ButtMudd 2.0

ButtMudd 2.0 — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198206575235[U:1:246309507]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

337Tracked matches41%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,468Purple band · top ~18.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#28583 of 56418 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGButtMudd 2.0PREMIER17,468 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning50
Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47503Last 10047%Win rateWLWWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim6.9
Aggression5.0
Utility7.8
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.1

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.0
Utility7.8
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time543ms+38ms
first ⅓ avg 504ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy13.1%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.3% → last ⅓ avg 13.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–8
131Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 76% over 17ancientWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB27131448%0.00
dust2C26111542%-0.00
infernoS1713476%0.01
ancientD124833%0.00
cacheD93633%0.01
nukeB63350%-0.05
anubis2020%-0.01
fachwerk1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.5%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.1%Spray accuracy
80.8%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
552msReaction time
23.7%T opening success
45.4%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
11.62HE damage / grenade
19.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.5127% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.745% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.1410%24 Aug
dust211–13-0.0419%24 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0215%14 Aug
inferno13–100.0811%13 Aug
cache4–13-0.019%13 Aug
dust213–90.0614%12 Aug
inferno13–110.027%12 Aug
mirage13–90.0515%11 Aug
dust21–13-0.0412%11 Aug
anubis4–13-0.037%11 Aug
dust26–130.0127%11 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0413%10 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0314%10 Aug
mirage13–110.1115%6 Aug
dust23–13-0.0029%6 Aug
dust28–13-0.0625%6 Aug
dust213–50.1314%5 Aug
ancient7–130.068%5 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0715%5 Aug
cache13–50.0010%3 Aug
cache10–13-0.0421%3 Aug
cache15–150.0213%26 Jul
mirage13–11-0.055%26 Jul
inferno13–80.0110%25 Jul
dust20–2-0.170%22 Jul
mirage6–13-0.048%22 Jul
ancient6–130.019%22 Jul
cache1–130.0114%20 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0315%20 Jul
mirage0–8-0.077%12 Jul
ancient5–13-0.079%12 Jul
dust28–13-0.0219%12 Jul
nuke16–130.0214%12 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0812%12 Jul
inferno13–3-0.057%12 Jul
dust22–13-0.083%12 Jul
inferno9–13-0.028%12 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0110%12 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0325%12 Jul
cache13–6-0.016%12 Jul
mirage13–20.1414%12 Jul
dust213–6-0.0416%12 Jul
dust27–13-0.068%12 Jul
mirage16–130.0114%11 Jul
ancient13–20.1016%11 Jul
dust213–5-0.0512%11 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0415%11 Jul
cache9–13-0.0119%11 Jul
dust213–10.0529%11 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0511%11 Jul
ancient15–15-0.019%10 Jul
mirage13–50.0516%10 Jul
dust28–13-0.078%10 Jul
cache3–13-0.0134%10 Jul
cache13–100.1015%10 Jul
fachwerk3–13-0.0522%10 Jul
inferno13–8-0.016%8 Jul
inferno13–60.0217%8 Jul
inferno3–13-0.044%7 Jul
dust213–70.0014%7 Jul
dust213–60.0925%5 Jul
mirage13–80.0512%5 Jul
mirage13–50.0115%5 Jul
dust213–9-0.0210%4 Jul
inferno13–30.1016%4 Jul
mirage11–130.0216%4 Jul
inferno8–13-0.029%4 Jul
dust211–130.0123%4 Jul
inferno13–60.0310%2 Jul
mirage13–10-0.049%2 Jul
ancient13–50.0612%2 Jul
ancient13–4-0.059%2 Jul
dust22–13-0.0021%2 Jul
dust25–13-0.0126%2 Jul
mirage2–40.000%2 Jul
nuke13–110.0113%2 Jul
dust213–50.0213%2 Jul
ancient7–13-0.017%1 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0512%1 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0417%1 Jul
mirage3–130.0821%1 Jul
mirage13–100.0211%1 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0112%29 Jun
anubis5–130.0212%29 Jun
inferno13–20.0422%29 Jun
dust26–130.0220%29 Jun
inferno13–10-0.044%29 Jun
mirage8–130.0610%29 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0313%28 Jun
ancient8–130.0115%28 Jun
mirage8–130.0113%27 Jun
inferno13–8-0.038%27 Jun
inferno13–60.0417%27 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0013%27 Jun
dust213–70.0415%27 Jun
nuke13–10-0.210%27 Jun
nuke7–13-0.078%27 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0422%27 Jun
inferno13–40.0423%27 Jun
dust27–13-0.0112%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →