UnrankedTrash — CS2 Stats

76561198046388997[U:1:86123269]

425Tracked matches48%Win rate2024Tracked since
570Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.2 Learning
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGUnrankedTrashFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim24
Positioning42
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54442Last 10054%Win rateLLWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.4
Aggression2.3
Utility3.2
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 631ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.4
Positioning4.2
Utility3.2
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact4.4

Composite 3.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time637ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy9.9%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 8.6% → last ⅓ avg 9.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–2
131Biggest win — overpass
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 16infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B37191851%0.01
mirageB1910953%0.01
ancientA1610663%0.01
anubisA106460%0.01
cacheC73443%0.02
overpassA53260%0.03
infernoC52340%0.03
nuke110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,896Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
810Matches
40.9%Match win rate
30.4%Headshot %
1.9%Shot accuracy
1,840MVPs
313Hours (in match)
296Bombs planted
167Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,639dust2
782train
472inferno
150nuke
104vertigo
27office
12ar_shoots
9assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

53Matches
43%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
80.0ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22756%1.1216.9
Mirage1421%1.0518.1
Cache540%0.8011.6
Anubis30%0.8919.7
Ancient2100%1.6016.5
Overpass250%0.7612.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.4%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
67.8%Counter-strafing
17.0°Preaim
631msReaction time
22.1%T opening success
37.1%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
8.76HE damage / grenade
2.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 16.9941° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.3523% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4758 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–160.028%17 Jul
dust27–13-0.0117%17 Jul
ancient13–6-0.036%17 Jul
cache11–130.0413%17 Jul
cache2–13-0.0011%16 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0414%10 Jul
cache13–8-0.0211%10 Jul
dust213–110.0313%27 Jun
mirage13–60.0914%27 Jun
dust25–13-0.037%21 Jun
dust28–13-0.0214%21 Jun
mirage9–130.039%19 Jun
ancient8–130.037%19 Jun
dust213–90.074%14 Jun
cache12–12-0.018%14 Jun
mirage13–3-0.037%7 Jun
dust213–60.0615%10 May
overpass8–13-0.024%10 May
anubis13–7-0.017%10 May
cache13–20.0914%9 May
cache9–130.015%9 May
mirage4–13-0.038%9 May
dust210–13-0.015%9 May
mirage16–130.0212%8 May
cache8–10.050%8 May
mirage13–8-0.0214%8 May
ancient11–13-0.023%27 Apr
anubis5–130.0211%26 Apr
ancient13–90.0510%26 Apr
nuke9–20.020%26 Apr
mirage6–130.0223%26 Apr
mirage4–130.0615%23 Apr
dust215–15-0.0116%23 Apr
dust213–80.1018%22 Apr
anubis11–130.014%22 Apr
ancient13–90.0413%22 Apr
anubis16–120.005%20 Apr
dust29–13-0.068%20 Apr
overpass13–90.0710%19 Apr
dust213–30.059%19 Apr
dust213–90.0114%19 Apr
anubis13–60.047%18 Apr
dust213–11-0.066%18 Apr
overpass13–10-0.025%18 Apr
dust213–9-0.003%18 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0113%18 Apr
dust213–40.059%18 Apr
dust29–130.0816%17 Apr
ancient9–13-0.006%17 Apr
mirage13–40.0713%17 Apr
mirage10–13-0.083%17 Apr
ancient13–10-0.026%17 Apr
mirage13–6-0.016%16 Apr
dust29–13-0.0114%16 Apr
overpass3–130.0411%16 Apr
mirage13–7-0.022%16 Apr
mirage13–110.018%16 Apr
anubis3–130.019%16 Apr
dust211–13-0.072%16 Apr
dust213–20.033%16 Apr
dust213–100.004%15 Apr
ancient7–13-0.039%15 Apr
dust210–13-0.047%14 Apr
ancient13–11-0.017%14 Apr
anubis13–20.058%14 Apr
dust213–60.0211%13 Apr
ancient13–2-0.004%13 Apr
ancient13–110.036%13 Apr
dust28–130.019%13 Apr
ancient13–60.099%13 Apr
dust213–110.023%13 Apr
mirage13–90.006%13 Apr
dust213–110.0110%10 Apr
dust210–13-0.0127%10 Apr
dust213–7-0.042%9 Apr
ancient9–13-0.015%9 Apr
overpass13–10.098%9 Apr
mirage13–20.1615%9 Apr
inferno13–40.025%9 Apr
dust213–16-0.018%9 Apr
inferno8–130.0712%8 Apr
dust213–80.007%8 Apr
ancient13–100.005%8 Apr
anubis13–10-0.017%8 Apr
ancient13–60.116%7 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0310%7 Apr
inferno9–130.018%7 Apr
anubis10–13-0.037%7 Apr
dust213–90.0516%6 Apr
dust210–13-0.0211%6 Apr
inferno13–100.046%6 Apr
mirage5–13-0.044%6 Apr
dust212–160.0513%6 Apr
dust28–13-0.0210%6 Apr
dust213–50.0013%5 Apr
inferno12–160.0111%5 Apr
dust211–13-0.074%5 Apr
dust213–80.086%5 Apr
mirage9–130.027%5 Apr
anubis13–100.036%5 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →