no_thrill — CS2 Stats

MC76561198054211457[U:1:93945729]Steam profile ↗

2,194Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,979Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,224Purple band · top ~15.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#12549 of 24353 tracked

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,133 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	50.7%	44.2%	44.9%	above
Shot accuracy	12.4%	11.2%	11.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.16	1.04	1.04	above
Match win rate	47.8%	45.3%	45.3%	above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 6 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning55

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateLWWLWTWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6

Aggression7.9

Utility4.9

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels4.0

Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning5.5

Utility4.9

Mechanics8.3

Opening Duels4.0

Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time587ms−56ms

first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms

Headshot accuracy26.9%+2.5%

first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 26.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — mirage 13–2

13–0Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

1–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	23	13–10	57%	0.04
cache	A	18	11–7	61%	0.03
nuke	C	16	6–10	38%	-0.01
dust2	B	15	7–8	47%	0.02
inferno	A	10	6–4	60%	0.02
ancient	A	8	5–3	63%	0.02
anubis	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.01
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.07
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.14
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

111,632Lifetime kills

1.16K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players

5,014Matches

47.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players

50.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players

12.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players

12,262MVPs

2,191Hours (in match)

2,682Bombs planted

1,454Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,880

AWP18,982

M4A4 / M4A1-S13,868

Desert Eagle10,660

P2000 / USP-S8,299

SSG 084,796

Glock-184,492

MAC-101,920

Galil AR1,481

P2501,431

Lifetime map wins

7,673inferno

7,247dust2

2,587nuke

1,703train

1,042cbble

411vertigo

149lake

65shorttrain

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

147Matches

46%Win rate

1.14Avg K/D

93.4ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

14%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	18	67%	1.64	21.8
Dust2	10	60%	1.10	17.5
Overpass	9	44%	1.24	23.3
Inferno	5	40%	1.00	13.6
Ancient	4	25%	0.80	13.3
Anubis	3	67%	1.10	15.0
Train	2	0%	1.16	18.5
Vertigo	1	100%	1.20	30.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.3%Headshot accuracy

35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.9%Spray accuracy

87.2%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

574msReaction time

32.0%T opening success

59.7%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

3.4%Flash assists

7.57HE damage / grenade

17.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4836 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.9927% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	11–13	-0.05	22%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.03	0%	26 Aug →
office	13–7	0.14	21%	25 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	27%	22 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.05	19%	17 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.02	27%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–1	-0.03	27%	16 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.09	83%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	36%	15 Aug →
eldorado	9–6	-0.14	24%	11 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	23%	9 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.05	14%	9 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.03	23%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.00	23%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	30%	9 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	31%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.10	27%	7 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	25%	7 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	25%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.16	33%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.06	43%	6 Aug →
nuke	2–9	-0.01	30%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.06	27%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.03	16%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.01	24%	29 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.07	18%	28 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.04	28%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.02	20%	28 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.08	39%	28 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	31%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.08	28%	27 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.03	21%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.01	22%	26 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.03	24%	26 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	30%	26 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.09	33%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.04	25%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.05	26%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	27%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.11	18%	25 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.01	25%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.13	22%	25 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.02	9%	25 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.03	19%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.23	28%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.10	30%	23 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	22%	22 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.01	26%	22 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.02	17%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.04	10%	20 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.08	47%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	28%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–2	-0.02	15%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.00	30%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.13	13%	14 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.02	16%	14 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.04	27%	14 Jul →
ancient	0–13	0.00	19%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.02	16%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.14	38%	13 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	41%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	14%	12 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.07	23%	12 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	22%	12 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.05	26%	12 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.01	22%	11 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.16	14%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.12	35%	11 Jul →
office	3–13	0.01	26%	11 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.01	21%	11 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	18%	11 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.02	13%	10 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.03	28%	8 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.03	23%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.01	38%	4 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.04	18%	3 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.03	33%	3 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.07	26%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.02	14%	3 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.00	22%	3 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.05	17%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.01	16%	28 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.07	30%	28 Jun →
mirage	16–14	0.06	27%	28 Jun →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	9%	28 Jun →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	26%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.04	23%	28 Jun →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	15%	27 Jun →
dust2	5–13	0.07	35%	27 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.08	13%	27 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.07	32%	27 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	24%	27 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.01	22%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.04	17%	26 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	39%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	22%	26 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	14%	25 Jun →
nuke	8–13	0.01	28%	25 Jun →
inferno	3–0	0.13	60%	25 Jun →
overpass	13–2	0.05	23%	25 Jun →