ConstantK — CS2 Stats

US76561198060581699[U:1:100315971]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,826Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since

4,520Hours in CS43Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,074Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1805 of 18532 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,997 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	54.3%	52.8%	above
Shot accuracy	9.7%	13.7%	4.0% short
Kill/death ratio	1.26	1.08	above
Match win rate	40.0%	49.2%	9.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning38

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–46–1Last 10053%Win rateLLLLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1

Aggression0.3

Utility5.0

Positioning3.8

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning3.8

Utility5.0

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time535ms−36ms

first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms

Headshot accuracy18.8%−4.6%

first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–5

13–0Biggest win — ancient

7Longest win streak

L4Current streak

11–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 20anubisWeakest map · 32% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	S	20	14–6	70%	0.03
anubis	D	19	6–13	32%	0.02
nuke	C	16	7–9	44%	-0.01
inferno	B	15	8–7	53%	0.03
mirage	A	10	6–4	60%	0.00
cache	C	7	3–4	43%	0.02
overpass	S	6	4–2	67%	0.03
dust2	—	4	2–2	50%	0.02
vertigo	—	3	3–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

167,169Lifetime kills

1.26K/D · Top 25% of tracked players

6,460Matches

40.0%Match win rate

54.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players

9.7%Shot accuracy

13,385MVPs

2,929Hours (in match)

6,451Bombs planted

1,678Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4783,993

M4A4 / M4A1-S31,789

Desert Eagle9,356

AWP8,023

P2000 / USP-S6,552

Glock-184,164

Galil AR2,979

MP71,918

MAC-101,791

P2501,762

Lifetime map wins

7,294inferno

4,540nuke

4,009dust2

3,702vertigo

782train

573cbble

60office

33lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,448Matches

50%Win rate

1.25Avg K/D

79.9ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	247	51%	1.26	17.1
Mirage	209	46%	1.22	17.1
Anubis	202	45%	1.21	16.8
Inferno	181	45%	1.26	16.8
Vertigo	124	57%	1.23	17.7
Nuke	90	52%	1.29	17.3
Overpass	74	61%	1.29	16.4
Dust2	53	51%	1.48	16.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy

36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.3%Spray accuracy

77.0%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

517msReaction time

24.2%T opening success

21.2%CT opening success

0.39Enemies flashed / flash

4.5%Flash assists

7.04HE damage / grenade

15.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3908 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 24.2303% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	0–13	-0.06	24%	28 Aug →
anubis	12–16	-0.02	9%	27 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	19%	26 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	7%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–0	0.04	22%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	21%	24 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.04	20%	22 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	19%	22 Aug →
vertigo	16–14	-0.02	16%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.08	13%	20 Aug →
vertigo	13–2	0.03	17%	19 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	20%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.05	24%	17 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.03	10%	16 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	4%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.05	20%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.08	17%	12 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	24%	11 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	20%	11 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	32%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.03	31%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.06	16%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.10	21%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.07	20%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.02	5%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.15	17%	7 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.01	26%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	26%	7 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.09	11%	4 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	21%	4 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.03	24%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.05	24%	2 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.04	23%	31 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.01	21%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.06	18%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–16	-0.09	15%	27 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.06	30%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.04	41%	26 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.05	32%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.06	14%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.01	19%	19 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.07	18%	18 Jul →
anubis	1–13	-0.06	0%	17 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	20%	17 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.02	23%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.02	19%	16 Jul →
nuke	16–13	0.01	24%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.03	37%	14 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.00	19%	10 Jul →
nuke	1–7	-0.04	67%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.06	24%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.05	28%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.04	20%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.03	19%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.03	15%	26 Jun →
overpass	13–11	-0.04	41%	26 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.02	23%	24 Jun →
anubis	8–13	0.02	20%	16 Jun →
anubis	10–13	0.04	22%	15 Jun →
cache	13–11	0.02	28%	15 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	18%	10 Jun →
inferno	6–9	0.03	16%	10 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.02	10%	8 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.07	32%	4 Jun →
vertigo	13–9	0.08	33%	3 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	18%	3 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.01	12%	31 May →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	35%	31 May →
overpass	9–13	0.07	16%	29 May →
nuke	13–8	0.01	23%	29 May →
overpass	13–6	-0.04	17%	28 May →
nuke	13–6	0.10	34%	28 May →
inferno	8–13	0.01	32%	28 May →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	17%	25 May →
ancient	13–7	0.00	18%	25 May →
overpass	13–7	0.14	25%	24 May →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	32%	23 May →
ancient	8–13	0.01	24%	23 May →
nuke	1–13	0.01	27%	22 May →
nuke	7–13	-0.00	21%	21 May →
overpass	6–13	0.01	32%	20 May →
mirage	13–11	0.03	26%	20 May →
overpass	13–9	0.02	26%	19 May →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	19%	19 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	26%	19 May →
anubis	8–13	0.01	17%	19 May →
anubis	9–13	0.03	29%	18 May →
anubis	13–10	0.05	13%	18 May →
cache	4–13	-0.03	23%	17 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	15%	16 May →
mirage	13–2	0.11	31%	15 May →
ancient	13–9	0.06	13%	14 May →
cache	7–13	0.04	27%	13 May →
ancient	10–13	0.01	27%	13 May →
anubis	10–13	0.07	21%	12 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	23%	11 May →
ancient	13–3	0.04	13%	11 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	20%	8 May →
nuke	16–19	-0.02	16%	6 May →
anubis	3–13	0.02	32%	6 May →