ChetS

ChetS — CS2 Stats

IN76561198066108732[U:1:105843004]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,464Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,822Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.5 Learning
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning33
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45523Last 10045%Win rateLLLLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -70pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.9
Aggression2.1
Utility4.3
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 652ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning3.3
Utility4.3
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact1.7

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time643ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+7.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — office 13–7
133Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
L9Current streak
129In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C31131842%-0.02
mirageB158753%-0.01
ancientA117464%-0.01
infernoD113827%-0.01
anubisA95456%-0.01
nukeB84450%0.01
overpassC83538%0.02
cache4040%0.00
train21150%-0.04
office110100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

168,230Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
8,430Matches
47.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
45.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
11.8%Shot accuracy
19,262MVPs
3,917Hours (in match)
11,897Bombs planted
2,529Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4753,985
AWP23,140
P908,817
MP94,660
Tec-94,574
MAC-104,021
P2503,951

Lifetime map wins

32,367dust2
12,870inferno
5,059nuke
5,033vertigo
1,669train
169cbble
47italy
44dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,951Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
75.9ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust255552%0.9815.2
Ancient54753%0.9714.9
Mirage43141%0.8913.9
Anubis35445%0.9114.8
Vertigo21854%0.9915.2
Inferno20350%0.9914.8
Nuke17652%1.0015.1
Overpass5751%1.0315.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
70.6%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
652msReaction time
22.5%T opening success
26.9%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
7.65HE damage / grenade
7.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4974 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.511% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0521%12 Aug
cache14–160.0518%12 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0221%12 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0213%12 Aug
cache11–13-0.0316%11 Aug
inferno11–130.0221%4 Aug
dust212–16-0.0719%3 Aug
mirage1–7-0.0433%23 Jul
cache11–13-0.0312%23 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0120%16 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0524%10 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0424%1 Jul
dust213–9-0.0536%1 Jul
inferno2–13-0.1115%1 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0016%1 Jul
dust24–13-0.0915%1 Jul
dust213–11-0.0530%30 Jun
nuke13–11-0.017%26 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0024%26 Jun
dust216–13-0.0524%20 Jun
anubis1–13-0.0714%20 Jun
dust26–13-0.068%17 Jun
dust26–13-0.0125%17 Jun
dust216–14-0.0019%16 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0532%16 Jun
dust21–6-0.0456%16 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0026%16 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0625%11 Jun
inferno13–100.0826%5 Jun
dust213–6-0.0233%1 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0418%29 May
inferno8–130.0321%29 May
dust24–13-0.0633%26 May
dust213–110.0726%26 May
dust29–13-0.0317%16 May
ancient9–13-0.0215%14 May
mirage15–150.0523%12 May
dust27–13-0.0832%30 Apr
cache12–120.0317%29 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0622%28 Apr
dust24–13-0.0435%26 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0222%21 Apr
dust210–13-0.0124%20 Apr
dust213–90.0620%14 Apr
office13–70.1613%18 Mar
overpass13–110.059%17 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0510%14 Mar
dust210–130.0014%11 Mar
ancient13–100.0419%4 Mar
dust213–30.0415%4 Mar
dust28–13-0.139%20 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0012%13 Feb
dust213–7-0.0312%11 Feb
overpass6–13-0.049%11 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0415%10 Feb
mirage13–110.0114%7 Feb
overpass13–110.0618%6 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0211%5 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0017%4 Feb
dust24–13-0.0729%4 Feb
nuke2–130.1018%3 Feb
dust29–130.0913%3 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0116%2 Feb
dust213–100.0018%28 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0127%26 Jan
overpass13–30.0715%23 Jan
dust27–130.0120%23 Jan
nuke3–13-0.099%23 Jan
anubis13–40.0721%23 Jan
ancient4–130.017%20 Jan
inferno13–7-0.0215%19 Jan
dust214–16-0.0218%12 Jan
anubis14–160.0316%12 Jan
anubis13–11-0.0222%12 Jan
ancient16–13-0.0126%8 Jan
inferno13–90.0314%5 Jan
overpass15–15-0.0415%5 Jan
mirage13–70.0523%31 Dec
train16–12-0.0410%30 Dec
overpass7–13-0.0313%30 Dec
mirage13–110.0318%29 Dec
dust29–13-0.0815%29 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0818%29 Dec
mirage16–12-0.0319%28 Dec
nuke13–50.1320%28 Dec
ancient13–70.0215%24 Dec
dust213–110.1115%10 Dec
ancient7–13-0.047%3 Dec
ancient13–6-0.0327%29 Nov
overpass13–160.0414%29 Nov
dust212–16-0.0414%25 Nov
ancient13–11-0.019%25 Nov
overpass14–160.0212%25 Nov
ancient13–30.0111%24 Nov
dust213–4-0.0122%19 Nov
mirage13–80.0415%19 Nov
train5–13-0.0512%16 Nov
dust213–40.0415%16 Nov
mirage13–6-0.0512%16 Nov
nuke9–13-0.0112%15 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →