Breezy

Breezy — CS2 Stats

76561198030385244[U:1:70119516]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

455Tracked matches59%Win rate2022Tracked since
723Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate36.4%42.2%42.7%6.3% short
Shot accuracy13.7%11.9%10.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.220.981.00above
Match win rate44.0%43.6%44.1%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBreezyFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning60
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateWLLLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression6.6
Utility5.3
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 652ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning6.0
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time650ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — nuke 13–5
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A22121055%0.01
infernoB1991047%0.02
nukeA169756%0.04
ancientB158753%0.01
anubisD123925%-0.02
mirageA85363%0.02
overpassC73443%0.01
cache110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

32,458Lifetime kills
1.22K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
1,714Matches
44.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
36.4%Headshot %
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
4,108MVPs
723Hours (in match)
1,571Bombs planted
458Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,492dust2
1,434nuke
1,335inferno
618vertigo
241train
25office
22cbble
19italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
652msReaction time
44.1%T opening success
38.0%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
8.27HE damage / grenade
7.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.9876% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–70.0513%10 Jul
inferno11–130.1016%21 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0715%21 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0814%21 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0113%20 Jun
dust29–130.0229%20 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0016%20 Jun
mirage13–50.0021%18 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0512%14 Jun
inferno10–130.0116%14 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0211%14 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0412%14 Jun
nuke13–110.1014%14 Jun
dust213–4-0.0121%13 Jun
inferno16–130.0910%13 Jun
nuke15–150.0420%13 Jun
overpass13–60.0113%13 Jun
inferno13–70.0114%13 Jun
nuke13–60.0315%7 Jun
dust210–13-0.0113%6 Jun
inferno13–60.0017%6 Jun
ancient13–60.0815%6 Jun
nuke16–120.0520%6 Jun
dust25–13-0.0114%31 May
inferno10–130.0320%30 May
ancient9–13-0.0120%30 May
nuke13–9-0.0323%30 May
dust29–130.0325%29 May
overpass13–20.0910%29 May
anubis10–13-0.0419%29 May
dust213–110.0621%29 May
ancient11–130.0412%28 May
inferno7–13-0.0110%28 May
anubis8–130.0216%28 May
nuke13–50.1619%26 May
ancient5–13-0.0610%26 May
dust213–20.0810%21 May
ancient7–13-0.016%17 May
inferno13–20.0222%17 May
dust213–10.1123%17 May
mirage9–130.1018%17 May
ancient16–130.0312%16 May
dust213–80.0515%16 May
anubis13–11-0.0113%16 May
dust213–90.0323%15 May
inferno14–160.038%15 May
anubis13–11-0.026%15 May
mirage13–110.0714%15 May
dust27–13-0.098%15 May
dust29–13-0.055%15 May
nuke7–13-0.0712%15 May
dust28–13-0.0917%15 May
anubis4–13-0.0217%10 May
ancient13–30.1121%10 May
ancient13–7-0.0516%10 May
nuke8–13-0.088%9 May
ancient13–110.0213%6 May
anubis5–13-0.0419%4 May
mirage11–130.0416%4 May
inferno13–6-0.009%4 May
dust213–70.0423%3 May
nuke7–130.0514%1 May
dust213–80.0417%30 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0315%28 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0319%19 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0314%18 Apr
nuke5–130.0815%15 Apr
dust213–11-0.0212%15 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0613%12 Apr
anubis11–130.0711%12 Apr
mirage13–10-0.038%12 Apr
nuke13–100.0912%12 Apr
dust213–60.0815%9 Apr
dust211–13-0.0019%9 Apr
nuke13–110.1020%5 Apr
nuke9–130.0419%5 Apr
overpass4–130.0218%5 Apr
ancient13–80.1122%4 Apr
dust29–130.0614%4 Apr
inferno13–3-0.0015%4 Apr
nuke5–130.0119%4 Apr
inferno13–100.1019%3 Apr
overpass15–15-0.019%27 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0612%16 Sept
overpass5–13-0.080%30 Aug
mirage13–40.0417%21 Aug
ancient10–130.058%21 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0114%17 Aug
nuke13–90.0423%4 Aug
dust216–12-0.0514%26 Jul
overpass9–130.028%26 Jul
dust213–100.0217%26 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0010%19 Jul
inferno13–60.069%18 Jul
inferno4–130.0214%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0322%6 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0327%6 Jul
anubis13–30.019%6 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0014%4 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0313%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →