dream

dream — CS2 Stats

76561198032498269[U:1:72232541]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

870Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,018Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning57
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57349Last 10057%Win rateWWLWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7
Aggression7.9
Utility5.3
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.7
Utility5.3
Mechanics9.3
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact6.9

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time543ms−0ms
first ⅓ avg 543ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — office 13–3
130Biggest win — vertigo
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
92In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 77% over 13infernoWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2013765%0.04
anubisS1310377%0.06
infernoC135838%0.03
nukeA138562%0.06
mirageA116555%0.03
ancientC83538%0.03
vertigoS75271%0.05
overpassC52340%0.06
cache41325%0.06
office43175%0.07
train21150%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

62,488Lifetime kills
1.51K/D · Top 5% of tracked players
2,666Matches
42.8%Match win rate
49.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
10.0%Shot accuracy
7,397MVPs
1,018Hours (in match)
1,326Bombs planted
675Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,402inferno
2,409dust2
1,444nuke
1,180vertigo
544train
414office
238italy
155cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

65Matches
54%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
86.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1650%1.0214.6
Inferno1573%1.0415.4
Ancient1040%1.0615.5
Anubis850%1.2618.1
Dust2850%1.3718.1
Vertigo333%1.3115.7
Nuke367%1.0315.7
Train250%0.9716.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
40.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.4%Spray accuracy
91.7%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
541msReaction time
39.6%T opening success
55.8%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
10.8%Flash assists
5.36HE damage / grenade
7.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4731 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.5938% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–110.0110%11 Jul
dust213–110.0712%11 Jul
cache2–13-0.0318%11 Jul
anubis16–140.1012%11 Jul
inferno1–5-0.048%11 Jul
cache7–130.0423%11 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0022%4 Jul
dust213–70.0813%4 Jul
nuke13–80.0613%4 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0412%4 Jul
dust213–90.0115%2 Jul
mirage13–70.0718%2 Jul
dust215–15-0.0316%2 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0316%2 Jul
dust213–40.0113%2 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0527%1 Jul
office12–120.0522%1 Jul
dust28–10.028%1 Jul
nuke13–110.0314%18 Jun
ancient6–13-0.088%17 Jun
dust28–20.0124%17 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0313%17 Jun
inferno15–15-0.007%17 Jun
mirage13–100.0212%16 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0218%16 Jun
mirage0–9-0.056%15 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0111%15 Jun
anubis13–40.0315%14 Jun
cache10–130.1915%14 Jun
vertigo13–00.1450%14 Jun
inferno13–100.0514%14 Jun
overpass12–120.1713%14 Jun
office13–100.0113%14 Jun
train12–120.1621%14 Jun
nuke13–90.0622%14 Jun
anubis13–10.0711%14 Jun
overpass13–60.0611%14 Jun
dust213–100.0416%14 Jun
mirage13–40.187%14 Jun
ancient10–130.0514%14 Jun
inferno13–160.0413%12 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0115%12 Jun
anubis13–80.1114%12 Jun
anubis13–60.0212%11 Jun
dust211–13-0.0224%11 Jun
dust213–110.0120%11 Jun
ancient5–130.0432%10 Jun
dust23–90.0919%10 Jun
nuke8–130.0713%9 Jun
inferno13–90.1211%9 Jun
dust27–130.0516%9 Jun
anubis8–130.0414%9 Jun
ancient12–120.0523%8 Jun
anubis13–110.0613%8 Jun
ancient13–110.0412%8 Jun
dust213–110.1818%8 Jun
nuke13–90.0915%8 Jun
mirage13–70.0417%8 Jun
nuke13–70.098%7 Jun
dust210–13-0.024%7 Jun
nuke13–20.0620%7 Jun
overpass9–13-0.049%7 Jun
inferno13–20.0515%7 Jun
inferno9–130.1117%7 Jun
anubis13–00.1020%7 Jun
ancient13–20.0726%7 Jun
overpass13–100.0510%7 Jun
dust213–100.0916%7 Jun
nuke1–13-0.0119%7 Jun
office13–3-0.0243%6 Jun
inferno13–80.0617%6 Jun
cache13–90.056%6 Jun
vertigo4–130.0219%6 Jun
vertigo13–00.000%6 Jun
nuke10–130.0815%6 Jun
ancient13–70.1010%6 Jun
dust213–50.0413%6 Jun
office13–30.2315%6 Jun
overpass9–130.0816%6 Jun
mirage12–120.0417%6 Jun
anubis13–80.1018%6 Jun
dust22–130.0417%5 Jun
mirage5–130.1020%5 Jun
anubis13–100.0810%5 Jun
vertigo13–80.0518%5 Jun
inferno12–120.0816%5 Jun
train13–5-0.038%5 Jun
mirage9–130.0317%4 Jun
nuke13–30.1016%4 Jun
vertigo13–40.1730%4 Jun
dust213–20.0410%4 Jun
inferno9–130.0316%4 Jun
nuke13–70.0514%3 Jun
vertigo11–13-0.0015%3 Jun
dust212–120.0818%3 Jun
mirage13–80.0124%3 Jun
anubis4–130.0411%2 Jun
nuke6–130.0517%2 Jun
dust213–11-0.0018%2 Jun
vertigo13–8-0.0131%2 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →