William ツ — CS2 Stats

76561198068836153[U:1:108570425]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

747Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,306Hours in CS51Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,293Purple band · top ~11.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#25486 of 60675 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

19,293Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 19,293
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 707 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-31
Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,502), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 6 median	Level 7 median	vs Level 7
Headshot rate	35.0%	44.7%	46.0%	11.0% short
Shot accuracy	20.3%	12.1%	12.6%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.90	1.04	1.06	0.15 short
Match win rate	42.6%	45.2%	45.8%	3.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning63

Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–48Last 10052%Win rateLWLWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8

Aggression9.5

Utility4.6

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels4.3

Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning6.3

Utility4.6

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels4.3

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time463ms−88ms

first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 463ms

Headshot accuracy20.7%+1.7%

first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–9

13–0Biggest win — anubis

5Longest win streak

9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 90% over 10ancientWeakest map · 36% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	29	14–15	48%	0.01
nuke	B	23	11–12	48%	-0.01
ancient	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.02
anubis	S	10	9–1	90%	-0.00
dust2	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.02
cache	S	7	5–2	71%	-0.00
inferno	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

91,599Lifetime kills

0.90K/D

5,216Matches

42.6%Match win rate

35.0%Headshot %

20.3%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 6 players

12,062MVPs

2,222Hours (in match)

3,795Bombs planted

805Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP27,413

AK-4723,574

M4A4 / M4A1-S11,198

Desert Eagle5,711

P2000 / USP-S5,331

Glock-183,222

FAMAS1,494

AUG1,470

MAC-101,215

MP91,208

Lifetime map wins

6,732nuke

5,336inferno

4,768dust2

2,649train

477cbble

387vertigo

99lake

32ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

897Matches

50%Win rate

1.01Avg K/D

73.6ADR

35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

15%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	88	57%	1.15	16.0
Anubis	51	43%	1.05	17.2
Ancient	43	53%	1.14	16.2
Nuke	35	51%	0.97	15.8
Inferno	35	60%	1.06	16.2
Dust2	26	50%	1.05	16.3
Vertigo	16	56%	0.92	14.4
Cache	8	62%	1.28	19.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy

36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.8%Spray accuracy

78.8%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

455msReaction time

37.1%T opening success

57.7%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

10.9%Flash assists

7.04HE damage / grenade

3.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.4127 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.0846% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	8–13	-0.02	11%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.03	23%	29 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.01	21%	28 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.06	28%	28 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.05	17%	28 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	12%	27 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.01	24%	24 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.12	13%	21 Aug →
nuke	19–16	0.02	16%	20 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	15%	19 Aug →
mirage	16–19	-0.00	21%	17 Aug →
nuke	6–8	-0.11	33%	17 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	39%	17 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	7%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–0	0.08	21%	17 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	31%	17 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.04	24%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.06	22%	16 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	19%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.05	19%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.04	17%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.05	17%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.03	12%	16 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	30%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	32%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	16%	14 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.08	31%	14 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	11%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.08	20%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	23%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.03	19%	14 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.00	13%	14 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.03	28%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.09	23%	14 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.04	24%	13 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	20%	13 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.02	34%	13 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.02	17%	12 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.06	7%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	40%	12 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.02	29%	12 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	21%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.14	24%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.06	10%	10 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.02	15%	9 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	33%	7 May →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	24%	6 May →
ancient	9–13	0.04	20%	6 May →
nuke	8–13	0.02	11%	6 May →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	9%	6 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	15%	5 May →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	12%	5 May →
anubis	13–5	0.00	5%	5 May →
ancient	5–13	-0.14	0%	5 May →
mirage	13–6	0.06	25%	5 May →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	22%	4 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	20%	4 May →
anubis	13–3	-0.03	25%	4 May →
mirage	2–13	0.07	29%	4 May →
nuke	16–12	-0.03	16%	4 May →
nuke	13–6	0.01	9%	3 May →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	26%	3 May →
anubis	13–2	-0.02	19%	3 May →
mirage	13–10	0.04	10%	3 May →
dust2	10–13	0.04	11%	3 May →
ancient	0–3	-0.06	33%	3 May →
nuke	13–6	-0.04	16%	3 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	15%	3 May →
ancient	11–13	0.00	14%	3 May →
nuke	1–13	-0.01	17%	3 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	17%	3 May →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	22%	2 May →
ancient	13–6	0.06	15%	2 May →
mirage	13–11	0.01	31%	2 May →
anubis	13–4	-0.05	17%	2 May →
nuke	13–4	-0.03	38%	2 May →
anubis	13–6	-0.00	16%	2 May →
nuke	14–16	-0.03	17%	2 May →
nuke	7–11	0.02	21%	2 May →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	20%	2 May →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	25%	2 May →
inferno	13–2	0.05	11%	2 May →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	16%	2 May →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	25%	2 May →
nuke	11–13	0.02	19%	1 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	10%	1 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	5%	1 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	28%	1 May →
mirage	16–14	0.01	33%	1 May →
ancient	13–8	0.03	26%	1 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	26%	1 May →
anubis	13–10	0.00	9%	1 May →
mirage	9–2	0.09	25%	1 May →
dust2	13–7	-0.06	11%	1 May →
nuke	5–13	-0.07	10%	1 May →
mirage	13–11	0.06	30%	1 May →
ancient	16–12	0.03	17%	1 May →
inferno	8–13	0.05	21%	30 Apr →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	9%	30 Apr →
nuke	16–13	0.08	14%	29 Apr →