shamw0w

shamw0w — CS2 Stats

US76561198043260321[U:1:82994593]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

798Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,524Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning58
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50419Last 10050%Win rateWLWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression6.4
Utility3.6
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch0.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.7° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.8
Utility3.6
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time564ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–6
130Biggest win — boulder
7Longest win streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 76% over 17boulderWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2071335%0.04
dust2S1713476%0.04
infernoB157847%0.06
anubisB137654%0.03
cacheC104640%0.02
nukeC83538%0.02
boulderD62433%0.03
fachwerk43175%0.01
vertigo31233%-0.02
ancient21150%0.06
train110100%0.04
shelter110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

188,290Lifetime kills
1.62K/D · Top 5% of tracked players
6,743Matches
28.7%Match win rate
58.2%Headshot % · Top 10% of tracked players
21.6%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of tracked players
10,160MVPs
1,651Hours (in match)
3,540Bombs planted
847Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4747,059
SSG 0822,619
AWP8,160
P2507,122
FAMAS4,061

Lifetime map wins

5,625dust2
1,625inferno
1,130nuke
646vertigo
486lake
344cbble
339train
336office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

17Matches
35%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
98.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage333%1.4216.0
Ancient333%1.4220.7
Inferno250%0.919.0
Nuke250%1.6619.0
Dust2250%1.3831.5
Anubis1100%2.0032.0
Cache10%1.0716.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
41.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.6%Spray accuracy
90.2%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
582msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
9.18HE damage / grenade
3.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.329 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.1181% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0514%16 Aug
inferno10–130.0820%16 Aug
inferno13–70.0713%9 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0015%5 Aug
cache13–110.0616%2 Aug
boulder9–13-0.0327%30 Jul
boulder5–13-0.017%26 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0027%26 Jul
nuke13–20.1216%26 Jul
train13–90.0417%26 Jul
cache4–90.0716%25 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0022%25 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0211%22 Jul
boulder13–00.1424%19 Jul
fachwerk13–70.0383%19 Jul
shelter13–90.0222%13 Jul
dust27–130.0215%12 Jul
boulder3–13-0.0319%12 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0822%12 Jul
anubis13–70.1017%12 Jul
fachwerk6–130.0226%11 Jul
anubis13–20.1125%11 Jul
mirage3–130.0218%11 Jul
inferno13–100.0912%11 Jul
mirage12–120.0417%11 Jul
fachwerk13–50.0325%11 Jul
boulder3–130.0522%11 Jul
dust24–10.1175%11 Jul
fachwerk13–6-0.0332%11 Jul
boulder13–70.0435%11 Jul
dust213–90.1014%2 Jul
anubis13–90.038%2 Jul
anubis3–0-0.030%2 Jul
mirage13–110.1012%2 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0219%30 Jun
cache13–60.0424%30 Jun
dust213–30.087%30 Jun
mirage13–60.1523%30 Jun
nuke10–130.0317%29 Jun
inferno13–60.0411%29 Jun
mirage9–130.1121%27 Jun
dust213–8-0.0217%23 Jun
mirage5–130.0618%20 Jun
dust213–100.0222%20 Jun
inferno4–130.0220%20 Jun
cache0–8-0.0424%14 Jun
ancient13–80.1318%13 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0119%13 Jun
mirage13–90.0625%11 Jun
inferno5–70.1033%11 Jun
anubis10–130.0216%9 Jun
mirage13–80.0716%9 Jun
dust213–90.0216%9 Jun
cache5–30.1014%6 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0314%6 Jun
mirage11–130.0125%6 Jun
inferno13–30.1420%6 Jun
anubis0–9-0.0516%6 Jun
dust212–30.0233%6 Jun
mirage12–120.039%6 Jun
inferno8–130.0515%5 Jun
dust28–20.1118%5 Jun
inferno9–130.1217%4 Jun
mirage13–20.1213%4 Jun
anubis13–10.0310%4 Jun
dust24–130.0725%3 Jun
vertigo13–8-0.0010%3 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0428%3 Jun
anubis12–120.1215%2 Jun
mirage13–50.0810%2 Jun
dust213–3-0.067%2 Jun
anubis12–120.019%1 Jun
inferno13–80.0129%1 Jun
mirage9–130.0221%31 May
inferno13–90.0513%28 May
vertigo7–13-0.0224%28 May
anubis12–120.0215%27 May
nuke13–60.0629%27 May
mirage3–13-0.0515%27 May
inferno13–100.0718%26 May
mirage8–13-0.0017%25 May
dust28–40.010%25 May
dust213–70.0319%25 May
nuke7–13-0.0622%25 May
nuke2–13-0.0028%25 May
anubis13–110.0429%25 May
dust26–13-0.0021%24 May
mirage12–120.0928%24 May
vertigo8–13-0.0419%24 May
cache3–13-0.0614%24 May
inferno2–130.0915%24 May
mirage9–13-0.0611%24 May
cache10–130.0511%23 May
dust213–8-0.0113%23 May
cache5–13-0.0311%23 May
cache13–70.019%23 May
cache12–12-0.0316%23 May
dust212–120.1020%23 May
dust213–90.0224%22 May
nuke11–130.0432%21 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →