#1

#1 — CS2 Stats

DK76561198341134240[U:1:380868512]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,843Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,589Purple band · top ~14.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9486 of 18504 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,689 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG#1FACEITLevel 8 · 1,689 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,589 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning46
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48493Last 10048%Win rateLWLLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression7.5
Utility5.8
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.6
Utility5.8
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time538ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 534ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — cache 13–6
130Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 5overpassWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA169756%0.01
cacheB157847%0.01
infernoB157847%0.02
ancientC135838%-0.00
mirageB105550%-0.02
nukeB63350%0.02
overpassD62433%0.01
dust2A53260%0.01
vertigo42250%0.00
train42250%0.04
fachwerk21150%0.04
warden21150%0.01
shelter1010%0.01
boulder110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

355Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
72.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10349%1.1914.6
Inferno5358%1.1314.1
Ancient4646%1.1914.8
Anubis4556%1.1715.8
Dust23148%1.0512.2
Nuke2843%1.0215.5
Vertigo1861%1.1516.7
Train1155%0.9511.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
537msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
48.4%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
6.82HE damage / grenade
12.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2603% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis2–13-0.0427%2 Aug
vertigo13–90.0510%1 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0722%1 Aug
cache6–13-0.0034%1 Aug
anubis13–1-0.0018%1 Aug
ancient13–8-0.015%1 Aug
inferno11–130.0321%31 Jul
ancient2–130.0011%31 Jul
anubis13–10.0919%30 Jul
cache13–50.0817%30 Jul
vertigo10–130.039%30 Jul
cache6–130.0024%20 Jul
ancient5–13-0.039%20 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0126%19 Jul
mirage7–13-0.057%19 Jul
nuke13–00.0625%19 Jul
dust213–80.0533%19 Jul
dust213–20.0324%18 Jul
inferno13–100.1215%17 Jul
ancient2–13-0.053%17 Jul
anubis13–80.0612%17 Jul
shelter7–130.0113%15 Jul
fachwerk10–130.1020%15 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0213%15 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0220%14 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0219%14 Jul
boulder13–70.0811%13 Jul
train13–30.1011%13 Jul
cache2–13-0.0225%10 Jul
inferno7–130.0135%10 Jul
fachwerk13–3-0.0320%10 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0218%9 Jul
cache13–90.0019%9 Jul
cache5–13-0.0618%8 Jul
cache9–13-0.0012%7 Jul
cache13–90.0416%7 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0220%6 Jul
inferno16–140.0311%5 Jul
mirage12–4-0.053%4 Jul
anubis13–50.014%4 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0112%4 Jul
mirage15–150.0413%3 Jul
cache13–30.0927%2 Jul
cache13–60.1220%2 Jul
inferno13–110.0716%30 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0213%30 Jun
overpass8–130.0517%30 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0723%29 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0427%27 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0119%27 Jun
overpass6–10-0.0922%26 Jun
warden13–70.0524%26 Jun
dust211–13-0.0918%25 Jun
ancient10–13-0.027%25 Jun
nuke13–60.069%24 Jun
train11–130.0417%24 Jun
train8–130.0927%23 Jun
inferno3–7-0.0313%23 Jun
anubis13–60.0410%21 Jun
cache13–80.0120%21 Jun
dust210–130.0131%21 Jun
inferno16–130.0423%20 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0518%18 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0520%17 Jun
anubis13–30.067%17 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0411%16 Jun
inferno13–100.0911%16 Jun
cache12–120.0420%14 Jun
mirage13–70.0817%13 Jun
inferno13–80.0226%12 Jun
nuke8–13-0.058%12 Jun
cache4–13-0.0614%12 Jun
train13–6-0.0617%12 Jun
overpass13–70.0314%12 Jun
cache10–13-0.049%8 Jun
anubis6–130.0228%8 Jun
vertigo13–11-0.0413%6 Jun
nuke16–13-0.0019%5 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0417%5 Jun
vertigo10–13-0.029%4 Jun
dust213–60.0414%3 Jun
cache13–7-0.0315%3 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0311%2 Jun
ancient4–130.0013%1 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0218%1 Jun
anubis13–20.048%1 Jun
ancient10–130.0213%31 May
inferno11–130.0624%30 May
ancient13–60.046%30 May
anubis12–12-0.0219%28 May
anubis13–60.0510%27 May
anubis10–13-0.046%25 May
warden7–13-0.0213%25 May
inferno11–13-0.0210%24 May
ancient13–60.0913%24 May
nuke4–130.0612%24 May
overpass7–13-0.0019%23 May
ancient13–90.015%23 May
inferno8–13-0.0326%23 May
overpass13–40.0910%23 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →