-0.07
dust2B84450%-0.07
cache31233%-0.04
train330100%-0.02
office32167%-0.02
agency220100%-0.04
mills21150%-0.03
thera21150%-0.06
fachwerk110100%-0.04
boulder110100%-0.06
shelter1010%-0.05
grail110100%0.02
edin1010%-0.02
basalt110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,195Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
1,075Matches
37.8%Match win rate
47.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
14.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
1,418MVPs
360Hours (in match)
553Bombs planted
155Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

905nuke
778dust2
710inferno
698vertigo
365train
112office
34ar_shoots
26safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
28.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
12.2°Preaim
715msReaction time
25.0%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.09Enemies flashed / flash
2.4%Flash assists
11.41HE damage / grenade
0.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.2257° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 715.2487ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.0892 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke12–12-0.0430%20 Jul
cache0–5-0.050%17 Jul
nuke13–70.0625%17 Jul
train13–10-0.0226%13 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0720%13 Jul
cache5–13-0.059%13 Jul
cache13–2-0.0332%12 Jul
train13–9-0.0626%12 Jul
fachwerk13–3-0.0417%12 Jul
boulder13–3-0.0617%12 Jul
shelter12–12-0.0525%12 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0418%17 Dec
vertigo12–12-0.0329%23 Oct
agency13–11-0.0415%7 Aug
vertigo13–10.0345%7 Aug
anubis6–13-0.1032%6 Aug
nuke16–130.0622%3 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0713%3 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0413%28 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0741%28 Jul
agency13–3-0.0335%27 Jul
grail13–40.0233%27 Jul
nuke7–130.0331%4 Apr
vertigo6–130.0338%3 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0018%2 Apr
overpass13–9-0.0950%23 Mar
mirage13–110.0115%8 Mar
train13–00.0220%8 Mar
office13–2-0.0113%8 Mar
mirage8–13-0.1118%3 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0918%2 Mar
edin12–12-0.0245%8 Dec
basalt13–6-0.0660%8 Dec
vertigo13–70.0418%4 Dec
inferno6–13-0.0716%23 Nov
ancient11–13-0.0523%23 Nov
ancient4–13-0.0926%15 Nov
ancient1–13-0.1224%14 Nov
nuke14–16-0.0921%18 Oct
inferno0–9-0.0536%30 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0615%4 Aug
mirage13–70.0012%29 Jul
dust25–13-0.0819%28 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0222%28 Jul
dust213–11-0.0714%28 Jul
mirage6–13-0.1020%27 Jul
dust26–13-0.1120%27 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0711%27 Jul
mills13–1-0.0122%27 Jul
office8–13-0.0733%27 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0423%27 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0436%25 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0422%25 Jul
overpass13–9-0.0116%21 Jul
overpass5–0-0.0950%21 Jul
thera13–11-0.0632%21 Jul
mills12–12-0.0526%16 Jul
thera11–13-0.0530%15 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0517%15 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0823%2 Jun
anubis9–13-0.090%2 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0916%2 Jun
mirage13–100.1218%19 May
inferno13–1-0.0125%18 May
dust213–7-0.097%6 May
dust211–13-0.1125%6 May
mirage10–13-0.0945%28 Apr
nuke0–10-0.1125%28 Apr
anubis13–7-0.1011%12 Apr
dust213–4-0.0519%12 Apr
nuke16–13-0.1213%11 Feb
overpass16–12-0.0523%10 Feb
vertigo13–100.0320%9 Jan
vertigo2–13-0.0832%31 Dec
anubis11–130.0837%31 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0127%30 Dec
nuke6–130.0217%30 Dec
vertigo2–13-0.0326%29 Dec
vertigo7–13-0.0528%21 Dec
anubis13–8-0.0321%15 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0822%15 Dec
dust213–4-0.0224%14 Dec
office10–20.0118%14 Dec
overpass9–60.0321%10 Dec
mirage13–60.1629%10 Dec
nuke13–30.1728%10 Dec
nuke13–50.0629%10 Dec
overpass13–80.0218%10 Dec
overpass13–80.0538%10 Dec
dust210–13-0.0212%10 Dec
inferno13–110.0033%9 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0923%9 Dec
anubis9–13-0.104%6 Dec
overpass4–13-0.1267%6 Dec
mirage6–13-0.1123%5 Dec
mirage5–13-0.1124%4 Dec
anubis16–13-0.1112%4 Dec
anubis15–150.0325%1 Dec
mirage13–8-0.0318%1 Dec
vertigo2–13-0.0034%30 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →