Clozza — CS2 Stats

GB76561198047185084[U:1:86919356]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

764Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since

1,546Hours in CS25Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,044Purple band · top ~24.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#22726 of 39437 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSilver Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	35.0%	46.1%	47.0%	12.0% short
Shot accuracy	13.4%	12.6%	12.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.08	1.05	1.07	meets
Match win rate	48.6%	45.7%	46.4%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning43

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateLLWWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9

Aggression5.1

Utility5.4

Positioning4.3

Opening Duels1.8

Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning4.3

Utility5.4

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels1.8

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time568ms−60ms

first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms

Headshot accuracy13.9%−3.6%

first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 13.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 13–1

13–1Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 78% over 18dust2Weakest map · 0% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	27	13–14	48%	0.02
cache	S	18	14–4	78%	0.02
inferno	A	15	9–6	60%	0.00
ancient	D	15	4–11	27%	0.00
mirage	B	8	4–4	50%	0.02
dust2	D	7	0–7	0%	0.01
anubis	D	6	1–5	17%	0.00
vertigo	—	4	3–1	75%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

39,205Lifetime kills

1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players

2,124Matches

48.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players

35.0%Headshot %

13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players

4,909MVPs

872Hours (in match)

2,242Bombs planted

518Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,529

M4A4 / M4A1-S9,929

AWP2,528

P2000 / USP-S2,167

P901,858

Glock-181,468

MP71,245

Galil AR884

Desert Eagle878

Five-SeveN824

Lifetime map wins

2,586inferno

2,167nuke

1,367dust2

519vertigo

385train

377safehouse

268cbble

248lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

48Matches

52%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

81.5ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win

38%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	14	50%	1.27	15.0
Cache	10	70%	1.28	15.3
Inferno	10	70%	1.12	18.0
Dust2	4	0%	1.03	16.0
Vertigo	4	75%	1.27	17.0
Ancient	3	33%	1.06	14.0
Anubis	2	0%	0.52	8.5
Mirage	1	0%	0.86	12.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.0%Headshot accuracy

39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.4%Spray accuracy

79.1%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

568msReaction time

36.6%T opening success

37.4%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

5.1%Flash assists

9.46HE damage / grenade

6.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.0356% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4921 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.5926% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	11–13	-0.01	6%	24 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	4%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.06	15%	23 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.04	15%	23 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	22%	20 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.03	23%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.04	3%	20 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.01	19%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.08	19%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.06	19%	20 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	-0.07	15%	20 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.04	9%	19 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.01	13%	19 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	18%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.05	9%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	18%	18 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.02	20%	17 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	10%	17 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.01	9%	17 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.05	17%	16 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	10%	16 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.02	13%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	15%	16 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.04	15%	16 Aug →
inferno	20–22	0.01	18%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	9%	16 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.05	19%	16 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	13%	16 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	15%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.02	4%	14 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.00	11%	14 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	24%	14 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	8%	12 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.04	9%	12 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.05	8%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.09	9%	11 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.02	11%	11 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.06	14%	9 Aug →
inferno	6–2	-0.06	0%	8 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.04	24%	8 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	23%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.00	10%	8 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	17%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.03	14%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.19	15%	4 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	16%	4 Aug →
ancient	12–16	-0.01	6%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.08	12%	3 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.00	10%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.04	12%	3 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.03	12%	2 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.01	20%	2 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.04	11%	2 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	17%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	16%	29 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	16%	29 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	20%	29 Jul →
nuke	1–13	-0.05	14%	29 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	8%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.12	21%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.04	14%	27 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.05	20%	27 Jul →
ancient	12–16	-0.04	12%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.07	18%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	11%	26 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.06	13%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	11%	25 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	15%	24 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.00	11%	24 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.03	7%	24 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	16%	24 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.00	15%	24 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	16%	23 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	13%	23 Jul →
cache	4–0	0.05	31%	23 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	11%	23 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	33%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.10	28%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.09	23%	23 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	13%	23 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.01	16%	21 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.04	9%	21 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.06	17%	21 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.06	20%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.03	12%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.07	5%	21 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.14	26%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.05	8%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.09	24%	20 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	8%	20 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	17%	20 Jul →
ancient	14–16	0.02	17%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.06	12%	20 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.05	9%	20 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.02	13%	19 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.03	50%	19 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.06	19%	19 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.07	19%	19 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	23%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	24%	19 Jul →