Wutangable

Wutangable — CS2 Stats

US76561198060683752[U:1:100418024]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

700Tracked matches69%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,102Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,774Purple band · top ~25.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15250 of 25115 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 947 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate43.3%42.5%44.2%0.9% short
Shot accuracy7.6%10.9%11.2%3.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.850.991.040.19 short
Match win rate41.5%44.2%45.3%3.8% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWutangableFACEITLevel 4 · 947 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,774 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning59
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54433Last 10054%Win rateWWWWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression7.2
Utility6.3
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.4

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.9
Utility6.3
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time651ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 686ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — cache 13–3
131Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
W6Current streak
411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 33% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD2171433%-0.02
mirageA1811761%-0.02
cacheB136746%-0.01
ancientA138562%0.00
infernoA117464%-0.03
dust2A106460%0.01
overpassS75271%-0.00
anubisB63350%0.01
vertigo110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

27,993Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
1,698Matches
41.5%Match win rate
43.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
7.6%Shot accuracy
3,612MVPs
763Hours (in match)
1,866Bombs planted
443Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,037dust2
1,916nuke
1,850inferno
422train
171office
152vertigo
146cbble
38italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

85Matches
40%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
77.6ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2429%0.8013.3
Inferno1947%0.7511.4
Dust21450%0.9713.2
Nuke1242%0.8613.3
Overpass729%0.9516.4
Train520%0.9112.8
Ancient250%0.6111.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
89.0%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
653msReaction time
35.3%T opening success
56.4%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
11.35HE damage / grenade
9.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.262% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–40.0327%19 Aug
dust213–60.0416%17 Aug
nuke13–90.0126%17 Aug
mirage13–70.0520%17 Aug
nuke13–20.0713%17 Aug
mirage13–90.0011%17 Aug
dust23–13-0.0319%16 Aug
nuke11–130.0320%16 Aug
dust24–130.0116%16 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0631%16 Aug
cache13–30.1021%20 Jul
dust213–90.0422%20 Jul
ancient11–130.0220%20 Jul
mirage13–30.0418%20 Jul
cache11–13-0.0718%19 Jul
nuke13–100.0224%19 Jul
anubis8–130.047%18 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0517%18 Jul
cache13–7-0.0911%18 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0018%18 Jul
ancient16–130.0317%18 Jul
ancient13–30.0722%17 Jul
mirage15–15-0.028%17 Jul
nuke13–7-0.068%17 Jul
anubis13–60.0424%17 Jul
cache13–9-0.0313%17 Jul
ancient13–50.0113%17 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0115%17 Jul
cache13–9-0.0116%15 Jul
cache13–70.0612%14 Jul
dust212–160.0116%14 Jul
anubis13–80.0310%14 Jul
inferno4–12-0.0721%14 Jul
mirage6–13-0.089%14 Jul
nuke11–13-0.045%14 Jul
mirage13–11-0.045%14 Jul
cache4–13-0.049%13 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0420%13 Jul
inferno5–13-0.1314%12 Jul
mirage8–13-0.079%12 Jul
ancient13–100.0319%12 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0315%12 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0313%12 Jul
mirage13–30.0216%12 Jul
ancient13–8-0.076%11 Jul
ancient15–150.0314%9 Jul
cache15–150.0114%9 Jul
dust213–60.0422%9 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0518%9 Jul
ancient10–130.0625%9 Jul
inferno13–110.0017%9 Jul
nuke7–130.018%9 Jul
mirage14–16-0.037%9 Jul
dust25–13-0.0314%6 Jul
dust213–8-0.0519%5 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0221%5 Jul
nuke13–100.0029%5 Jul
overpass16–13-0.0111%3 Jul
dust213–90.0113%3 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0213%30 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0310%30 Jun
overpass13–90.026%29 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0624%29 Jun
mirage13–20.0314%29 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0822%29 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0315%28 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0811%28 Jun
mirage14–160.0215%25 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0313%24 Jun
mirage13–40.017%24 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0117%24 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0213%24 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0115%23 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0117%23 Jun
overpass13–60.079%22 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0413%22 Jun
nuke1–9-0.0819%19 Jun
ancient9–130.0214%19 Jun
mirage1–9-0.100%19 Jun
mirage13–70.0113%17 Jun
inferno8–4-0.0710%17 Jun
cache11–13-0.0215%17 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0411%13 Jun
nuke11–13-0.037%13 Jun
mirage13–10-0.098%7 Jun
ancient13–6-0.049%7 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0116%7 Jun
cache7–130.049%7 Jun
inferno13–10.0613%7 Jun
overpass11–130.0419%6 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0220%6 Jun
overpass13–40.0417%6 Jun
vertigo13–60.0215%6 Jun
inferno13–110.0117%31 May
cache9–13-0.0515%28 May
anubis0–13-0.0242%27 May
anubis9–13-0.0110%27 May
cache3–13-0.0713%21 May
overpass7–13-0.0910%21 May
cache13–10-0.0117%17 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →