NotUrPham

NotUrPham — CS2 Stats

CA76561198063001276[U:1:102735548]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

443Tracked matches55%Win rate2026Tracked since
669Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,896Blue band · top ~28.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33420 of 54918 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,468), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate61.8%41.4%44.2%above
Shot accuracy8.8%9.0%11.6%2.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.880.971.03above
Match win rate38.6%43.7%45.2%6.6% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNotUrPhamPREMIER14,896 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning43
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51418Last 10051%Win rateLLLWLLWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression5.3
Utility6.3
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.3
Utility6.3
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time650ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 674ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms
Headshot accuracy11.7%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 11.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–6
130Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 70% over 23dust2Weakest map · 33% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2791833%-0.00
mirageS2316770%0.00
infernoA1610663%-0.00
ancientA116555%-0.01
nukeA106460%0.02
cacheC94544%0.02
overpass2020%0.03
anubis1010%-0.04
train1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

38,555Lifetime kills
1.88K/D · Top 5% of Blue band
1,101Matches
38.6%Match win rate
61.8%Headshot % · Top 5% of Blue band
8.8%Shot accuracy
1,462MVPs
398Hours (in match)
1,159Bombs planted
237Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,784nuke
1,291dust2
1,233inferno
249vertigo
234office
101train
32dust
20italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.7%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
86.0%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
644msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
43.3%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
7.60HE damage / grenade
12.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.6996% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7227% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–130.1019%27 Aug
cache12–70.0513%20 Aug
dust24–110.096%20 Aug
mirage13–60.159%2 Aug
nuke3–130.0612%2 Aug
inferno13–16-0.067%1 Aug
dust213–60.1213%1 Aug
inferno13–8-0.076%30 Jul
dust212–12-0.0414%30 Jul
dust213–10-0.034%28 Jul
ancient13–40.1211%28 Jul
mirage6–13-0.039%28 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0411%28 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0113%27 Jul
mirage13–90.0516%27 Jul
ancient13–11-0.065%27 Jul
cache11–13-0.0313%27 Jul
dust26–13-0.027%26 Jul
inferno9–130.0515%26 Jul
cache9–13-0.026%26 Jul
mirage13–20.1310%23 Jul
mirage13–90.0611%23 Jul
dust213–30.1219%23 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0730%22 Jul
nuke13–9-0.067%22 Jul
dust213–9-0.0012%21 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0514%21 Jul
cache13–5-0.0411%21 Jul
nuke13–90.0515%18 Jul
mirage13–50.0715%18 Jul
mirage13–11-0.018%17 Jul
cache8–13-0.0114%17 Jul
inferno13–40.029%17 Jul
nuke13–00.0612%17 Jul
cache13–50.0914%16 Jul
dust27–13-0.0418%16 Jul
dust212–12-0.0412%16 Jul
dust23–130.0211%16 Jul
dust27–130.0029%6 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0315%6 Jul
dust213–6-0.0111%5 Jul
mirage13–80.0513%5 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0514%5 Jul
dust213–16-0.0312%5 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0711%5 Jul
inferno13–30.0315%5 Jul
dust29–13-0.0312%5 Jul
dust215–15-0.0217%4 Jul
mirage13–100.0714%4 Jul
nuke13–90.0413%4 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0210%4 Jul
dust213–9-0.0228%4 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0512%4 Jul
mirage11–13-0.056%4 Jul
inferno8–130.0021%4 Jul
mirage11–13-0.059%4 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0518%4 Jul
ancient16–130.019%3 Jul
dust213–8-0.0122%3 Jul
inferno13–8-0.049%3 Jul
ancient13–80.0412%3 Jul
nuke15–150.016%3 Jul
dust213–60.1523%3 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0617%3 Jul
inferno12–160.0122%2 Jul
dust28–13-0.0715%2 Jul
dust211–13-0.0517%2 Jul
overpass11–13-0.018%2 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0116%2 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0317%30 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0318%30 Jun
inferno11–130.0619%30 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0217%29 Jun
nuke13–60.068%29 Jun
overpass5–130.0711%29 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0514%28 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0919%28 Jun
dust212–12-0.0014%28 Jun
dust23–13-0.0611%27 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0210%27 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0323%27 Jun
inferno13–60.0517%27 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0619%27 Jun
dust213–7-0.057%27 Jun
dust211–13-0.0314%27 Jun
dust27–13-0.0516%23 Jun
mirage13–90.0416%23 Jun
cache13–00.1221%20 Jun
ancient6–130.0210%20 Jun
ancient9–13-0.017%20 Jun
cache11–13-0.038%20 Jun
inferno13–70.0219%20 Jun
cache13–30.029%18 Jun
mirage13–10.027%18 Jun
dust26–13-0.009%18 Jun
train12–120.0511%18 Jun
nuke13–70.0515%18 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0613%17 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0217%17 Jun
inferno13–100.0214%17 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →