dynamics3 — CS2 Stats

EE76561198034422561[U:1:74156833]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

547Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since

2,213Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating3.5 Learning

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,137 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	35.3%	44.2%	44.9%	9.6% short
Shot accuracy	16.7%	11.2%	11.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.37	1.04	1.04	above
Match win rate	48.9%	45.3%	45.3%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46

Positioning34

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–50–6Last 10044%Win rateWWLWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6

Aggression1.2

Utility5.0

Positioning3.4

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6

Positioning3.4

Utility5.0

Mechanics5.0

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact3.8

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time623ms−4ms

first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms

Headshot accuracy11.5%−1.6%

first ⅓ avg 13.1% → last ⅓ avg 11.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–9

13–2Biggest win — ancient

3Longest win streak

W2Current streak

7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 100% over 6mirageWeakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	23	11–12	48%	-0.01
anubis	D	18	5–13	28%	-0.02
ancient	C	16	6–10	38%	-0.02
dust2	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.00
mirage	D	11	3–8	27%	-0.02
cache	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.03
nuke	S	6	6–0	100%	0.00
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.02
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

69,633Lifetime kills

1.37K/D · Top 10% of Level 5 players

4,032Matches

48.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players

35.3%Headshot %

16.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players

5,717MVPs

1,501Hours (in match)

2,590Bombs planted

1,021Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

M4A4 / M4A1-S13,081

AK-4712,681

P907,595

AWP6,930

P2000 / USP-S3,823

MP73,508

Five-SeveN2,948

P2502,560

Glock-182,289

Galil AR1,958

Lifetime map wins

21,822dust2

2,324inferno

1,129nuke

649vertigo

559train

197cbble

64safehouse

63office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

30Matches

57%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

59.6ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	7	43%	1.10	14.0
Mirage	7	86%	1.25	13.0
Anubis	7	57%	0.84	11.3
Vertigo	3	33%	1.60	21.7
Ancient	3	33%	0.73	13.0
Overpass	1	0%	1.23	16.0
Nuke	1	100%	1.10	11.0
Train	1	100%	0.58	7.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.4%Headshot accuracy

32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.1%Spray accuracy

72.7%Counter-strafing

10.9°Preaim

621msReaction time

24.3%T opening success

21.2%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

7.2%Flash assists

14.43HE damage / grenade

3.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.4347% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4615 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 24.2851% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–11	0.00	9%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.03	17%	25 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.00	22%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.04	11%	22 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	14%	22 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	5%	19 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	13%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.01	18%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.05	20%	19 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	20%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.04	10%	22 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.09	12%	22 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.01	8%	18 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.07	15%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	7%	17 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.06	9%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	6%	17 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.02	4%	10 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	15%	10 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	7%	9 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.01	12%	9 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	14%	7 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.00	12%	7 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	17%	30 Jun →
anubis	10–13	-0.00	7%	30 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.04	11%	17 Jun →
ancient	15–15	-0.02	4%	17 Jun →
anubis	3–13	-0.09	7%	13 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.10	9%	13 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.02	8%	12 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.04	15%	12 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.04	9%	8 Jun →
anubis	6–13	-0.02	10%	8 Jun →
nuke	16–13	-0.04	16%	5 Jun →
overpass	5–13	-0.06	12%	5 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.04	16%	1 Jun →
anubis	13–2	0.04	13%	1 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	11%	23 May →
overpass	13–4	0.04	11%	23 May →
ancient	2–13	-0.07	13%	18 May →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	8%	18 May →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	20%	11 May →
anubis	3–13	-0.08	7%	11 May →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	20%	11 May →
inferno	14–16	-0.00	7%	5 May →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	14%	30 Apr →
ancient	13–7	0.04	16%	30 Apr →
cache	13–7	-0.02	13%	30 Apr →
nuke	16–14	0.02	11%	28 Apr →
ancient	15–15	-0.02	11%	26 Apr →
anubis	13–7	-0.05	21%	19 Apr →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	13%	16 Apr →
inferno	13–8	0.02	14%	13 Apr →
dust2	15–15	0.04	14%	13 Apr →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	14%	2 Apr →
inferno	4–13	0.02	12%	2 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	18%	2 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.08	17%	30 Mar →
ancient	16–12	-0.03	14%	30 Mar →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	8%	28 Mar →
inferno	13–9	0.05	9%	28 Mar →
anubis	2–13	-0.16	3%	28 Mar →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	10%	28 Mar →
overpass	13–11	-0.04	5%	24 Mar →
mirage	13–9	0.12	12%	19 Mar →
anubis	7–13	0.04	8%	19 Mar →
train	12–12	-0.02	8%	17 Mar →
mirage	13–5	-0.06	14%	17 Mar →
dust2	13–3	0.05	15%	17 Mar →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	10%	10 Mar →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	9%	7 Mar →
ancient	6–13	-0.10	8%	7 Mar →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	14%	5 Mar →
inferno	13–9	0.03	11%	5 Mar →
train	13–3	0.11	13%	5 Mar →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	15%	4 Mar →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	11%	28 Feb →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	8%	28 Feb →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	13%	27 Feb →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	7%	27 Feb →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	6%	21 Feb →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	24%	21 Feb →
inferno	13–9	0.02	9%	21 Feb →
mirage	0–13	-0.08	9%	21 Feb →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	14%	20 Feb →
inferno	2–13	-0.09	17%	20 Feb →
ancient	12–12	-0.04	12%	17 Feb →
vertigo	9–13	0.02	14%	17 Feb →
dust2	13–6	0.06	16%	16 Feb →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	9%	16 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	6%	13 Feb →
inferno	5–13	-0.00	13%	13 Feb →
dust2	13–5	0.01	21%	13 Feb →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	11%	12 Feb →
dust2	13–4	0.04	16%	12 Feb →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	16%	10 Feb →
inferno	13–4	0.02	17%	9 Feb →
anubis	13–2	0.10	26%	9 Feb →
anubis	7–13	0.02	18%	9 Feb →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	10%	6 Feb →