Sane — CS2 Stats

76561198140940102[U:1:180674374]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,467Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,249Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#12071 of 59721 tracked

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80

Positioning61

Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55–41–4Last 10055%Win rateLWLWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0

Aggression7.1

Utility7.5

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0

Positioning6.1

Utility7.5

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time579ms−43ms

first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms

Headshot accuracy19.6%−0.8%

first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — dust2 13–4

13–2Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 12dust2Weakest map · 36% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	21	11–10	52%	0.02
nuke	A	17	10–7	59%	0.02
dust2	C	14	5–9	36%	0.02
cache	A	13	8–5	62%	0.03
ancient	C	12	5–7	42%	0.02
inferno	S	12	9–3	75%	-0.00
anubis	S	6	4–2	67%	0.03
overpass	A	5	3–2	60%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

977Matches

52%Win rate

1.27Avg K/D

91.9ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

28%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	131	53%	1.21	17.1
Anubis	92	57%	1.20	18.4
Nuke	67	49%	1.23	18.9
Ancient	66	55%	1.33	19.5
Inferno	65	51%	1.21	17.6
Dust2	53	49%	1.35	17.2
Vertigo	21	38%	1.12	18.0
Cache	10	60%	1.45	20.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy

36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.4%Spray accuracy

81.5%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

578msReaction time

31.5%T opening success

54.0%CT opening success

0.71Enemies flashed / flash

9.6%Flash assists

13.84HE damage / grenade

12.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.5269% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	8–13	-0.04	16%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.07	13%	29 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.02	29%	28 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.09	20%	28 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	19%	28 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	18%	27 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.00	25%	27 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	20%	26 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.10	22%	24 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.02	25%	21 Aug →
nuke	19–16	0.01	15%	20 Aug →
mirage	16–19	0.05	17%	17 Aug →
nuke	6–8	-0.04	17%	17 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	13%	17 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	14%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.00	12%	16 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.03	26%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.10	34%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.03	37%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	31%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.06	18%	16 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.08	25%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	11%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.05	15%	14 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	15%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.03	29%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.04	10%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.00	20%	14 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.11	16%	14 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	16%	14 Aug →
overpass	13–9	0.02	17%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.06	13%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.03	17%	11 Aug →
overpass	12–12	0.00	17%	11 Aug →
cache	0–13	-0.05	42%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	13%	1 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.04	18%	1 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.02	15%	26 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.02	20%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.04	15%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.04	21%	25 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	19%	21 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	19%	20 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.00	32%	19 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.05	24%	19 Jul →
dust2	2–7	-0.03	46%	19 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.01	24%	18 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	18%	18 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	9%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.00	29%	18 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	27%	17 Jul →
cache	6–1	0.05	14%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.06	17%	17 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.04	11%	17 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.00	14%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.16	29%	12 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.04	18%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.02	33%	10 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.03	38%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	16%	7 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.08	24%	7 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.06	16%	22 May →
ancient	16–12	0.01	20%	21 May →
inferno	16–14	-0.04	25%	17 May →
cache	13–2	-0.06	17%	16 May →
nuke	13–4	0.08	27%	15 May →
overpass	14–16	0.01	20%	15 May →
mirage	13–11	0.06	8%	15 May →
dust2	8–13	0.06	28%	15 May →
inferno	13–9	0.03	24%	15 May →
mirage	6–13	0.03	23%	15 May →
ancient	15–15	-0.00	17%	13 May →
nuke	13–3	0.06	24%	13 May →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	19%	13 May →
nuke	16–13	0.05	36%	11 May →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	15%	11 May →
inferno	13–11	0.03	34%	11 May →
nuke	13–9	0.07	29%	11 May →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	19%	10 May →
overpass	16–13	0.02	20%	10 May →
nuke	10–13	0.03	37%	10 May →
overpass	13–10	0.06	24%	8 May →
mirage	13–8	0.09	28%	8 May →
dust2	10–13	0.00	30%	7 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	11%	7 May →
inferno	13–11	0.03	9%	6 May →
ancient	9–13	0.02	10%	6 May →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	21%	6 May →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	13%	6 May →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	14%	5 May →
anubis	13–5	0.12	21%	5 May →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	11%	5 May →
mirage	13–6	0.06	17%	5 May →
mirage	13–8	0.06	19%	5 May →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	29%	4 May →
mirage	5–13	0.02	14%	4 May →
anubis	13–3	0.03	26%	4 May →
ancient	13–6	0.10	13%	2 May →
mirage	13–11	0.01	21%	2 May →
anubis	13–4	-0.03	8%	2 May →